tugboatwa
May 18 2004, 01:55 PM
http://www.jg-tc.com/articles/2004/05/17/news/news03.txtQUOTE
Film crew documents Tuscola chief's big bird story
By NATHANIEL WEST, Staff Writer
FINDLAY -- The large "Thunderbirds" return every 27 years to steal away the children of the Cherokee people, according to legend.
On Sunday, Chief John "A.J." Huffer returned to the lake where he claimed to have filmed two such Thunderbirds almost 27 years ago.
Were they really the monstrous predators of Cherokee lore, or were they just turkey buzzards basking in the warmth of summer?
Huffer believes in the former. But a film crew from Canada is trying to separate fact from fiction, and, perhaps, entertain young viewers of the non-fiction show "Mystery Hunters" in the process.
After all, entertainment follows closely behind Huffer, a Tuscola resident and chief of the Illinois Cherokee Band.
"It takes a Cherokee to film a Cherokee legend," said Huffer, 69.
In a deep yet gravely voice, he narrates the story like someone who has told it a thousand times. He probably has.
"I think I have photographed a living legend," he said.
Thus, he boarded a canoe Sunday with 16-year-old Araya Mengesha, one of two "reporters" on the documentary show aired by networks of Discovery Communications Inc.
With a cameraman, sound man, director and production assistant in tow, Huffer and Mengesha paddled across Lake Shelbyville while the chief recalled his tale.
A host of Internet Web sites describe how, in the summer of 1977 in Lawndale, a large bird swooped down and momentarily grabbed a young boy by the name of Marlon Lowe.
And rumors soon took wing that the Thunderbirds of old were back again. Of course, a sizeable reward was offered for pictures of them.
Huffer, who had learned to use a 16 mm camera with the U.S. Marine Corps, set out with his son, Jason, on the morning of July 26, 1977.
As they entered a cove near the Findlay marina on Lake Shelbyville, they spied two large birds in a tree. Huffer turned on his camera, the noise of which scared the birds into flight.
He shot about 100 feet of color film. Copies have since been purchased by television producers all over the world.
Huffer estimated the jet-black birds had wingspans of 18 feet and 14 feet, respectively.
Almost 30 years later, the story caught the attention of Montreal-based Apartment 11 Productions, which produces the children's show "Mystery Hunters."
"We're doing legends and myths," said Serge Marcio, director of the Thunderbird segment. "We're into ghost stories."
Mengesha and the rest of the Canadian crew also spent time Sunday in Normal with an Illinois State University professor and bird expert, Angelo Capparella.
After viewing Huffer's film, the professor told the young reporter that the birds probably were just turkey vultures, according to Cassie Fifer of Sullivan, the crew's production assistant, who was recruited for the Illinois shoot.
Marcio said "Mystery Hunters" will leave it up to the viewers to decide.
"There are pros and there are cons," he said. "That's what makes a mystery — there are no definite answers."
Warlock
Jun 19 2004, 09:51 AM
I've always been fascinated by the possibility of the Thunderbirds. I recall watching a special on cryptozoology and the theory is that they are so large that they have to wait for a frontal system to move through the area before they can launch so they ride the fast moving system as they migrate.
I would love to see one of these monster birds.
I remember the summer of 1974 here on the Texas Gulf Coast, there was a story going on all summer of a giant bird being spotted several times. The story got weirder and weirder and of course got so distorted that "witnesses" were claiming it had the face of a monkey, with glowing red eyes........yada yada.
I wonder if the original sighting (if there really WAS one) could have been a Thunderbird?
magikern
Jun 20 2004, 11:04 AM
QUOTE
A host of Internet Web sites describe how, in the summer of 1977 in Lawndale, a large bird swooped down and momentarily grabbed a young boy by the name of Marlon Lowe.
Both the boy and his mother confirmed that the bird was a Californian Condor after looking at some pictures.
It was an unusually big and agressive condor that attacked him indeed but hardly capable of lifting the boy of the ground.
moregon
Jun 20 2004, 03:30 PM
Hmmmm never heard of the sighting in Normal, Illinois, however. About the same time of that sighting, numerous reports were coming out of Belvediere, Illinois, ESE of Rockford, about a similar large bird. This also included several pets and a small child being picked up by the bird. The size seems to about the same as I remember.
My first impression when I heard the reports at the time, yes I was alive in the 70's and living in nearby Roscoe, was that it was a California Condor or relative. The verbal description of the bird conincided with the physical appearance of a Condor, however a 18 foot plus wingspan is not the norm.
nightwing
Jun 20 2004, 06:59 PM
I have always wondered about the chance that perhaps there are still some Teratorns around, in central or south America, and maybe they occasionaly get blow off target, or, maybe the Central part of N.A. is/was, a migratory location.
IF(and it's as big an "if" as one can imagine), Teratorns do survive in some tiny remant population, and they may migrate...perhaps a handfull occasionaly find their way back "home"...
Sightings in Texas and Oklahoma of large flying creatures are also reported..and if these were migrationg teratorns out of central/south america, they would fly right over Texas/Oklahoma, on their way to the midwest....
All of the above could also apply to some population of Andes Condor, maybe one that used to migrate into N.A(yeah..I am really stretching now), and again, for some reason used the Midwest as a feeding/breeding area? Again, it would fly over Texas/OK. on it's way north and east.
Just tossing out wild theorys..but odd as it may seem, this seems to me one of the more likely crypto candidates to one day turn up as real.
Here is a crop of an account of the discovery of the largest species of pre-historic teratorn.
Note, these live up until relatively recent times....so it is not entirely out of the question that in the windswept mountains of South America, they may not still survive?
Warlock
Jun 20 2004, 08:47 PM
Good lord! That bird dwarfs a Bald Eagle!!! That's freakin' amazing.......
Huntster
Jun 21 2004, 10:28 AM
This story was widely reported here in Alaska a couple of years ago.
Manokotak is a native village which has also been the site of several sasquatch sightings which I thought very credible, including one in which a small charter flight with a dozen people on board saw the thing walking about. The pilot saw it first, then circled it while everybody else on board looked out the windows and saw it.
Manokotak is in the Illiamna/Bristol Bay region, which has a long, regular history of such reports. There are even reports of lake monsters in Lake Illiamna similar to Loch Ness, Lake Champlain, Ogopogo, etc. Lake Illiamna is the largest lake in Alaska.
The "giant bird" story:
(http://www.adn.com/front/story/1962481p-2066841c.html)
QUOTE
Southwest Alaskans see bird they say is Super Cub-sized
Skeptical biologists say people are probably reporting a Steller's sea eagle
By Peter Porco
Anchorage Daily News
(Published: October 15, 2002)
A giant winged creature, like something out of Jurassic Park, has reportedly been sighted several times in Southwest Alaska in recent weeks.
Villagers in Togiak and Manokotak say they have seen a huge bird that's much bigger than anything they have seen before.
A Dillingham pilot says he spotted the creature while flying passengers to Manokotak last week. He calculated that its wingspan matched the length of a wing on his Cessna 207. That's about 14 feet.
Other people have put the wingspan in a similar range.
Scientists aren't sure what to make of the reports. No one doubts that people in the region west of Dillingham have seen a very large raptorlike bird. But biologists and other people familiar with big Alaska birds say they're skeptical it's that big.
A recent sighting of the mystery bird occurred last Thursday morning when Moses Coupchiak, a 43-year-old heavy equipment operator from Togiak, 40 miles west of Manokotak, saw the bird flying toward him from about two miles away as he worked his tractor.
"At first I thought it was one of those old-time Otter planes," Coupchiak said. "Instead of continuing toward me, it banked to the left, and that's when I noticed it wasn't a plane."
The bird was "something huge," he said. "The wing looks a little wider than the Otter's, maybe as long as the Otter plane."
The bird flew behind a hill and disappeared. Coupchiak got on the radio and warned people in Togiak to tell their children to stay away.
Pilot John Bouker said he was highly skeptical of reports of "this great big eagle" that is two or three times the size of a bald eagle. "I didn't put any thought into it."
But early this week while flying into Manokotak, Bouker, owner of Bristol Bay Air Service, looked out his left window and 1,000 feet away, "there's this big . . . bird," he said.
"The people in the plane all saw him," Bouker said. "He's huge, he's huge, he's really, really big. You wouldn't want to have your children out."
To Nicolai Alakayak, a freight and passenger driver from Manokotak who was flying with Bouker, said the creature looked like an eagle and was as large as "a little Super Cub."
Comparison to an eagle, certainly. Super Cub? Probably not, scientists said.
"I'm certainly not aware of anything with a 14-foot wingspan that's been alive for the last 100,000 years," said federal raptor specialist Phil Schemf in Juneau.
Schemf, other biologists, a village police officer and teachers at the Manokotak School said the sightings could be of a Steller's sea eagle, a species native to northeast Asia and one of the world's largest eagles. It's about 50 percent bigger than a bald eagle.
The Steller's eagle has occasionally shown up in the Pribilof Islands, on the Aleutian chain and on Kodiak.
A bird known to be a Steller's sea eagle has been spotted three times since May and in August of last year, 40 miles up the Nushagak River from Dillingham, according to Rob MacDonald of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Another Steller's eagle took up residence on the Taku River south of Juneau for 10 summers starting in the late 1980s, Schemf said.
The fish-eating Steller's sea eagle can weigh 20 pounds and have a wingspan of up to 8 feet. It has a distinctive and impressive appearance, Schemf said, with a pronounced yellow beak, a black or dark brown body and large white shoulder patches.
"It's hard to mistake it for something else," he said. It's clearly an eagle, though more "like a giant bald eagle."
People who observe animals "don't always have the sizes right, but this is very different because the people in that area know what eagles look like," said Karen Laing, also a federal biologist.
"I don't know of any bird that's three times the size of an eagle," Laing said. "What would that be? An ostrich? What bird occurs here that would possibly be three times the size of an eagle or the size of a Super Cub?"
Reporter Peter Porco can be reached at pporco@adn.com and at 907 257-4582.
wolftrax
Jun 21 2004, 02:44 PM
Here's a Teratorn - human comparison.
btuck85
Jun 25 2004, 01:37 PM
Was that teratordon'tmakemefinishthespelling an actual finding or just a mock up of one?
Warlock
Jun 25 2004, 07:51 PM
That's just a mock up...........but still.........
one pin feather alone is bigger than the man standing there in the pic.
How would you like to see that monster flying after you?
VAFooter
Jul 12 2009, 04:17 PM
Found a site about the Lawndale incident elsewhere and just thought I would post it for reference, even though the mystery seems to have been solved.
http://www.cryptozoology.com/articles/marlon.phpI don't think I had heard of it until I went to the site...
Redwolf
Jul 12 2009, 05:18 PM
I met a women who's grandmother grew up in Texas. The grandmother was young girl in the early 1900's and swears that she saw a Thunderbird one day. If I recall correctly, she was with her brother and they both described the bird the same way. Both children came back to their home terrified of what they had seen. According to family that description matched an image of a Pterodactyl.
Take it for what it's worth, but I thought the story was interesting.
RW
Nightwish
Jul 13 2009, 07:00 PM
I had a guy from Michigan tell me he saw one up close.....big thing too....
Saskeptic
Jul 15 2009, 03:01 PM
"The birds description : It had a white ring around it's half foot long neck. The rest of the body was very black. The birds bill was six inches in length and hooked at the end. The claws on the feet were arranged with three front, one in the back. Each wing, less the body, was four feet at the very least. The entire length of the birds body, from beak to tail feather was approximately four and one half feet."
My bolding.
So why does this story get perpetuated in this "thunderbird" context? I mean, personally I think it's nothing but a tall tale by some people with some other issues, but even if accurate in detail, it still sounds like nothing more than a pair of eagles. Even in all the excitement and the enlargement of animals by witnesses, we're looking at a bit more than an 8' wingspan.
BABADADA
Jul 27 2009, 03:48 PM
Birds are a hobby of mine, I am always on the lookout. Here in Phoenix AZ this morning I saw 2 Harris Hawks at a distance of 10yds - they were totally fearless.
I think a bird of this size could evade detection, for example; Crows are smart as heck! and If a bird this big is out and about it probably has basketball sized eyes and can see us before we see them.
weird bird story:
When Hurricane Gloria hit Connecticut back in the 80's I swear I saw a Flamingo.
dagoth_jeff
Sep 25 2009, 06:56 PM
A guy I knew in the Army said he saw one in South Korea. It was standing to the side of a road. When it spread its wings to take off, he could estimate the wingspan as it spanned the road. This guy was extremely intelligent and reputable, didn't drink or do drugs. I believe him.
AMereHuman
Oct 1 2009, 04:23 AM
I seriously once thought I saw a pterodactyl and was darn near having a heart attack over it. Then it changed its flight path and I saw clearly it was a blue heron. Seriously if they hold their head back a certain way and fly a certain weird angle at sunrise they look just like drawings of pterodactyl.
Saskeptic
Oct 1 2009, 08:10 AM
QUOTE(AMereHuman @ Oct 1 2009, 05:23 AM)

Then it changed its flight path and I saw clearly it was a blue heron.
Thanks for being a voice of reason, AMereHuman. I was getting a little worried about this thread.
Folks, there are no living teratorns or other giant flying birds out there any larger than our magnificent condors, swans, albatrosses, pelicans, bustards, etc. There just aren't. No extant pterosaurs either.
ludo
Oct 1 2009, 12:24 PM
Absolutely, Saskeptic.
And what interests me is that if it's in the sky you can't have a shadowy, behind-the-trees blob-bird, but with nothing but clouds or Rayleigh Scattering blue as a backdrop your bird could appear as big as a plane. I've watched raptors hovering by the motorways in the UK, on the lookout for roadkill. They ride the wind so calmly it's like they're moving ponderously. The illusion, from the right angle, is that they're bigger, heavier and further away. If you ever see a 747 fly over you at say 2000 feet, it looks so much slower than a smaller airliner, simply because it's so much bigger. The speeds are the same, though.
ludo
Oct 1 2009, 12:31 PM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 1 2009, 08:10 AM)

Folks, there are no living teratorns or other giant flying birds out there ... There just aren't. No extant pterosaurs either.
Sorry, Sas, but re-reading this I can't help thinking it's akin to the hubris that could have come from a horror movie.
Saskeptic (later): Help! Call 911! Its talons are the size of carving knives! It's got me! Thank goodness I'm still clutching my laptop and getting a WiFi signal! My God! It's leathery! It's the size of a Winnebago, but significantly wider, without a kitchen and clearly from the late Triassic period. I'm now in its nest. It's got babies! There's a breeding populati ... [static noise as communications cease]
Saskeptic
Oct 1 2009, 01:57 PM
The hubris was intentional Ludo - I'm completely unapologetic on this one. I'll gladly risk being the idiot scientist who claimed there were no thunderbirds right before Rodan destroys Tokyo.
AMereHuman
Oct 1 2009, 02:26 PM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 1 2009, 07:10 AM)

Thanks for being a voice of reason, AMereHuman. I was getting a little worried about this thread.
Folks, there are no living teratorns or other giant flying birds out there any larger than our magnificent condors, swans, albatrosses, pelicans, bustards, etc. There just aren't. No extant pterosaurs either.
Hey hold on I didn't ever claim to be the voice of reason.

I'm just saying before you assume you just saw a monster keep looking and make sure the lighting and angles isn't playing tricks on you. I don't know that I believe in teratorns still living. However I'm not convinced that Thunderbirds don't still exist which I think are a different species of bird. I am Cherokee so I grew up hearing stories of the giant T-birds said to have once lived around the Smokies and places like Chattanooga there's suppose to be a bluff they nested on. Especially now that modern people are seeing giant birds and even reporting being grabbed by them and carried. Its just like ol Hairy Man just because you haven't found a skeleton in the woods doesn't mean its not true because who ever finds a skeleton of a bear and we know they exist. Kinda like where I'm living now people insist javelinas don't leave the desert and come up to this altitude. But I & 2 friends found a full javalina skeleton right here in the forest, yet people still don't believe me when I say they are up here. Just like they don't believe that bears live up here because they never seen one. Yet I knew they did because being a Smokies girl I knew black bear print when I saw it covering the mud at a nearby lake. No one believed me for years then finally there were photos in the paper a few months ago of a bear running around townhouses in the middle of downtown. So anything's possible.
Saskeptic
Oct 1 2009, 04:17 PM
QUOTE(AMereHuman @ Oct 1 2009, 03:26 PM)

So anything's possible.
Not exactly
anything, which is my point. Airplane-sized birds really can't hide anywhere. If I ask a bigfooter, "where are all the bigfoots
right now," he can respond that they're hiding out in some dense cover in some isolated area. But if I ask the same question about, for example, a teratorn, the same answer defies logic.
AMereHuman
Oct 1 2009, 05:44 PM
Do you recall hearing reports in early 1990's about several pilots claiming their small planes were chased by giagantic birds? I'm straining my brain seems like was in Alaska and Russia and there was a cluster of reports. Was anything ever determined about that like was it proved hoax?
Furious_George
Oct 1 2009, 09:28 PM
If they were flying around today....wouldn't they show up on radar?
AMereHuman
Oct 1 2009, 11:52 PM
I really don't know. I assumed only metal shows up on radar. Otherwise wouldn't every flock of birds flying South trigger radar?
Saskeptic
Oct 2 2009, 07:56 AM
QUOTE(AMereHuman @ Oct 2 2009, 12:52 AM)

I really don't know. I assumed only metal shows up on radar. Otherwise wouldn't every flock of birds flying South trigger radar?
Every flock of birds does trigger radar. Meterologists filter the bird signatures out before presenting the real precipitation signatures on the nightly news. Weather radar (unfiltered) is actually one of the most powerful tools we have to track birds on migration.
Incorrigible1
Oct 2 2009, 08:56 AM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 2 2009, 08:56 AM)

Every flock of birds does trigger radar. Meterologists filter the bird signatures out before presenting the real precipitation signatures on the nightly news. Weather radar (unfiltered) is actually one of the most powerful tools we have to track birds on migration.
And recent remarkable discoveries were made about bird's migrations during nighttime, dark hours via weather radar.
Saskeptic
Oct 2 2009, 09:42 AM
QUOTE(Incorrigible1 @ Oct 2 2009, 09:56 AM)

And recent remarkable discoveries were made about bird's migrations during nighttime, dark hours via weather radar.
Correct. The big ones (geese, pelicans, cranes, hawks) migrate by day, but those thousands of "little brown jobs" are almost exclusively nocturnal migrants.
dogu4
Oct 2 2009, 11:52 AM
Those reports regarding really big birds a couple of years ago were from Western Alaska, an area where there a quite a few bush pilots with a lot of experience in judging visual cues out across a relatively featureless region in the Yukon Kuskokwim delta and along the coat of the Seward Peninsula. And the pilot said that based how it flew and other cues that it had to be huge...much bigger than a plain old eagle, and tere are eagles and other big birds there already and so that was used as a reason to both reinforce the report and explain it. There are on occasion steller eagles which are endimic to Kamchatka and coastal eastern siberia, which are bigger found on the coast and in the aleutians, so maybe it was that. Human perception of size is a tricky thing and our ability to tell how far and therefore how big a thing is without any other known object for referrence is pretty poor once the objects a beyond 50 feet...at which point the focus is all the same whether they're near of far away. So there's a lot of opportunity for size illusions to happen.
If you ever get a chance to fly across western Alaska in a bush plane you will be impressed how the phenomenon called "the big sky effect" is so evident especially out there...no matter how many planes are in the skies that you know are there you can't see 'em usually until they're pretty close and or parallelling your course so you an key in on it.
I've wondered if a condor could have made it that far north but they're so conspicuous you figure they'd be seen again and again, and yet this bird was reported just a couple of times and then not another peep.
Furious_George
Oct 2 2009, 12:49 PM
QUOTE(Incorrigible1 @ Oct 2 2009, 10:56 AM)

And recent remarkable discoveries were made about bird's migrations during nighttime, dark hours via weather radar.
Yes and colonies of bats catching up with swarms of insects. Very cool to see.
A flying thunderbird would get jets scrambled often. There would be lots of reports.
Or... maybe they eat bats and have radar jamming capabilities. Ever think of that.... hmmm? hmm? No?.... <---- Only goofing, I hope nobody agrees.
AMereHuman
Oct 2 2009, 04:30 PM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 2 2009, 06:56 AM)

Every flock of birds does trigger radar. Meterologists filter the bird signatures out before presenting the real precipitation signatures on the nightly news. Weather radar (unfiltered) is actually one of the most powerful tools we have to track birds on migration.
I wasn't even thinking of weather radar.

Forgot they even had that. I was thinking only airport and military radar. So do weather balloons show up on weather radar too? How can they ever follow the weather with all the birds and everything else showing up?
Only thing is if you use the argument that there's no way T-birds could exist because radar would pick them up then how can people insist Squatchie exists when he never shows up on thermal imaging? Just a thought.
IcecreamLtDan
Oct 2 2009, 10:21 PM
Radar (Radio Detection And Ranging) is basically just radio waves that are reflected off of objects. The reflections are measured for return time and signal strength to give a "picture" of the object and its location. Any object is capable of reflecting radio waves so yes, birds, weather balloons and numerous other airborne objects can be picked up by radar. The makeup and construction of these objects can affect how well they reflect radar waves. This is basically the theory behind the stealth airplanes in use by the US military. By using materials that are radar wave absorbent, and using shapes to reflect the waves away from the transmitting radar set, they can make the plane appear much smaller than it is. Radars are generally set to ignore objects that are thought to be smaller than a certain size, thus filtering out objects such as birds and other items that the radar operator does not want to watch. As such, it is hoped that making a stealth aircraft appear small will make it so typical radar systems would ignore it as either noise, or too small an object to worry about. So while the things you mention can indeed show up on radar, they give off a very specific return that radar operators are trained to recognize, and they also adjust their sets to ignore objects below a certain size.
dagoth_jeff
Oct 6 2009, 09:52 PM
Isn't there a forum somewhere specifically for close-minded skeptics to further convince themselves that everything is accounted for, and that there is nothing more? Holy crap, man. What an interesting life.
If you deny the existence of cryptids based on eyewitness testimony, then you are saying the following: that everyone has made a mistaken identity, or everyone is a liar. Common sense would indicate that these two explanations cannot possibly fit into every story. I don't care who you are, or how many credentials you have.
You know what's disturbing? How many eyewitness testimonies don't get reported, for fear of ridicule by close-minded skeptics.
Now that's progress!
Furious_George
Oct 7 2009, 12:57 AM
I'm having a hard time understanding how you used the phrase "common sense" in that blanket statement. Do you believe that ALL crypids exist? And ALL stories are true? Or do you draw a line using "common sense"?
dagoth_jeff
Oct 7 2009, 07:36 PM
I didn't say I believe that every cryptid exists. Did I?
My use of common sense is that every witness in the world regarding a yet-unproven cryptid is not only 1)mistaken or 2)lying.
Did saying it twice make it sound any better?
Furious_George
Oct 7 2009, 09:45 PM
No
I asked those questions for a reason. Let me rephrase and I'll try not to default to name calling and wise remarks as you did. And I never said you said anything. I asked a few questions.
If you don't believe all stories, does it make you a close minded skeptic?
VAFooter
Oct 8 2009, 06:34 PM
QUOTE(Furious_George @ Oct 2 2009, 12:49 PM)

A flying thunderbird would get jets scrambled often. There would be lots of reports.
Or... maybe they eat bats and have radar jamming capabilities.
Actually, you are kind of on the mark. The reason aircraft return such great radar signatures is that they are made out of metal and composites. They reflect radar waves very well. One technique to reduce radar cross section is the use of radar absorbent materials. These materials reduce the amount of radar reflection. I would think that a large bird would have a smaller RCS due to the fact that skin, bones, and tissue are not great reflectors, at least not as good as metal. Therefore, a bird the size of a Cessna may look like an eagle or hawk on radar. Radars are programmed to filter out everything smaller than a certain size. Thus, even if a radar detected a T-bird, it may filter it our since it would not meet the required size for an aircraft. One other thing, if the bird was as big as a small plane and its RCS was not reduced, the controller would think that it was a small plane. Unless it strayed over restricted areas, no jets would be sent up to investigate. To the radar controller, it would be just another dumb civilian pilot who forgot to turn their radio on or something.
Saskeptic
Oct 9 2009, 09:36 AM
QUOTE(VAFooter @ Oct 8 2009, 07:34 PM)

Actually, you are kind of on the mark. The reason aircraft return such great radar signatures is that they are made out of metal and composites.
The story we're told with Doppler weather radar is that is picks up the water in birds' bodies. These signature show up very well despite the feathers.
VAFooter
Oct 9 2009, 12:24 PM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 9 2009, 09:36 AM)

The story we're told with Doppler weather radar is that is picks up the water in birds' bodies. These signature show up very well despite the feathers.
Right, but a return on a weather radar is not going to scramble jets or get the military involved. Also, do they have "controllers" for weather radar? I would think that there is probably not somebody monitoring it at all times, but only during severe weather. Civil and military air controllers are on duty 24/7. Do bird returns on Doppler show up different from rain, or just as a smaller "patch" of percipitation?
Furious_George
Oct 9 2009, 01:29 PM
I would guess that birds of this size don't have free range. Meaning they would probably seek out areas that have extremely strong thermal updrafts. And more importantly, return to the same area. Less locations means a greater chance of spotting one.
As far as radar and the scrambling of jets, if one of those things flew too close to a military base or a nuclear power plant just one time, over almost any country, we would know about them.
Those two things coupled lesson the chance of their existence. Not trying to be a close minded skeptic but these flying giant birds just don't have the places to hide as a BF. Their territory would be quite visible.
Saskeptic
Oct 9 2009, 01:52 PM
QUOTE(VAFooter @ Oct 9 2009, 01:24 PM)

Right, but a return on a weather radar is not going to scramble jets or get the military involved. Also, do they have "controllers" for weather radar? I would think that there is probably not somebody monitoring it at all times, but only during severe weather. Civil and military air controllers are on duty 24/7. Do bird returns on Doppler show up different from rain, or just as a smaller "patch" of percipitation?
The actual 1s and 0s I think look like rain, but you can identify birds by things like elevation. If the signatures are coming in from 500' but the ceiling is 1000', then it's not rain falling from those clouds. There are other idiosyncrasies related to the bird signatures, and I think our local meterologists will sometimes call these "ground clutter."
I bet air traffic controllers in fact are watching these images closely to avoid bird/aircraft collisions.
But, how a single teratorn-sized bird would be perceived, I don't know. Would it look like a drop of water the size of a cow?
Either way, Furious George is right - there ain't none of 'em no mo'. We'd know if there were.
TwoCrows
Oct 18 2009, 12:10 AM
On the topic of Thunder birds, a caller to Coast to Coast reported her sighting this way:
"Daisy in Spokane, Washington reported seeing what looked to her like a thunderbird. She said the low-flying creature had a shimmering, translucent copper color and was approximately the size of three cars. Daisy likened the experience to seeing a projection on a movie screen."
Furious_George
Oct 18 2009, 01:56 AM
Does the land in Washington create enough heat for large thermals or wind for dynamic soaring for such a large bird? I'm not familiar with the setting up there. I would think not often enough.
TwoCrows
Oct 18 2009, 06:16 PM
QUOTE(Furious_George @ Oct 18 2009, 01:56 AM)

Does the land in Washington create enough heat for large thermals or wind for dynamic soaring for such a large bird? I'm not familiar with the setting up there. I would think not often enough.
That's a good question George. I wondered the same things. Unfortunately there was'nt more to the report. Maybe someone in the Spokane area can add more.
Saskeptic
Oct 19 2009, 10:02 AM
QUOTE(TwoCrows @ Oct 18 2009, 01:10 AM)

"Daisy in Spokane, Washington reported seeing what looked to her like a thunderbird. She said the low-flying creature had a shimmering, translucent copper color and was approximately the size of three cars. Daisy likened the experience to seeing a projection on a movie screen."
Any possibility that "Daisy" was higher than a kite when she saw her "shimmering, translucent copper" thunderbird? That's a far more likely explanation than that she actually saw what she says she saw.
Incorrigible1
Oct 19 2009, 10:17 AM
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Oct 19 2009, 11:02 AM)

Any possibility that "Daisy" was higher than a kite when she saw her "shimmering, translucent copper" thunderbird? That's a far more likely explanation than that she actually saw what she says she saw.
Or a different shaped balloon than the saucer the idjit in Colorado had....
dreadcptflint
Nov 8 2009, 07:10 PM
QUOTE(TwoCrows @ Oct 18 2009, 01:10 AM)

On the topic of Thunder birds, a caller to Coast to Coast reported her sighting this way:
"Daisy in Spokane, Washington reported seeing what looked to her like a thunderbird. She said the low-flying creature had a shimmering, translucent copper color and was approximately the size of three cars. Daisy likened the experience to seeing a projection on a movie screen."
Yes, it can get quite hot enough to produce good thermals. Eastern Washington is an iragated desert. The North East portion of the state is quite rugid with out a huge population.
Matt
ShadowPrime
Nov 9 2009, 07:45 PM
I love the IDEA of Thunderbirds. I would like to believe they once existed, perhaps in the not so distant past. And I am smart enough to know I am NOT smart enough - or at least knowledgable enough! - to try and claim they DON'T exist. BUT...
Does seem to me to be a pretty hard sell. We can speculate that a creature like Bigfoot might be rare enough, smart enough, and reclusive enough, to take advantage of the more remote forested areas to hide out. Maybe. But a HUGE bird? Which would have no reason (that I can imagine) to develop "stealthy" behavior? Which would regularly and habitually (daily?) take to the air? Hard for me to imagine how (and why) such a huge, highly visible creature wouldn't have been "identified" by now.
Would LOVE to be wrong. Really. Just sayin'....
Shadow
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.