Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: inspired by credibility thread
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > General Discussion
Pages: 1, 2
Fletch28
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic. in any event, this isn't meant to start any pissing contests. my conundrum is this. whenever a person steps forward with info, they of course are expected to offer up proof if possible. now a ridiculuos claim like shape shifting, crossing dimensions or squatch having a taste for midnight marshmellows and pooping in barns is sure to be questioned. but what if the claim is, " i saw one whose eyes reflected turquoise blue and i have seen others that dropped to all 4's." i think a person who has claimed to have seen 1 or 2 may be safe somewhat. but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why? because this person essentialy is unheard of to a large extent. why would a person with this much experience want to come forward with well meaning intentions to verify or confirm an assumption of squatch possibly being homo with nothing more than their word when they are going to get ripped for being nothing more then persisitent and lucky enough to have sitings and observations that were never reported or confirmed?
Versatile
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic. in any event, this isn't meant to start any pissing contests. my conundrum is this. whenever a person steps forward with info, they of course are expected to offer up proof if possible. now a ridiculuos claim like shape shifting, crossing dimensions or squatch having a taste for midnight marshmellows and pooping in barns is sure to be questioned. but what if the claim is, " i saw one whose eyes reflected turquoise blue and i have seen others that dropped to all 4's." i think a person who has claimed to have seen 1 or 2 may be safe somewhat. but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why? because this person essentialy is unheard of to a large extent. why would a person with this much experience want to come forward with well meaning intentions to verify or confirm an assumption of squatch possibly being homo with nothing more than their word when they are going to get ripped for being nothing more then persisitent and lucky enough to have sitings and observations that were never reported or confirmed?

You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks. Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info. Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.
big C
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're  a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic.

I take offense to that sir, I am a redneck and I have never used a conundrum - we get to know our cuzins' down here before we leap into the hay! woot.gif
jimf
Its not necessarily the claims themselves Fletch.. Its the sheer amount, without validation.
Lets face it there are some who can't step out thier back door without tripping over a bigfoot or 'evidence' of ones passing. more to the point lack of evidence and its not anything like 8 claims over 30 years.. Its more like 8 claims every month or so, at the very least reports of ongoing activity over a short time span with little or nothing to back it up other than thier 'word'.

Ever string all of those encounters together and read them carefully ? If not you should try it.. seriously.. its quite amazing in some aspects. And gives a whole new cause to questioning the creditbility and veracity of the person , making the claims.
QUOTE
You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks.
Yeah.. we know its all you ever say.. over and over and over..Name a name ( or the several as you'vre alluded to) ? How do you know they're any more experienced than I am ? Or any more experienced than anyone else on this forum? You don't!! Its that simple. And if you have no skepticism or can't stand to have what you've sighted questioned it is indeed better to just STFU. Cause thats one of the things that makes your credibility drop to below nothing.
QUOTE
Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info.
Degrading ? See above. If you reported it you should damn well be prepared to answer the questions . If you think everyone is just going to take them at face value because of your 'word' or the say so of 'so and so' then quit move on to tiddly winks and call it a day.
QUOTE
Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.
Oh please dry.gif .. You've done nothing but critisize this forum and the more skeptically minded from the beggining here and especially elsewhere. This forum is what it is, BECAUSE of the people who don''t take any report at face value no matter the source, or at least it was. Weren't you done here and not coming back btw ?
Moonlite
QUOTE(jimf @ Jan 12 2005, 10:35 AM)
Lets face it there are some who can't step out thier back door without tripping over a bigfoot or 'evidence' of ones passing. more to the point lack of evidence and its not anything like 8 claims over 30 years.. Its more like 8 claims every month or so, at the very least reports of ongoing activity over a short time span with little or nothing to back it up other than thier 'word'.

And still no photographic evidence.
Bf believer
QUOTE(big C @ Jan 12 2005, 09:46 AM)
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're  a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic.

I take offense to that sir, I am a redneck and I have never used a conundrum - we get to know our cuzins' down here before we leap into the hay! woot.gif

Oh thats rich. :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Versatile
QUOTE(jimf @ Jan 12 2005, 10:35 AM)
Its not necessarily the claims themselves Fletch.. Its the sheer amount, without validation.
Lets face it there are some who can't step out thier back door without tripping over a bigfoot or 'evidence' of ones passing. more to the point lack of evidence and its not anything like 8 claims over 30 years.. Its more like 8 claims every month or so, at the very least reports of ongoing activity over a short time span with little or nothing to back it up other than thier 'word'.

Ever string all of those encounters together and read them carefully ? If not you should try it.. seriously.. its quite amazing in some aspects. And gives a whole new cause to questioning the creditbility and veracity of the person , making the claims.
QUOTE
You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks.
Yeah.. we know its all you ever say.. over and over and over..Name a name ( or the several as you'vre alluded to) ? How do you know they're any more experienced than I am ? Or any more experienced than anyone else on this forum? You don't!! Its that simple. And if you have no skepticism or can't stand to have what you've sighted questioned it is indeed better to just STFU. Cause thats one of the things that makes your credibility drop to below nothing.
QUOTE
Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info.
Degrading ? See above. If you reported it you should damn well be prepared to answer the questions . If you think everyone is just going to take them at face value because of your 'word' or the say so of 'so and so' then quit move on to tiddly winks and call it a day.
QUOTE
Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.
Oh please dry.gif .. You've done nothing but critisize this forum and the more skeptically minded from the beggining here and especially elsewhere. This forum is what it is, BECAUSE of the people who don''t take any report at face value no matter the source, or at least it was. Weren't you done here and not coming back btw ?

Please go read the posting guidelines. Seems you don't like the messenger(OR THE MESSAGE). NOT MY PROBLEM.

I have made 192 posts and not a one of them were meant to be degrading or derogatory. Some might think so when i have defended myself. Get real man! I make a suggestion or statement that i think will make this a better board and you get your shorts in a wad. How is it you think your statements have more value than mine. Sure you can ask for names. That doesn't mean i have to give them to you. I have my opinion and you have yours . I noticed that you have several thousand posts. Start to think back about people that have one away since you started here. That will clue you in on some of them. I have never reported that i ever sighted any animal ever . That confuses me. Rereading i think i should change the phrase "skeptical attacks " to wasteful? juvenile? noncontributory" I have no problem with a person being skeptical. We seem to start out with a few good pages on many subjects and the wind up with about 15 pages with only actual useful stuff on the first few. Sure somone making a greatt amount of sightings over a short period are skeptical to me but hey! you or i can't actually say they aren't true can we.. I don't remember sayng that i was done here. I am sure you can correct me on this. Won't kill me to be wrong.
big C
There's a lot of gray area to blend into between skeptical and cynical. wink.gif
belleoftheball
QUOTE
Please go read the posting guidelines.  Seems you don't like the messenger(OR THE MESSAGE). NOT MY PROBLEM
Look Message boy, take it to the ABF board. Tired of you giving us the "MESSAGE." mad.gif

QUOTE
I make a suggestion or statement that i think will make this a better board and you get your shorts in a wad.

And thats coming from a Man with the BIGGEST WEDGIE here! (In the famous word of a Fish we all Know.... Puh lease!!!!!!!!) :rolleyes:

QUOTE
How is  it you think your statements have more value than mine.

Ah, have you looked at some of your statements there Pal? blink.gif

QUOTE
to wasteful? juvenile? noncontributory"

Need I remind you about the ABF Board?new_thumbsdownsmileyanim.gif


Fletch,
I think maybe you ought to have that person write their encounter(s) on paper first, then ask the tough questions and see if passes inspection. wink.gif You 've been in the field longer than some of us around. You would know how to handle it. new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif You know Bullshit when you hear it.
socaldave
Like I said in another thread, be prepared to defend yourself on the bff if you are bold enough to claim you have had a sighting or an encounter. And if you do share your experience, pick your words carefully. I found out the hard way the forums is not a bf support group. You live and you learn. Am I mad, no just a little wiser. New people posting sightings or encounters or footprints, be forewarned! Don't mean to piss anybody off, just sharing my opinion and perspective like the rest of y'all.
Versatile
Golly Gee! Belle! Just because you are not welcome at the ABF board is no reason to take it out on me. The rules here say you are not supposed to be bringing it over here. I sure seem to get a lot of flack or criticizim for pointing what i consider things that are hurting all of us. What happens at the ABF board don't really have anything to do with you(sure i am a moderator there ; the other moderators seem to have a problem with you from something in the past. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU. except your popcorn smiley's that seem to make fun of me or my posts(i will be glad to try and thicken my skin if that would help). I try to make contributions just like you do. What value is there to this forum when someone makes fun of a post ; such as when i made a post or two to try and help a newbie. Sure a little humor is good but a steady diet (that feels like harrassment)goes a long way. You don't see me doing this to you or anyone else. I am confused as to why you think my posts should be moderated. I have posted anything about any encounters(that i would consider an encounter) I am at a loss as to why imo you have attacked me today. You have mentioned that FLETCH should moderate my posts.I have been told that FLETCH28 is your boyfriend. Does that mean i will be treated unfairly? I WOULD BE RATHER TALKING ABOUT WHAT A BF IS DOING OR DOES THAN THIS TRIVIAL STUFF.

SO I WILL!!!!!

I am going to Costa Rica fr my annual vacation very soone and as soon as i get back i plan to go see MOBeliever and check out his situation as soon as i get back
As a last note. SOCALDAVE has responded since i started my reply. He doesn't say much except to warn other posters as to what will happen when they post! popcorn2.gif new_weirdsmiley.gif new_weirdsmiley.gif
Paul1968UK
QUOTE(Versatile @ Jan 12 2005, 04:07 PM)
No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.

So it is just a general bitch at everyone then ?
belleoftheball
QUOTE(Versatile @ Jan 12 2005, 01:54 PM)

QUOTE
Golly Gee! Belle! Just  because you are not welcome at the ABF board is no reason to take it out on me.

Really? Not taking that out on you. Seeing how I was there a few min this morning. That doesn't bother me in abit.
What bothers me what you don't like about this board you do over at the ABF you may not do that on encounters. But what I read over there, there isn't any encounters.
QUOTE
What happens at the ABF board don't really have anything to do with you.

Then why is my name mentioned over there?

QUOTE
the other moderators seem to have a problem with you from something in the past.

Really? Now thats NEWS to me seeing I had no problem with Tiny or anyone else other Moderaters that Moderates that board. There is not one thread that YOU can prove other wise. Here or at the KB board!!!!!
QUOTE
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.
Those are your words
Sorry Mod! Had to do it
You're the only one over spouting off about me.
QUOTE
You don't see me doing this to you or anyone else.

Not here you haven't.
QUOTE
Fletch should Moderate my Post

I never said that!!! Reread my post. It was fletch I was talking about. Sorry Fletch.. Fletch was talking about himself there. I was not trying to give it away. (Seeing there is no use for PM's here.)
QUOTE
that FLETCH28 is your boyfriend.

That certainly none of your buisness Pal! I let Fletch handle that one
QUOTE
I WOULD BE RATHER TALKING ABOUT WHAT A BF IS DOING OR DOES THAN THIS TRIVIAL STUFF.
Really? icon_really_happy_guy.gif It isn't Trival to you?
QUOTE
Fletch is your Boyfriend
Then you just proved yourself a Damn liar! wink.gif
This is all I'm gonna say in this matter.


Belle
socaldave
Versatile,
My opinion(warning) is meant towards newbies who may have an encounter or sighting and are eager to start their first in the field or sightings thread. Unfortunately, they may not receive the input or encouragement they might have hoped for from some folks around here. Yeah there are definitely some people who seem to have some flaky stories but a lot of others seem fairly credible. I CHOOSE to support those that seem to have credibility. But I wouldn't verbally bully anybody just because their report doesn't match my standards, I just leave them alone. Hope that clarifies my point.
Desertyeti
QUOTE
but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why?


Uuummmm...Because there's absolutely no proof of the claims? biggrin.gif
belleoftheball
Even though I never meet Fletch in person. He is really on the up and up. He's know well in other circles in the BF arena. I know some things he can't prove just like the rest of us. What I admire about him is, he isn't out to prove a thing. Hope to hear what he may have on film though. wink.gif

Belle
BenThere_2
ohmy.gif
This is useless.
There will always be desenting views,
opinions and just naturally non-supportive thread posts.

If one particular thread reads BS
best not to surrender to it
by building the pile. new_weirdsmiley.gif

I don't see Non-support to "NEWBIES"
only
opinions. ideas or speculations of their evidence presented.

If you can't play nice
then sit on the bench. mad.gif

The total membership here (BFF as a whole) are some of the most
knowledgable, curtious and opinionated Footers on the Web.

Love it or Leave it.

Robert


new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif
indybfhntr
OK what the hell is abf board? im lost here
Blackdog
QUOTE(BenThere_2 @ Jan 12 2005, 05:34 PM)
The total membership here (BFF as a whole) are some of the most
knowledgable, curtious and opinionated Footers on the Web.

Love it or Leave it.

Yep it's like TV..If you don't like what's on you always turn the channel.


I need a proofreader...anyone....Buehler...anyone
BenThere_2
QUOTE
indybfhntr 
OK what the hell is abf board? im lost here


So whats New Yankee??

ABF is the American Bigfoot Forum
ABF?
StacyInMI
QUOTE(belleoftheball @ Jan 12 2005, 03:49 PM)
QUOTE(Versatile)
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE(Versatile)
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.
Those are your words



I was just about to suggest that you put this back into your signature Belle, since I think sig lines tend to get overlooked at LOT and that most people here don't truly know what kind of person Versatile is or what he's about unless they read Kiamichi.... Then I saw that you used it in your post, so.... thumbup.gif
nightwing
QUOTE(Versatile @ Jan 12 2005, 10:07 AM)
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're  a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic. in any event, this isn't meant to start any pissing contests. my conundrum is this. whenever a person steps forward with info, they of course are expected to offer up proof if possible. now a ridiculuos claim like shape shifting, crossing dimensions or squatch having a taste for midnight marshmellows and pooping in barns is sure to be questioned. but what if the claim is, " i saw one whose eyes reflected turquoise blue and i have seen others that dropped to all 4's."  i think a person who has claimed to have seen 1 or 2 may be safe somewhat. but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why? because this person essentialy is unheard of to a large extent. why would a person with this much experience want to come forward with well meaning intentions to verify or confirm an assumption of squatch possibly being homo with nothing more than their word when they are going to get ripped for being nothing more then  persisitent and lucky enough to have sitings and observations that were never reported or confirmed?

You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks. Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info. Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.

There are members of this forum who have had multiple sightings..yet, have not been hung out to dry.
If folks are willing to make amazing claims..of hunts successfull, of shooting them off of their porch, of having them accost them every time they set foot in the woods..
Yet, they have no decent answers to even basic questions..and, the least ammount of uncertainty of their claim, is ment with derission on THEIR part("armchair researcher")....
Then, the blame for any negativity rests soley with them.
belleoftheball
QUOTE(StacyInMI @ Jan 12 2005, 06:56 PM)
QUOTE(belleoftheball @ Jan 12 2005, 03:49 PM)
QUOTE(Versatile)
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE(Versatile)
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.
Those are your words



I was just about to suggest that you put this back into your signature Belle, since I think sig lines tend to get overlooked at LOT and that most people here don't truly know what kind of person Versatile is or what he's about unless they read Kiamichi.... Then I saw that you used it in your post, so.... thumbup.gif

Thank You Stacy! wink.gif
indybfhntr
Well thank you redneck aka benthere2 ya know us yankees need help once in a while
jimf
QUOTE
Please go read the posting guidelines.
I know the posting guidelines better than you ever will.
QUOTE
Seems you don't like the messenger(OR THE MESSAGE). NOT MY PROBLEM.
There was a message in that mess ?
QUOTE
I make a suggestion or statement that i think will make this a better board and you get your shorts in a wad.
Why's this board need to be better? As has already been pointed out to you,maybe you need to work on bettering the other boards that you frequent. And just for your info.. boxer briefs don't wad. wink.gif
QUOTE
How is it you think your statements have more value than mine.
Umm.. howsabout cause I don't repeatedly keep refering to "experienced" field researchers whose name I won't give ?

As for your past posts here. Recall these ?
QUOTE
You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks. Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info. Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.
QUOTE
Take a blanket etc to a place that has chimps. You can be honest with them when they ask why you want it. I did it and it worked for me. Brought the Bf in real quick. A donation will make them glad to see you again and they will probably want to here your story.
QUOTE
Many child like attitudes have been exposed at the kiddie board.  Notice how almost every thread gets turned into a bunch of he knocks someone she knocks someone and everybody knocks back. MORE BULLSHIT THAN ACTUAL INFORMATION. iF IT WEREN'T FOR THE BELIEVERS THE NON-BELIEVERS WOULDN'T HAVE MUCH OF A LIFE! 

Test: Only mature adult's can sit back and not reply just to be argumenative!!
QUOTE
I wrote a real good reply and when i went to post my computer crashed.

I should correct myself : I should have said EXPERIENCED rather than serious. I did not mean to insult anyone at all. I sure don't know everyone and don't claim too. There are most likely some very EXPERIENCED people that do post here. I do know for a fact that some of the more experienced people that i know state to me that they do not post here because it is a kiddie board and they do want to put up with the crap they here there. They believe and they do not care what you believe. They state something they know and get a bunch of insults and accuizations etc they go away. My self i try to get along with everyone and among people i know i am known for that. I MYSELF HAVE TROUBLE at this board.

No i cannot reveal their names. I will not betray a trust.

Another correction: I didn't put MB in touch with anyone. They contacted him and i just verified that they were goodpeople and would treat him right. They must consider him legit.

Don't shoot the messenger!!! Just like in Elemetary school. All pay the price for the actions of a few.
And those are just a few examples from this board.. So I have to ask..if its so bad here for you why stay ? Go back to the other boards and bitch about this one to your hearts content and watch them laud the applause upon you.

Do you even recall what you wrote a week ago ? Because it certainly doesn't seem like it considering some your more recent posts here and elsewhere.
indybfhntr
Damn i got to learn the quote thingy icon_bang.gif
BenThere_2
QUOTE
indybfhntr  Posted on Jan 12 2005, 10:25 PM
  Damn i got to learn the quote thingy icon_bang.gif


There is much to Learn Grasshopper......
Shave your head and follow the
Brotherhood of the FOOT.
indybfhntr
my head is shaved already lol
Versatile
popcorn2.gif popcorn2.gif popcorn2.gif new_whistle.gif
Guy
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic. in any event, this isn't meant to start any pissing contests. my conundrum is this. whenever a person steps forward with info, they of course are expected to offer up proof if possible. now a ridiculuos claim like shape shifting, crossing dimensions or squatch having a taste for midnight marshmellows and pooping in barns is sure to be questioned. but what if the claim is, " i saw one whose eyes reflected turquoise blue and i have seen others that dropped to all 4's." i think a person who has claimed to have seen 1 or 2 may be safe somewhat. but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why? because this person essentialy is unheard of to a large extent. why would a person with this much experience want to come forward with well meaning intentions to verify or confirm an assumption of squatch possibly being homo with nothing more than their word when they are going to get ripped for being nothing more then persisitent and lucky enough to have sitings and observations that were never reported or confirmed?

Well, for one thing I think it's a bit unrealistic for a person to say he saw a bigfoot and expect everyone accept it as genuine. If I had a good, clear sighting, it would probably convince me, but I would not expect it to convince anyone else.

Another factor is presentation. An acount that reads like a solid, sober report instead of a sensationalistic tabloid article is going to be taken more seriously. So will an account in which someone saw a bigfoot walk across a clearing as opposed to someone who was taken captive by bigfoot and impregnated.
belleoftheball
QUOTE(jimf @ Jan 12 2005, 09:16 PM)
QUOTE
Please go read the posting guidelines.
I know the posting guidelines better than you ever will.
QUOTE
Seems you don't like the messenger(OR THE MESSAGE). NOT MY PROBLEM.
There was a message in that mess ?
QUOTE
I make a suggestion or statement that i think will make this a better board and you get your shorts in a wad.
Why's this board need to be better? As has already been pointed out to you,maybe you need to work on bettering the other boards that you frequent. And just for your info.. boxer briefs don't wad. wink.gif
QUOTE
How is it you think your statements have more value than mine.
Umm.. howsabout cause I don't repeatedly keep refering to "experienced" field researchers whose name I won't give ?

As for your past posts here. Recall these ?
QUOTE
You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks. Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info. Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.
QUOTE
Take a blanket etc to a place that has chimps. You can be honest with them when they ask why you want it. I did it and it worked for me. Brought the Bf in real quick. A donation will make them glad to see you again and they will probably want to here your story.
QUOTE
Many child like attitudes have been exposed at the kiddie board.  Notice how almost every thread gets turned into a bunch of he knocks someone she knocks someone and everybody knocks back. MORE BULLSHIT THAN ACTUAL INFORMATION. iF IT WEREN'T FOR THE BELIEVERS THE NON-BELIEVERS WOULDN'T HAVE MUCH OF A LIFE! 

Test: Only mature adult's can sit back and not reply just to be argumenative!!
QUOTE
I wrote a real good reply and when i went to post my computer crashed.

I should correct myself : I should have said EXPERIENCED rather than serious. I did not mean to insult anyone at all. I sure don't know everyone and don't claim too. There are most likely some very EXPERIENCED people that do post here. I do know for a fact that some of the more experienced people that i know state to me that they do not post here because it is a kiddie board and they do want to put up with the crap they here there. They believe and they do not care what you believe. They state something they know and get a bunch of insults and accuizations etc they go away. My self i try to get along with everyone and among people i know i am known for that. I MYSELF HAVE TROUBLE at this board.

No i cannot reveal their names. I will not betray a trust.

Another correction: I didn't put MB in touch with anyone. They contacted him and i just verified that they were goodpeople and would treat him right. They must consider him legit.

Don't shoot the messenger!!! Just like in Elemetary school. All pay the price for the actions of a few.
And those are just a few examples from this board.. So I have to ask..if its so bad here for you why stay ? Go back to the other boards and bitch about this one to your hearts content and watch them laud the applause upon you.

Do you even recall what you wrote a week ago ? Because it certainly doesn't seem like it considering some your more recent posts here and elsewhere.

QUOTE
popcorn2.gif  popcorn2.gif  popcorn2.gif  new_whistle.gif

I'm sure if you were wearing a dress Jimf, he might have something to say!

Belle
Versatile
Gee Belle! I keep trying to let by gones be bye gones and you seem to keep your shorts in a wad! The rules say don't bring stuff from other boards here. I AM TRYING TO ADHERE TO THOSE RULES BUT YOU SURE DON'T SEEM TO WANT TO!

What gives you the right to tell me where to go and what to do?

What is wrong with making a suggestion that i think will make this a better board?

What is wrong with making a suggestion that i think will help a newbie?

I am sure that my statement about "kiddie board" riled a few. Where there's smoke there is fire. I get no pleasure from gettin people riled up. I just repeated what i was told and after hearing it from a few i have given it some thought and thought i should pass it along. The way you seem to be so upset it makes me think that you think you are part of the problem. I sure hope you get over it. How about you pulling a report from some where and then post it here. You really do do that really well. I HOPE IT WILL MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER. popcorn2.gif popcorn2.gif popcorn2.gif
Versatile
QUOTE(nightwing @ Jan 12 2005, 07:17 PM)
QUOTE(Versatile @ Jan 12 2005, 10:07 AM)
QUOTE(Fletch28 @ Jan 12 2005, 08:40 AM)
conundrum: a seemingly unsolvable problem, unless you're  a redneck and have confused the word for a prophylactic. in any event, this isn't meant to start any pissing contests. my conundrum is this. whenever a person steps forward with info, they of course are expected to offer up proof if possible. now a ridiculuos claim like shape shifting, crossing dimensions or squatch having a taste for midnight marshmellows and pooping in barns is sure to be questioned. but what if the claim is, " i saw one whose eyes reflected turquoise blue and i have seen others that dropped to all 4's."  i think a person who has claimed to have seen 1 or 2 may be safe somewhat. but what if this person claims they have been looking since 1969 and has seen as many as 8. would this person then be scrutinized to the max and then hung out to dry? i think so. especially here. why? because this person essentialy is unheard of to a large extent. why would a person with this much experience want to come forward with well meaning intentions to verify or confirm an assumption of squatch possibly being homo with nothing more than their word when they are going to get ripped for being nothing more then  persisitent and lucky enough to have sitings and observations that were never reported or confirmed?

You sir have hit the nail on the head. I have previously stated that some very experienced people refuse to post here because of the skeptical attacks. Too much of a good thing will cause damage. The more and aggressive and degrading attacks have the effect of stifiling the presentation of new or contributory info. Thus the destruction of a good forum. No this is not a bitch or a criticisim of anyone in particular.

There are members of this forum who have had multiple sightings..yet, have not been hung out to dry.
If folks are willing to make amazing claims..of hunts successfull, of shooting them off of their porch, of having them accost them every time they set foot in the woods..
Yet, they have no decent answers to even basic questions..and, the least ammount of uncertainty of their claim, is ment with derission on THEIR part("armchair researcher")....
Then, the blame for any negativity rests soley with them.

I agree with you. When you make amazing claims you better be able to back it up.
Versatile
QUOTE(StacyInMI @ Jan 12 2005, 06:56 PM)
QUOTE(belleoftheball @ Jan 12 2005, 03:49 PM)
QUOTE(Versatile)
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE(Versatile)
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.
Those are your words



I was just about to suggest that you put this back into your signature Belle, since I think sig lines tend to get overlooked at LOT and that most people here don't truly know what kind of person Versatile is or what he's about unless they read Kiamichi.... Then I saw that you used it in your post, so.... thumbup.gif

Gee Stacy i am totally shook that when you brought my post over from THE AMERICAN BIGFOOT FORUM that you deleted part of it. You deleted the three DIGIT OF DISPLEASURE smileys i included with it. By doing so you have really diminished part of my thought's. :doh: That ok though. :willies:
Fishbone35
QUOTE
You deleted the three DIGIT OF DISPLEASURE smileys i included with it. By doing so you have really diminished part of my thought's.


Stacy realizes that those type of sophomoric emoticons aren't appropriate on this forum. And to think you referred to this forum as a kiddie forum. Give me a break! icon_really_happy_guy.gif

And as for your insistence that Belle is prohibited from copying and pasting your words about her on another forum into this one, you are quite mistaken. You may be trying to read into the policy what you want to see but you're wrong. In the context that Belle used your words against you, it was completely within the boundaries of the posting guidelines, whether you like that or not.

And while you're saving the world and trying to make this place a better forum, maybe you'd be interested in cleaning up your own backyard first. Of course, with the amount of traffic you're dealing with over there, it probably won't take you too long. wink.gif
Bitter Monk
Been off the board for nearly a week. Nice to see nothings changed. Carry on then. wink.gif
Fishbone35
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jan 13 2005, 04:42 PM)
Been off the board for nearly a week. Nice to see nothings changed. Carry on then. wink.gif

It'd kill you if it did. C'mon, admit it. wink.gif
Bitter Monk
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jan 13 2005, 03:44 PM)
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jan 13 2005, 04:42 PM)
Been off the board for nearly a week.  Nice to see nothings changed.  Carry on then.  wink.gif

It'd kill you if it did. C'mon, admit it. wink.gif

You mean by the suprise or the huge let down? laugh.gif
Desertyeti
Most Bitter Monk!
Glad you're back bruthu! new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif
Bitter Monk
QUOTE(Desertyeti @ Jan 13 2005, 03:45 PM)
Most Bitter Monk!
Glad you're back bruthu! new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif

Barely. Feel like I should be on life support right about now. Stupid cold. new_grrr.gif
Desertyeti
Drown that bastard cold with J&B!
At least the hangover will take your mind off of feeling sick. thumbup.gif
Bitter Monk
QUOTE(Desertyeti @ Jan 13 2005, 03:47 PM)
Drown that bastard cold with J&B!
At least the hangover will take your mind off of feeling sick. thumbup.gif

The saffire and tonic didn't kill it. I"m telling you its a monster.
Desertyeti
Woah... blink.gif
maybe call an exorcist...




woops...sorry, I didn't mean to hijack the "you're a poopy-head, No, YOU'RE a POOPY-HEAD" thread...back to it... wink.gif
Bitter Monk
QUOTE
Woah... blink.gif
maybe call an exorcist...


"I need a young priest and an old priest".
Fishbone35
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jan 13 2005, 04:45 PM)
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jan 13 2005, 03:44 PM)
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jan 13 2005, 04:42 PM)
Been off the board for nearly a week.  Nice to see nothings changed.  Carry on then.  wink.gif

It'd kill you if it did. C'mon, admit it. wink.gif

You mean by the suprise or the huge let down? laugh.gif

I was thinking it would be a combination of both. wink.gif
Versatile
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jan 13 2005, 03:41 PM)
QUOTE
You deleted the three DIGIT OF DISPLEASURE smileys i included with it. By doing so you have really diminished part of my thought's.


Stacy realizes that those type of sophomoric emoticons aren't appropriate on this forum. And to think you referred to this forum as a kiddie forum. Give me a break! icon_really_happy_guy.gif

And as for your insistence that Belle is prohibited from copying and pasting your words about her on another forum into this one, you are quite mistaken. You may be trying to read into the policy what you want to see but you're wrong. In the context that Belle used your words against you, it was completely within the boundaries of the posting guidelines, whether you like that or not.

And while you're saving the world and trying to make this place a better forum, maybe you'd be interested in cleaning up your own backyard first. Of course, with the amount of traffic you're dealing with over there, it probably won't take you too long. wink.gif

Read the posting gudelines for this forum! I said it at another forum and the rules say don't bring arguments etc from another forum to this one .I AM NOT ASHAMED OF WHAT I SAID. BECAUSE I MEANT IT. i HAVE NO DESIRE TO ARGUE WITH YOU HERE AT ALL. Come on over to THE AMERICAN BIGFOOT FORUM someone will most likely argue with you there. You have a goooood day!
Fishbone35
I did read them. Maybe you should read them again...carefully this time. Feel free to quote the section you're referring to though.

[edit] And as for going over there, thanks, but no thanks. I like this kiddie forum much better.
Huntster
QUOTE(belleoftheball @ Jan 12 2005, 02:49 PM)
QUOTE
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.

Hmmmm......

Looks like somebody got caught with their pants down.
Desertyeti
...while punchin' the clown... :blacknblue:
Fishbone35
QUOTE(Huntster @ Jan 13 2005, 05:00 PM)
QUOTE(belleoftheball @ Jan 12 2005, 02:49 PM)
QUOTE
I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST YOU.

You don't say?
QUOTE
Hey i try to get along and usually do get along with people. I must say though that several fine specimans over there are quite good cases for Abortion. B** R*** F**** and a B*TCH named Belle who can't get b***ed. Most likely i am going to start posting over here more. A lot of posters at BFF also a lot of juvee d**kh**ds and a gossipy b*tch named Bell that just likes to cause trouble.

Hmmmm......

Looks like somebody got caught with their pants down.

Yup. Exactly. And now he doesn't appreciate the fact that on this forum, yes indeed, you can be snared by the words of your mouth. Or fingers as it were. wink.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.