hi everyone good morning so whats new with the bfro expeditions lately have they any new evidence in nm or states as well. please keep me posted. bill green

i think that the bfro should have their expeditions in connecticut caves that probley where they will find some possible sasquatch evidence i hope. bill green

Have you been to those caves Bill? I bet if you could talk about what you'd seen there you would have more success trying to get BFRO to go. If you haven't gone yet, you should plan a trip. Make sure to take some good people with you.

hi db yes i have been some caves in connecticut such as torres den & the caves in lake compounce mountains but i have seen small caves along side the farmington river that a sasquatch could stay for short time. even the connecticut river has a good amount caves there. no i never found any sasquatch evidence at any theses caves in the past. but maybe the bfro or some bigfoot organizations could look at these caves in the near future. thanks bill green ct sasquatch researcher...

hi bfro researchers so how are your resent expeditions comeing along. i remember reading on the bfro expedition page of a bfro researcher took filmfootage of a sasquatch family in nm i would like to see any possible filmfootages that the bfro has. yes i know you have your policys etc. but they will realy help me with my sasquatch research ok. my snailmail is in my mini profile. bill green ct sasquatch researcher please keep in touch ok....

hi everyone..... good afternoon whats new with the bfro expeditions etc.... thanks bill green ct sasquatch researcher. please keep in touch ok..

hi everyone good evening i was just at the bfro expedition website expedition page. i see they are going to va to look for sasquatch evidence plus some other states as well. i wish the bfro wonderful luck i hope they keep us posted... bill green

Hey Bill.

Since it's a new month, the GCBRO and BFRO should have their latest sightings posted anytime now.

We'll ALL have to check those out and see what's new!

-Mike

hi mike i agree with your post. bill

It always does my heart good to see your posts Bill. Hope you're doing well.

i hope the bfro keeps us posted of their resent expeditions to va & other states as well. bill green

hi everyone i wonder the bfro wv sasquatch expedition turned out and their other expeditions i hope they found alot evidence to photograph & videotape etc. bill green

Hi Bill,

We aren't allowed to talk about what happened until after the official report comes out. It won't take too long after everything finishes up.

hi db thanks please keep me & everyone here posted when the wv expedition report is done. we are very patient too.. bill green

No problem Bill. I'll post a note here when it is done.

ok db me & everyone here will be looking forward to seeing report of the wv bfro expedition. please keep us posted. i go at least once a week in local woods in bristol,ct to look for evidence please look at my entire thread my ct bigfoot sighting in sightings & encounters. i found 2 possible footprints this week. i hope the bfro comes to connecticut sometime the best areas for you researchers to check is colebrook,thomaston,litchfield, & burlington. connecticut has a low amount reports becouse lack of food & water for the creatures in my state. what im trying to say is there is more water than deer in connecticut the creatures need both to stay in a area. is there any bfro researchers from connecticut that i can get in touch with by email. thank you bill green are you going to be put any sightings in the resent additions section of your great website soon. thanks bill green

Hi Bill,

I was just checking some of the BF sites online and found that bigfootinfo.org has a new siting in Connecticut. It is still being investigated, so all it says is: "Record has not been validated or is being studied." It will be interesting when they post the info. I guess they are working on a siting in CT from January, also.

hi hoosier yeah i know 1 of those reports is my sighting. bill green p.s. i hope the bfro puts my ct sighting in their databases.

Which one is yours, Bill? The one from January by the railroad track or the other one?

hi hoosier the january 12th sighting by the railroad tracks. bill green

hi db i complely understand that the bfro has policys about not giving out certain info about expeditions about sasquatch. but i think policys sometimes can be turn over in certain cases. good morning bill green

Hey DB, what part of the forest were you guys in? I'm heading to the Monongaleha (sp) in May. Thanks.

I am afraid that is confidential information. I could tell you, but then I'd have to.. well, the BFRO is a "No Kill" organization, so I'd have to lock you in a small rusty cage with one of our pet Squatches.

D'Oh, did I just say that? Nevermind..

What's with BFRO and their "super secret" locations. I wonder what excuse they'll come up with this time. In the past its been, "...well, our location is on private property, and the owners dont want anyone tresspassing, so we can't tell you." Since theyre most likely on National Forest land in WV this month, they wont be able to use that line. Why don't they just tell the truth and admit that they wouldnt be able to charge as much money if people dont think they're the only ones that know the "super secret" locations. it would be nice if after the expedition is over , they can release locations, so other "researches" can continue monitoring the area. Maybe each week, a different person(s) from Bigfoot Forums can go to the area for a few days. When they return, they can update a continuing thread on the message board about what they encountered. I've heard it said many times that it going to take a committed person to monitor and area over several months to get positive documentation. Well, how about many people over several months, and spread the work around. People have jobs and most cannot commit time to spending months in the woods. This is just an idea. Sharing information is what is going to get this job done.

ohio_squatcher

The reason the locations are not given out is really quite simple if you think about it for a moment. It's to preserve the integrity of the location. And that's not an excuse, it's a valid reason.

Of course, it would be a very bad idea to give out the location of the site before or during the expedition, but how about after the expedition is completed. I suppose there might be some concern that those characters from GCBFO might decide to set up one of their "hunts" and try to "harvest" one of the animals. I have a feeling they have their own secret spots to use however.

ohio_squatcher

Wait, what do you mean by the integrity of the location? Do mean scaring off the bigfoot? There's a hell of alot of acres out there. A few extra hikers in the woods with a eye out for signs of sasquatch activity isnt going to affect the conditions of their habitat significantly enough to make the location any less valuable as a research location in the future.

Maybe im misunderstanding you though or there's an aspect of this im missing.

ohio_squatcher

Keeping out would be hoaxers.

Obviously, hoaxers can be a real problem before and during an official BFRO expedition if the location is made public. But how about after the expedition is completed? Are they still a problem? I wouldnt think so. Maybe BFRO continues to monitor the area. I don't know. It would take a whole lot of effort to get back into to those woods, however and pull off a hoax for shits and giggles. You could make all the fake Bigfoot prints you want, and nobody would probably ever find them.

ohio_squatcher

Good points made Ohio. It's about the money and nothing else. They charge about $250 a head. I could be wrong but thats what I understand. All you get for the $250 is some infrared head gear that you probably have to share. A few people here and there going back where at least 20 expeditioners were is not going to damage the natural beauty of an area. Especially in some of these forests where few people venture into now. As I said, I'm going to the same WVa forest in May minus the $250. As for hoaxers, I think it would be pretty hard to find your way around the woods at night with that suit on. This forest has no marked trails. It is hard to navigate and manuver. We'll be deep in the forest. Any hoaxer will most likely stay close to the road or perhaps play his game on the backcountry trails which are wider and marked. More importantly, many more people will be on the backcountry trails such as; families, large groups, etc. Why create a hoax in the wilderness where no one will probably see you. The only one who will see you is a real Sasquatch. Who cares about sounds, cries, and thrown sticks. I want hair, pictures or a dead body.

Understanding your reasoning but, I'm not refering to someone in a suit. I'm referring to someone who would possibly fake call responses, tracks, or might even possible muck around with some equipment or possibly the expedition folk themselves. You never know what people will do. I think it is best to keep things on a low profile. Also, consider this; after the expedition is done, what if they had some success with it and publicly announce where the area is and they found something.......can you imagine the people trapsing around the woods then? What about the idiots with guns who shoot first ask questions later? :pinch:

K25150,
You probably have just as good a chance of encountering a Sassie as those who went on the paid expedition if you make the effort to put yourself in the proper habitat. In a wilderness like that, sasquatch have plenty of freedom to range quite a bit. If youre not in the same spot as the BFRO was, it won't matter. Habitat matters, and there's plenty of it in the Monghahela National Forest.
As a comparison of possible Bigfoot ranging patterns, let me bring up some sighting that occurred here in Ohio. Last summer there were several sightings in one county. Most likly it was the same individual. The sightings were sometimes dozens of miles apart. Somehow the bigfoot found a way to move through a lightly populated human inhabited area that is crisscrossed by many roads. In comparison, the Monghahela national Forest has comparatively few roads and few human inhabitants. I really can't see sasquatch confining themselves to just a few square miles. They probably range quite a bit throughout the National Forest just because they can.

ohio_squatcher

I liked your last point. Thats very true. The last thing we want is every yahoo out there with their hunting rifles thinking they'll get some reward. I also think BFRO wants the press and the kudos for being the group who finally solved the mystery.

I can agree with that, after all they are the ones who get the most press.

Mike,
I agree with you that if they really did have significant success, I wouldnt expect them to release the location. However, a footprint, here, or recorded call there, a fleeting glimpse of a Bigfoot by one person, really isnt significant groundbreaking success in need of a call for a blackout on releasing info. Now If a family of Bigfoot, approached the expedition and one of the Bigfoot politely asked for some garlic, and someone got it all on film. Id say thats success!!!!!!!
Just joking.... a little attempt at humor there.

ohio_squatcher

You're right Ohio. They will be everywhere. That place is so secluded. We're going to camp out by a stream or river. We'll be there for 3 nights. Should be fun.

K,
Good luck to you. I'd like to get out there soon myself. Thats one several areas that I think looks real promising in the tri-state (WV,Penn, Ohio) area.

ohio_squatcher

Ohio, well this is my first trip. This is pretty much a recon venture. Got to find the best places to explore, hike, camp, park, etc. I'm sure I'll go back many times. Not just to find a sasquatch but to enjoy hiking and camping in such an untouched area. We can easily form a group and meet out there. Something for the future.

But enough to bring some yahoos out.




Naaa! Happens all the time.

hi mike good morning i always read the expedittion reports section of the bfro website. i see once in a great while they get possible sasquatch footage if they are in right states of high sasquatch actvivity such as ca,or,wa, & nm oklahoma. thank you bill green

hello again bill

I just wanted to say that its been real quiet lately in PA. I will be going on my first expedition with some friends and family in June to the Chestnut Ridge area. The PBS has a lot of sightings posted, so I am hoping to come away with something, but I probably won't. The group is really excited about the trip. I will keep you posted.

The BFRO is really secretive. I think that all information should be shared immediatly, not put into a formal report. Something important could be left out. Collect your evidence, take your pictures, but don't stop someone else from trying to research. They may find something that you missed, and they may not want to share with you in return.

I do find however the BFRO database great and visit mutlipile times daily. Good luck to you Bill on your expeditions. Keep us posted.

-Sean (SFork1015)

hi sean again for your sasquatch yes please keep me informed me & everyone here DEFINETLY on your sasquatch expedition to chestnut ridge in june. thanks for your reply and dont forget to bring cameras. also do you have photos of chestnut ridge if yes please post them here if you want too. bill green

Bill, I will post everything that we find or even pictures of the areas. I will also be keeping a Log of events so I will post them as they become available. -Sean

hi sfork sean good evening im looking forward of seeing your photos of your sasquatch expedition. i dont think the bfro is seacretive but very careful of they tell about their expeditions etc. i realy injoy reading the sightings etc in bfro website. i wonder how the wv bfro expedition turned out. thanks bill green please keep in touch ok.

I've been looking forward to the WV report from the BFRO. I do have mixed feelings about the BFRO. I think that they have great methods, and a great database, but I think they lack in the communication area. The attitude should be more to share and less to hide. Thanks Bill.

I hear what you are saying about the BFRO. It does take quite a while to get things posted. I too have been waiting for the Fla report. Just like I waited for the NCal of May 04, the WA 1 Aug 04, NM of Sep . . need I continue. I have attended several with them and I can kinda understand why it takes sooooo long. You start off waiting for the input from all the attendees who have to travel home, go back to work, play catch-up with the wife and kids, then you have to write, and staff, and add pictures, and proof, ad nausium. If I was King of the BFRO, I would mark it "draft" and post it for comment. I have to compliment them though, they have a process, they follow it fairly closely, and their standards are high. When the thing finally comes out, it is usually worth the wait and accurately reflects what I experienced with them. Please, have a little more patience.

hi mstro & sfork sean thanks for the replys. mstro have you ever photographed possible sasquatch creatures or their footprints on bfro sasquatch expeditions also do you have any of the bfro expeditions on vhs or dvd please let me know ok. thank you bill green yes i agree the bfro is a wonderful website & organization.

Bill, I'll tell you what, if I ever get a picture or video, I'll make sure you see a copy! Your enthusiasm for the subject is an inspiration. Thanks for being around to keep our spirits up.

Ditto!

hi fishbone thanks for the reply. please keep me & everyone here posted on past & future bfro expeditions. thanks bill green i see on the bfro website they have at least 6 majer expeditions planned in usa.