http://www.hauntedamericatours.com/NEWJERSEYBIGFOOT.php hey everyone give me your honest opinions replys about this new jersey possible sasquatch photo its interesting indeed.. good afternoon bill g please keep in touch ok

Another blob that could be anything from a person to a stump.

hey jim you might be right in your above reply but more research & enhandsments need to done to this photo. the person who took this photo needs to be contacted & interviewed. keep me posted ok

I have to go with jimf on this one bill... too blurry could be just about anything.

billgreen2005bigfoot,

Looks like an out-of-focus Ewok to me.

G. canadensis

classic blob

It's definitely not a great photo but I'll go with a man standing on a porch with his beagle.

Thanks for posting that Bill. I check everyday for new pics. It's the reason I signed up and I get a big kick out of it every time another one is posted.

The chances that it is a person are great. The folks that took the pic are from Long Island. When the millions of people from Long Island and the five boroughs of NYC want to go camping, they flood west into New Jersey. We can pretty much only go west to see trees and nature stuff. Usually during July and August is the best time to do it. It's the closest set of woods around and the Jersey woods become extremely dense with humans. I can't picture a BF being anywhere near this amount of people. The numbers of people in that small amount of woods during this time of year is huge.

blobbear

What the hell, am i the only one getting annoyed with these whack images. So damn blurry. Couldn't be bothered to read all of her story but this made me laugh, 'the picture pretty much tells the tale'. Lmao, shes acting like its some legitimate evidence.

It would be our luck that it really was a bigfoot and the camera was just crap! LOL

ROFLMAO keep the replys comeining indeed this is exciting & interesting hehe... ty bill g

You know each time I see one of these photos they are ALL blurry as all hell. Does anyone know how to use a cameras anymore? Or is the Big Guy using mind control to mess with the focus of the cameras? Who knows. Maybe we need cameras that has a very fast auto-focus. Have fun guys and gals

thats good above reply but email the person who took the possible photo for more questions indeed updates as this continues

I don't know why I even bother looking anymore....

Photography in the forest is difficult at best. The lighting conditions change continuously. The automatic features with digital cameras are great for everyday snapshots… but a digital camera set on auto in low light conditions will most likely give you a low shutter speed. Anything less than 125th of a second will probably yield a blobsquatch. From my experience most people keep their cameras on Auto and don’t even know what the other settings do.

Auto focus doesn’t always focus on what you want so this will yield a lot of fuzzy pictures also. Having said this, it is possible to get a good shot with the automatic features if all the variables come together for you. So far all we have is another fuzzy picture of Bigfoot.

I am an amateur photographer. I have a lot of experience with all types of photography. For these two examples I used a high quality digital SLR with manual settings and auto focus disabled. At first both pictures look real good until you look at the camera settings. I am using a rather high ISO at 1000, the aperture is wide at 5.6 (shallow depth of field) and the best shutter speed is still only 1/30 second. (Not fast enough to stop movement)

Both Pictures - Hand held

ISO Speed - 1000
Aperture - 5.6
Shutter Speed 1/30 sec.

If there was a animal moving in either of these pictures, taken at these settings, the animal would be blurry and or slightly out of focus due to the shallow depth of field. Another blobsquatch

Like I said “photography in the forest is difficult at best “It will take someone with a good quality camera and understanding of how the camera works in all lighting conditions. Oh!! Most importantly!! You will need a Sasquatch that is willing to sit still long enough to say “cheese “.

hey bob WOW very informative new above reply indeedy very interesting..

I need red circles drawn in different places. It's not a bigfoot until I see at least 5 different faces projected on to the photo. And stuff.

Good lord, the desperation of some to pick up bread crumbs and hope it's a meal.

Bill, I find the fact that you find that photo interesting, more interesting than the photo.

Thanks Bill .......

I'm constantly amazed at the ability of some people to find the worst possible camera equipment/conditions in which to take a photograph. It's almost more unbelievable to take a picture that bad, what with all of the really decent cameras available, than it is to accept that it's a Bigfoot.

hey raven & monkey tyyy for the above replys to me regarding this photo. i hope we see more opinions indeedy. ty bill g

That picture is of me. I was researching in the woods for BF, when I came across the elusive bigfoot photographer ...I couldn't get my camera out in time and he quickly got away. He managed to snap this photo of me.

If you don't buy that one, how about this one...
That photo is definitely a bigfoot, he appears exactly the same here as he has in thousands of other photos. The picture isn't poor quality, bigfoots are blurry.

hey pinelandsresearcher hehhe good above reply i think... ty bill g

Hi Bill. It looks too out of focus to really tell what it is.

hey twink i agree with your above reply LOL it realy needs more ehandsments research done with that photo indeedy . ty bill g