Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: There's no point in discovering new animals
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media
tugboatwa
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/commo...5E30417,00.html
QUOTE
Nameless fears preying on scientist's mind

By Leigh Dayton, Science writer - August 23, 2004

FROM stick insects to humans, Andrew Polaszek wants all creatures great and small to be known and named. But the British zoologist has a problem.

The scientific body that sets the rules for naming and sorting animals, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, is going broke.

The prospect is so dire that Dr Polaszek, the ICZN's executive secretary, has chosen to go public.

"Without the ICZN to regulate the naming of animals, it would be absolutely chaotic out there," he said during a visit to Australia last week.

"People would flounder in a sea of scientific confusion."

Dr Polaszek was in Brisbane to attend the International Congress of Entomology, where he made the first public announcement of the ICZN's flagging fortunes.

According to pioneering biologist Edward O. Wilson, concern about the ICZN's fate is not a "fusty enterprise" of esoteric scientific interest.

"The future of biology is going to be the exploration, management and study of the earth's biota," he said from his office at Harvard University, in Boston. "We cannot go forward without a sound basis of the classification of life."

The ICZN acts like a zoological version of the ICAAN, the group that assigns domain names and numbers to internet users and settles disputes.

Professor Wilson is so worried about the ICZN that he has agreed to help with fundraising, and fully supports Dr Polaszek's plans to use web-based technology to manage the burgeoning data.

The work of naming and classifying the planet's animals began in 1758 with the publication of the 10th edition of Systema Naturae by Swedish scientist Carl Linnaeus.

Since then, close to 1.2million species have been named. There may be 100million more waiting to be discovered.

The ICZN secretariat is housed in the paleontology department of the Natural History Museum in London. There, Dr Polaszek and two other scientists have a small budget to co-ordinate ICZN activities. Another 25 elected international experts voluntarily adjudicate in cases of dispute and policy. At present, the commission operates on money left from past sales of the ICZN's code of nomenclature. The last executive chose to give the code away.

Without new funding, Dr Polaszek predicts the ICZN will be bankrupt by 2008, the 250th anniversary of Linnaeus's great work. And that, said Professor Wilson, would be a "stain on science"
ecwool
While not directly related, I have previously contacted the ALL Species Foundation, which is a non-profit organization dedicated to the complete inventory of all species of life on Earth within the next 25 years - a human generation. My inquiries as to their interest in inventorying the Sasquatch went unanswered.

To describe and classify all of the surviving species of the world deserves to be one of the great scientific goals of the new century.

In applied science, this completion of the Linnaean enterprise is needed for effective conservation practices, and for impact studies of environmental change.

In basic science, it is a key element in the maturing of ecology, including the grasp of ecosystem functioning and of evolutionary biology. It also offers an unsurpassable adventure: the exploration of a little-known planet.

Here is a link to an article from National Geographic about this organization:
Team Races to Catalog Every Species on Earth
and some quotes:

Sometimes the world seems like a small place, but just how well do we really know it? When it comes to the other living creatures with which we share the planet, we don't know nearly as much as might be expected.

"Imagine doing chemistry knowing only one third of the periodic table," said biologist Terry Gosliner. "Sure, it can be done, but with an immense handicap. We are trying to do biology knowing perhaps only a tenth, or one hundredth, of our species. It is an immense handicap that does not need to exist."

To date, taxonomists have identified less than two million distinct species, mostly mammals and birds. But it's estimated that the number of undiscovered species—primarily fish, fungi, insects, and microbes—ranges from ten million to more than one hundred million. Even at the low estimate, it's an enormous number.

New species are being classified at a rate of only 15,000 a year. That's not nearly fast enough to significantly close the knowledge gap.
Huntster
QUOTE(tugboatwa @ Aug 22 2004, 01:25 PM)
The scientific body that sets the rules for naming and sorting animals, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, is going broke....

"Without the ICZN to regulate the naming of animals, it would be absolutely chaotic out there," he said during a visit to Australia last week....

"People would flounder in a sea of scientific confusion."

Now here I am, floundering in a turbulent sea of great concern for our critical animal naming enterprise.

Imagine where we will be when these people's biological/zoological peers FINALLY "authorize" the existence of sasquatch/bigfoot/ohmah/kushtaka/whatever, and we won't have an official "naming" body.

Maybe that's why sasquatch still isn't recognized; the "recognizing" organization went broke a long time ago.

ecwool, Posted on Aug 22 2004, 01:45 PM
QUOTE
...I have previously contacted the ALL Species Foundation, which is a non-profit organization dedicated to the complete inventory of all species of life on Earth within the next 25 years - a human generation. My inquiries as to their interest in inventorying the Sasquatch went unanswered.


Imagine that.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.