Pretty funny really. Everyone loved Steve Irwin for the way he narrated everything his way. This standard of research, videoing the walk in real time, with whispered narration as they go, is accepted if you're a Steve Irwin, but not if you're just some nobody on Youtube. Both Firstbillyjack and Tcsjrbigfoot are searching for something that isn't out open, like a croc, or a lion, or tiger. They're searching for something that is extremely intelligent, and seems to be almost impossible to find, when it knows you're out there. They keep the video going as much as possible, with the restrictions of Youtube upload size, cutting them into 5 minute or so, segments as they walk along. I wish they would leave the cams going at all times and cut the videos up at home, but hey. The stuff they're getting, is the same stuff that everyone else is getting out there, tree knocks, vocalizations of various kinds, tracks,,,,,,,,,,but they get laughed at because they're on Youtube, instead of in some established BF club, with nationally advertised meetings, and hooplah. The collection of "BF evidence", that I have, of theirs, is just as valid as any of the "evidence" other BF hunters have in their own collections. Many of the researchers out there don't even have evidence of their own, in a collection, yet they love to chastise these Youtubers, as being nothing but entertainment, with no content. But, that's ok. Everyone has an opinion. It's just funny, the hypocrisy shown, in this "bigfoot community". Guess you have to be a Rick, or Bill, or Owen, or Bob, or others who've done this for so long, and with nothing but the same evidence that these youtubers are getting, to get the same objectivity.
I'll continue to "follow" his work, work on enhancements for him, and send him suggestions, and yes, even chastisements, which I've sent when I see something that needs work. I'll do the same with anyone out there.
Ugh, too early for this, hehe
<blink>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,sip
I'll continue to "follow" his work, work on enhancements for him, and send him suggestions, and yes, even chastisements, which I've sent when I see something that needs work. I'll do the same with anyone out there.
Ugh, too early for this, hehe
<blink>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,sip
Nice post Grazhopper. TaHF (TCR and His Followers) are lucky to have you in his corner.
First off let me say I’m a big fan of Steve Irwin and have great respect for his work, his family, his life’s legacy. However his show with all its “Golly” and “Crikey Mate” exclamations was show business entertainment and intended to bring his serious research and message of wildlife conservation to a larger audience. He did this successfully increasing awareness around the globe and his impact will remain for a very long time. But the fact remains that what we saw on tv was not his serious research but his presentation of it.
I get the fact that you need to shoot a lot more than you need so you’re “on” when things happen. On a typical hike I will shoot 250 – 300 photos but I don’t put them all into a slideshow on photobucket and post them. The constant whispering etc is not only hokey it prevents one from hearing anything that could be going on. For the occasions where you say there are whoops and knocks I’ve missed them because I can’t take the narration. Let the sounds and images speak for themselves.
If in fact the motive is not recognition and entertainment but purely scientific discovery then the approach is all wrong. I know plenty of people who are talented, motivated and have the inclination to do well at their chosen pursuit but fail because they get in their own way and can’t execute. If in fact he is really on to something, then it is a damn shame because the approach is killing his credibility and here is a guy with enthusiasm, time and equipment.
I know its easy for someone to take shots and not offer a constructive solution so here’s my two cents…Let’s say hypothetically for the sake of argument I live near a suspected hotspot and follow the TaHF plan to the letter, my motives are pure scientific discovery and I am faced with the kind of criticism being levelled here, this is what I would do…
Issue a statement saying basically “message received and acknowledged”. Restate my motive of not wanting recognition and followers and take corrective action.
This would include:
- Taking everything off Youtube
- Host my own site where I can control quality and not be painted with the Youtube brush.
- Publish the name of my advisor/mentor and a statement about my commitment to scientific methods.
- Say I am learning and will adapt as required based on the need for credibility…and then do it as necessary.
- If there is a nugget buried in a clip then post the nugget only and ask if others can see or hear what I do without the constant nattering.
- Stop the gratuitous self-promotion
If however the motive is recognition and entertainment then I would keep on keeping on but not expect to be taken seriously. At the end of the day if serious legitimate research were a federal crime, then the Scooby Doo/Count Floyd approach would keep me sleeping at night because there is not a court in the land that would convict me. gerry
