Yeah, i've been thinking about this since my last post, an hour ago or so. (BTW - this BF obsession is getting in the way of my life!)
I have one very exciting idea, and another one that makes me doubt this whole thing.
I'll start with the exciting idea:
I at first thought it was odd that a primate type thing (if that's what the remains are) would be mistaken for a seal-like thing. Especially since i assume the guy that found it was an experienced Alaskan outdoorsman, and probably would have some idea what a seal skeleton looked like.
But then i decided to find out for myself what a seal skeleton is like. I found a great high res photo of a seal skeleton:
link is here (it's a Greenland Seal admittedly, but i couldn't find a pacific seal skeleton pic, and i'm guessing the basic morphology is the same) That was when I got a
weird feeling. The skull is like a bear or dog, but we're only interested in the bottom half of the skeleton, since my assumption would be that the half-man, half -seal creature would be expected to have the torso and head of a man, with the 'lower half' of a seal.
Look at the rear flippers.
They resemble very large, wide human feet. The 'legs' as well, are short in proportion to the body, and rather robust looking. Also a Sasquatch trait. It's very possible that the guy saw the skeletal remains of young Sasquatch legs and feet, and 'identified' them as the lower skeleton of a seal. The upper skeleton looked more human, to his knowledge, and thus the half human/half seal conclusion.
Makes my skin a little tingly
On the other hand:
One thing bugs me about the veracity of this 'report'. You say that he'd shown this to the Fish and Game people. Now, if these remains in any way resembled human remains (and if they are Squatch remains, or even 'human head/torso, seal flippers' remains, they'll at least look somewhat human), then the police would have been all over this.
There is no way that Fish and Game agency employees are going to come look at what might be two decomposed child corpses, shrug their shoulders, and leave them in the custody of some backwoodsman.
If there was any chance at all that they were human, the police would be investigating. And it doesn't sound like that's the case.
So what ever this guy's found, if it even exists, might not look humanoid at all. Which kinda rules out Squatch babies.
Nevertheless, i hope i'm somehow proved wrong!
-robo
ps. there
are plenty of plausible explanaitions for two dead babies. They might have been twins, which explains two of the same size. The mother may have died, leaving the two to die of exposure together. Or they may have both died within a short time of each other from disease or some other disorder.