Here is an excerpt of my quote and his reply,....

No human in the world could be as tall or as massively built,...I say the creatures height to be at least 10 to 12ft.
Unless these photos are doctored then I would have to say this is very real

support support
0 Zero doctoring , I stood a the foot of that stump
and its not a small stump.
and over 2 years all the sluff has fallen off.
When folks see the full Doc, I think they will be very moved.
Its a sad story really of something tragic happening to 2 very careing and easy goin people
they would give you the shirt off thier back.
Not any more!


I wasn't expecting an e-mail from this individual. I replied back to him. I have'nt received a reply back as of today
Re: support
I can't wait to watch the documentary!,..When does it premier and what TV Channel?
I really do believe your story and I think the Bigfoot community as a whole has been burned by too many hoaxes and cover ups over the years. I think your story will bring some much needed credibility to this phenomenon because you and I know these creatures exsist. I mean really,..You can't call every witness a liar and a hoaxer!
Have you been in touch with any Bigfoot organizations? BTW stay away from Tom Biscardi,...All indications are that he's nothing more than a fraud!

Steve

All indications are there was a coverup by Canadian and US officials. Ben has apparently dissapeared without a trace and the original video footage remains hostage by some Government agency.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-_H8nbCUYg...feature=channel

hey everyone wowww this awesome new documentary about sasquatch. when is comeing out on dvd . keep me posted please... thanks bill

The release date of this Documentry is sometime this month.

hey kokanee is this new sasquatch documentary dvd on amazon.com or other online stores yet. keep us posted ok. thanks bill

Busted by leemajors August 16th 2008, 7:32 PM post #508.
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?sho...gami&st=495

It might have been proven to be a costume elsewhere first, but this is where I found out.

I agree FG. The mask was outed by Lee Majors pretty quickly.

Kokanee, why do you believe this to be real from the youtube videos? The creepy goblin thing in one of the video's should be enough to convince you that this is a marketing ploy. Not much out there gets past the folks at BFF.

For entertainment purposes, I confess I would look forward to seeing the documentary, if the special effects are like the goblin.

It's the same as last time as far as I can see.

For information purposes I decided to reveal the e-mail I received from Helmsmaster, not form an opinion or make judgment whether I believe or not. There is nothing to my knowledge that this has been proven to be a fake or hoax. Maybe you should watch the documentary first and then make your judgment or conclusion.

What creepy goblin thing are you referring to exactly?

The pictures were proven as fakes beyond a reasonable doubt--as for the story? We'll see what the movie states, and take it from there.

hey everyone is this new sasquatch documentary dvd on amazon.com or on any other online stores if yes keep me posted ok good evening bill updates as this new situation continues

Is anyone here even aware that in the youtube video, it stated this footage is a dramatization of the confiscated video???? and that the mask in question was used for that purpose? The real footage was given to a forestry worker and was never returned or located remember???

So what? Because you tell us this story we're supposed to just believe it? Who are you?

If you don't have any positive or new information to bring to the table I suggest you keep your comments to yourself. This forum already has enough rhetorical comments as it is. Who I am is none of your business!

Ha ha ha -- ok, ok, but it's interesting how real photographic evidence always gets 'lost' somehow. It's all just hearsay anyway. Nobody will believe the story without some kind of proof. There are hundreds of these stories.

I don't know why, maybe they are ALL true, maybe not.

Without proof it's just another story. These pictures, as well done as they are, are only a 'recreation' of the originals.

Does anyone know why the original footage was supposedly turned over to the authorities? I'm only asking because I don't know all of the details.
Thanks!

Obviously, as the descriptive paragraph points out (although quite deliberately not in a particularly overt manner), this is merely a dramatization of supposedly 'real' events said to have occurred in October 2006. The tale has been kicking around for a while on the Internet. Gotta say the Ghillie suited monster is not particularly convincing; although I'm sure it's only supposed to 'approximate' the real thing; being a preliminary dramatization, after all.

Got to agree with 'Robert' above. I wouldn't even want to try to count the number of soon-to-be-forthcoming video and film 'proof' productions that have been promised over the years. (Yawn... I ran out of popcorn years ago....) As they say, 'Then another cow flew by.'
Dudlow

Edited to add: I should have pointed out that the purported sighting area and other locations mentioned tend to reflect the same Tri-Town corridor where the original (and now somewhat legendary) 'Yellow-Top' sasquatch sightings since the 1920s were said to have occurred. That would certainly provide a little provenance and mystical background for a modern film maker to take advantage of. In other words, the historical record would tend to support his modern day claims, just because there are reports from the area. Great for building sales if the movie ever comes out.

I don't mean to come off in that manner however I grow tired of some of the antics that members display in here. I take this subject very seriously and I always give people the benefit of the doubt no matter what and how frustrating it may be.

The pictures are NOT recreations,...The video footage is. The mask in question was used for the purpose of recreating the confiscated footage. A lot of members are overlooking this fact and drawing conclusions that this story is a hoax. Let the pieces fall where they may. If it turns out to be a hoax,...Oh well, it certainly won't be the last one!

Steve

Hi

Well thats better, Sure saves me some time thinking up a positive Peace response


Peace
Tim

No one knows why Ben Matine and Jim Jardineau gave the video I assume to be a video disc. To one of the local forestry worker's. That was just plain stupid on their part. Especially without making a copy of the video first.


Hi Bill,...I know as much as you do. Sorry!

Hi 'Kokanee'. The reason for my doubt about the still pictures and stating that the creature looks like a man in a Ghillie suit is that -- morphologically speaking and in terms of body proportions -- the hips on the creature in the still photos appear to be too high for a BF. The hips are about where they would be on a human figure. On one of the photographs, the hips actually stick out below a drawn in waist, creating the impression that the suit/costume is bunched at the waist/hip join area. In my experience BF have a rather long torso. Sorry, it simply looks too human and too un-BF like to me.

If this sounds unreasonable to you I would suggest having a look at the various body morphology estimates and diagrams published by Fahrenbach, Meldrum, Bindernagel and Krantz which also tend to reflect my own limited observations. That's why the still photos scream man-in-a-suit to me; but that's just me.
Dudlow

hey kokanee thats ok but i other people here in this great can keep us posted on this new documentary dvd etc. updates this continues

Oh, sure you do. Remember this?






And that's a no-no.

They already did... in the toilet.

But it's the truth! Isn't that what were all searching for?

I appreciate your scientific analysis but I'm basing my opinion on the sheer size, mass and height of the creature. Show me a 10' man on this planet that could fit into that size of suit?

Yep, This duck was cooked quite a while ago. I'm certain that two grown men with video of a sasquatch would just give it away to some "Official authority" without realizing the potential scientific and monetary gain to be had. This smacks of another "My dog ate it" type of excuse that always seems to follow these spectacular new discoveries/encounters. It's basically the only red flag you need to determine that's it's horse sh*t.

i still hope this new documentary dvd about bigfoot comes out real soon. please keep updated ok

Haha hey, you just copied and pasted this from another thread of yours. Is that legal?


http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?sho...2&start=792

post #799

I hate to say it, but when someone creates multiple accounts to try and pass off a guy in a costume as the real deal, they lose all credibility as far as I'm concerned. If he/they had come clean from the start and said that it's a reconstruction, now that would be a different story. I was originally going to take a look at this when it comes out, but I think I'll wait for reviews and opinions from the good folk here (if anyone actually watches it) to see if it's worth giving my hard earned dollars to a hoaxing sack of ****.

JMHO of course.

Cheers,

Kraig

lol,...shhhh,...please don't call the Police on me.