QUOTE(911Guy @ Mar 7 2010, 12:39 AM)

The way we can manipulate the image is amazing. It really is one of the reasons I can't say this film is a hoax. How would a "cowboy" from the 60's make such a film that we can play with over and over and not see a zipper or other evidence that this is a suit for sure. I really found your drawing interesting. If it is at all close no wonder witness's say that it has a human like appearance.
That is exactly what I think.
Patterson never would have imagined that we would stabilize the footage and zoom in and clear up so much detail..
if it were a suit they would have allowed small features to exist, taking for granted that we wouldn't be able to zoom in and get clarity.
But it's not a suit.
And if it is, we've zoomed in and garnered more than enough detail to prove it. And we haven't.
All we've been able to prove is that Patterson's Bigfoot is an authentic living creature. Reason #19823 why skeptics refuse to
really discuss the footage.