Found this on a website I think I am not allowed to name here.

Supposed to be a head shot, showing an eyeball , nostrils and teeth.

Freinds of mine say they can make it out of they step back ten feet from the screen.

I think that's a Patty enhancement, if you look closely you can see both coke bottles and a couple shape-shifters. great stuff!

Allegedly, the master photo was taken at 235 feet, and the head was found
in the bushes area, then enlarged and cropped for viewing.

Thus, it is not as sharp as if it were taken in your froint yard.


Jack

Tracker :rolleyes:

Don't waste your time trying to resolve an EB photo.



Robert

I said it as small as I could.

Supposedly, the photo is one of five frames taken in 1979.

This is long after Patty.



Jack

You gotta' drink alot of Scotch to be able to really see the image.

Reply: It seems to me that in this research, you should
view any new material on its own merit, unless you have some proof the person involved is an actual hoaxer.

Do you have any proof of that???? One musat get past

personal dislikes, etc, to get to the truth.,

I wait for any evidewnce that source has ever hoaxed anything.


Jack

You gotta' freakin' be kidding me! :rolleyes:

Well, at one time he posted enhancments that 'showed' a coke bottle as part of the sasquatch anatomy. Common sense dictates you can't put any weight in an opinion coming from this mind (being generous). I guess you could, but that would mean sasquatch has only been around as long as Coke has been bottling their drink. What happens to poor sassy when Coke only uses aluminun cans? yikes.

Ditto .


Just another crappy blobsquatch.

Ok like I ain't done this before
but here ya go Tracker Jack ( I am loading the photo into photoshop)
give me a minute ..............................





Here ya go!!!!

contrast/brightness adjusted and switched to greyscale.......
Human face with sunglasses.

There are other objects in the photo too

Any more ....... I like photo work.

I like you entusiasm to new evidence but check out your source.

No offense was meant by all of this just advice.

Robert

:rolleyes:

Seems to me you are confusing an __interpretation__ of a photo or things in it,

with the showing of a new photo....

Logically, tyhere is no real connection, and I respectfully suggest you re-thjink

your position...

Besides, with Patty, why couldn't she have been a pack-rat (saquatches

DO steal things from campsites) and have a coke bottle with her ---

it is shiny, and glassy and attractive...

So why not? Who are we to decide what a Bigfoot can or cannot do?

Let's use our logic that god gave us.

Jack

Do not forget that on this site, --- perhaps a veteran of this list can post the url -

there are master phjotos that show many tghing, not just this head alone.

The photo here is supposedly of a head, and a head only....

and many of my friends would not get theri larrd-butts off the computer chair

to walk back to see it more clearly, until one did get up to get more pizza
and coke, and then, walking in the room,, he called out:

"I see it, I see it!" on the speaker phone....

Besides, a PhD biologist, Dr Thomas Tomasi, now says the crittrers are not any known species.

SW Missouri State Univ. -- Biologist.

Jacko

Wait! Wait! I can see it! It's an expresso machine! No.........it's a snowcone maker!.....No.........it's a..........aw screw it!

Sorry tracker, but you are wrong. What Mr. Tomasi said (per our good buddy JimF asking him) was:



Doesn't sound to me like he's being commital at all.

And, there's a big difference in being naive and being ignorant. Just what makes you think that anything on the website of a proven troll and probable lunatic has any veracity at all?

Sorry, you did not falsely darken it enough... heck, I can make it look like

Barbara Steisand if I try, but then this is falsifying.... isnt it? Is this all a joke to you? Or research??? Is this the tone of the forum - jokes?



The eyeball and eylid still show thru, and besides, dude, since when do humans

have NO CHIN????

aLSO a long nasal passage from between the eyes and down to the nostils
just above the mouth, which does ahve teeth...

Best regards,

Jacko

Time to run an IP check. This is beginning to smell more like trolling than anything else.

This isn't a photo - its a Rorschach inkblot test.

A gullible mind could see anything they want to in it. :rolleyes:

-Ray

:rolleyes:

As I read his letter, he said he had not been at the site, and had not personally
seen any creatures walking abouitn there.

The man is VERY,very brave to say ANYHTING AT ALL......

and the imagfes, some 17, do not look hominid...

they look HOMINOID ------------

whcih is quite different.

You have to remember he is opening his professional life to incredible flack

byu making his limited conservative statement.

He has a job and family to protect.... respect that.

He just says they do not look like any existing species.

That is all....

Jacko......

Let me repeat myself:

<<Just what makes you think that anything on the website of a proven troll and probable lunatic has any veracity at all?>>

ok. at the risk of sounding like the goob that i am,

what the heck are you looking at that makes you see a face, human or otherwise? i cant make out a thing in that photo.....

gael

Dr Tomasi does say tht some of the cresatures

do bear some semblance to primates in general, even if not all of them,
but this is a new field and new images..

There is one new image of a younger creature, standing up, with head and torso showing, that has a nose like a gorilla -- with reverse
mirror-image curlicques in the nose ... called "Peter-g", as a code name.

Not bad for a 110 neg photo, enlarged and cropped....

Shot by a Judy Grant, NOT by xx.

wacko Jacko

A study by ther Americdan Optomical Society (eye drs)

shows that 30% of the us poipularion is blind as a bat.

Go ask your ten yr old brother to look.... kids all see it.



wacko-jacko

try this image....

nine feet tall!!!!!!!!

Jacko

well, pixels are too large on this forum page...

but you can maybe make out the head of a chimp-like critter

resting on the shoulder of the adult.

all have blond hair --

'OLD YELLOW-TOP"????

Surfaces again....

Jacko

Maybe Jim F will post the url here.

I am new and chicken to offend anyone.



Jacko

O.K. Jack how about following your own advice :rolleyes:

He don't know us very well do he?

hey now! i'm ONLY 40!!! cheese-n-fries. you think it's cuz i'm old that i cant see it?

after a quick lol to your reply, i sensibly asked my younger sister (age 34) what SHE saw, and she didnt see anything either, 'cept the profile of a bear or something in the uppermost dark splotch, facing the left, mouth slightly ajar. which i dont think is what you're referring to.

being 40 i dont have a 10 year old brother

silly me

all i'm asking is for someone to please put up lines or a guide for me and my old eyes to go by.

gael

Hi Judy--- you are on Loren's list.

Well, ask your NEOIGHBOR'S KID to come in....

and once again,

stand back 12 feet and look.

This is a HEad, and it is looking at your left shoulder, as it were...

your mistake is looking too close----- back away!

ast some point, it will "pop kinto view" for yew....

or print it, put it on fridge, and one day, you will suddenly see it....


Do not gived up.


Lo Loco Jakco

Gael,

Don't worry about it. There's nothing to see so you're not missing anything.

Sorry, I haved bneen following this board for years.

I do know you. I also know some of the users fairly well by other

boards, emails and sources.


I do, I do.......

I dodododododod doo doo.



Jacko

The owner of those pictures is an admited hoaxer. He has posted a confession on his own site. You are behind the times "Trackerman"

Case closed.

Love,
Martin

What site? What person? What admission? Where? When?

Quote??? Post your evidence..... do not accuse with no proof.

Show us your proof, sir!

Wacko Jacko

He was also charged with copywrite infringment by the Fed's for attempting to sell bootleg copies of Jaw's.

You should think about your sources TrackerMan.

Hugs and Kisses,
Martin

Read his site it's all, there.

You should read the whole site before you make comments.

Look and you will find i5t.

Your Pal,

Martin

gmtm

dude, are you thinking i'm judy? or was that part to someone else?

gael

(checking again)

yup, gael

Bill Assmussen has debunked all of X.X.'s photo's. After being debunked by Bill, XX then admitted to wishful thinking and thank Bill for showing him the light.

With a brain like Memorex,

Martin

you should visit X.X.'s site and find his confession. Please remember: read the whole thing and no just one page.

Whoa....

This thread has stink all over it......

Good advice.

If you can logically explain:

• why Patty would have pockets on her arms/legs (since she didn't have a coke bottle in her hand)...
• how you can interpret an ink blot/blob photo as a bigfoot...
• how you can possibly use the word LOGIC when speaking of EB...

Then, and only then, might you be on to something.

RayG

me thinks this is EB

Yes, I agree. It not only stinks, but the blob also looks like what I cleaned out of the kitty litter box this morning.

who left the door open and let the Loon in?

Cedrip?

Cedrip, is that YOU??? Well shush ma mouff and blow me down!!!

Cedrip has a big crush on me ya know...

RayG

It is. And he's soooooooo outta' here!

Is it really?

Martin

Well, even if it isn't, it may as well be. He's outta here anyway.

[edit] For the record, I do not know that tracker888 is our good friend Erik, but I suspect it is. If you want to know for sure, go check out his forum. Last time I tossed him out, he went a little (more) nuts about it...

Oh I get it!! This is like those pictures at the mall. Remember all those people standing around squinting. Then you would hear someone exclaim "I see it!!" Those gave me a headache. :rolleyes:

So this is the infamous EB eh? Well I give him and his so called picture. Four blobs.