I want to first explain that - of course - everyone is entitled to their opinion, and this is just mine.

And, please - I could be wrong - this is just my observation.

It seems to me that there are some members that "Bash" the BFRO reports, with seemingly no background info but other than the fact that some (just some) of the members, new and old, tend to "bash" or believe other reports simply from where the report came from. TBRC or BFRO comes to mind.

Some of the members here at the BFF have perfect reason to "Bash" the BFRO regarding the authenticity of the reorts, but some of the other memebers really have no clue and just bash em. Some further explanation would helo. Again, everyone should be entitled to their opinion.

By NO MEANS am I defending the BFRO, but just pointing out what seems to me, a fact. Seems like folks jump on just to be part of the group. I could be wrong as said before, but perhaps the BFRO Report could end up being 50% real/adding to real reseaarch, and 50% BS reports. They can't be ALL hoaxed, right? Right?!?
Don't get me wrong, plenty of BFRO reports seem bog-gus, but all of them? Some seem to be great

FYI - never been on an Expedition, just the BFF forums, pretty much.

jumppppp jummmpp for your love jumpinn i just felt like singing for this new thread

I think having just one of these threads alive is one thread too many. Locked until further notice.

C