Was looking over Mangani's data with a satellite coverage as a background and noticed that the big guy seems to prefer the wooded areas. Not surprising, but nice to verify. Look at the cluster in New Mexico around Alamadorda, and the sightings in Colorado. Deserts and the plains are practically empty.



Big Version

Interesting map, are all those little dots bigfoot sightings or footprints?

Interesting, indeed.

Can that map be enlarged to include BC? Alaska?

Interesting work as usual Belemnoid. Perhaps this is an attempt to answer my question posed in the Topo USA map thread about the "void" in east Texas around Davy Crockett National Forest? See my latest response there.

Socaldave,

These are reports since 1990 including sightings, prints, vocalizations, etc. See the entire thread referenced above or the BigfootMap site.

Huntster,

The data are a little sparse for BC and Alaska, so I'm not sure the satellite picture would be very conclusive. Still I definitely agree it would be interesting to see images like these covering more territory if Belemnoid can provide them.

Yeah, I didn't differentiate between class A/B, etc on this map - I was just trying to show location of all reports.

I can get a map of the west coast up later, but like Mangani said - there isn't much in BC/Alaska. Also, I chose this part of the country because the pattern was more obvious here. As you get farther east/west the reports become more widespread as the habitat gets more vegitated.