Judaculla
Apr 12 2004, 11:04 PM
Mr. Long,
I believe it would be worthwhile to verify the bodily measurements of Mr. Heironimus, so that more precise scaling can be done for comparison to the subject of the Patterson-Gimlin film.
Additionally, measurements can be compared to established parameters for humans to determine where Mr. Heironimus falls at various percentiles. Measures that differ significantly from the average for the human population may be more easily matched to the film subject.
If you are correct in identifying Mr. Heironimus as the subject of the Patterson-Gimlin film, independent confirmation of matches would strengthen your case considerably.
Under what conditions would you permit bodily measurements to be recorded and photographs to be taken by an independent expert in anthropometry for scientific comparison to the film subject?
Thank you.
bipto
Apr 13 2004, 05:31 AM
I'm going to pin this one for a while so Greg is sure not to miss it. Let's not respond to it so Greg won't get distracted by anything else we might say...
RogerKni
Apr 22 2004, 04:10 AM
All that's needed are posted photos of BH's arms & legs & shoulder-breadth alongside a yardstick. No outside expert is needed.
(I thought I posted this here three days ago, but it seems to have gotten lost somehow.)
RayG
Apr 22 2004, 06:43 AM
I heard Mr. H. was a 'puny little man' when compared to the creature in the Patterson film.

RayG
RogerKni
Apr 30 2004, 10:54 PM
SAAYYY .... We could use these arm-leg ratios and torso ratios to evaluate other supposed Bigfoot films! Probably hoaxers were unaware until recently of the importance of these ratios, especially the torso ratio. (Unfortunately, I don't think these other videos show their subjects with a sharply bent arm, the way Patty's is, so maybe they could fake the arm-leg ratio with arm extenders.)
The most realistic of the other videos I recall was the one preceded by a slightly goofy guy sharing his general thoughts about Bigfoot. The shot itself was of a creature about 50 feet away and 10 feet below the observer, walking from right to left along a mountainside, with most of its lower body concealed. It was in view for about three seconds. But the ratio of its torso to its other body parts could be evaluated.
Paul1968UK
May 1 2004, 01:09 AM
what part of " Let's not respond to it so Greg won't get distracted by anything else we might say... " Did you guys not understand ?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.