Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: A Big Find: Huge fossilized footprint found...
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media > News & Magazine Articles
tugboatwa
http://www.herald-citizen.com/index.cfm?ev...710A84BD9BC8C58
QUOTE
A Big Find: Huge fossilized footprint found
Click to view attachment
Harold Jackson of Cookeville measures a mysterious footprint he found near the Caney Fork River. Herald-Citizen Photo/Camille Fliss

Megan Trotter - Herald-Citizen Staff - Saturday, Aug 30, 2008

COOKEVILLE -- Harold Jackson of Cookeville was walking with a friend along the property he owns along the Great Falls Lake above the Caney Fork River when they both noticed something strange -- an impression in a nearby rock.

"(My friend said) 'That looks like a footprint.' I had seen it before, but I didn't think anything about it," said Jackson. "But then when my friend said that, I got to looking at it, and sure enough, (I thought), 'It's got to be a footprint.'"

Jackson pried the fossilized print up from the surrounding rock and brought it home. As he rinsed off the mud, he was impressed at the detail in the impression. Not only was the outline of the foot clear, but also the impression of the toes, the heal and the ball of the foot. Looking at it from the side, he could see where the weight of the walker had pressed the now hardened mud tightly together directly under the print, whereas the fossilized mud down deeper was not as closely packed.

After studying it closely, Jackson is still unsure of what the footprint is from, but whatever it was, it was big.

"This is 11 inches across and 15 inches (long). And my foot's about four and a half by about 10," he said.

One of his theories is that the print might have come from a Native American. In the area where he found the print, he has found many artifacts such as arrow heads, ancient tools and even cave paintings.

"But if this was an Indian, he was a very big Indian," said Jackson.

Another theory is that it is from some kind of animal, though Jackson has no ideas as to what kind of animal it might be. The print itself appears human except for something that looks like a claw mark near the heal. Jackson suggests it might be something like a dewclaw, an undeveloped claw or digit commonly found on mammals such as dogs, cattle and deer.

However, the print is clearly not from any of these animals.

"This kind-of makes me believe in Bigfoot," said Jackson.

In a recent trip back to the site where the print came from, Jackson came across what he believes may be the print of the right foot. This one is fossilized in a much larger rock - one Jackson is unable to pull out. So for now it remains where he found it.

Jackson plans to keep the footprint that he was able to pull up, however he is willing to let scientists study it.

"I'm not wanting any credit or anything for it. I just found it and thought it might be interesting to the people to see this," he said. "I've never seen anything like it."
billgreen2005bigfoot
this is a very informative new article about a new fossilized footprint found indeed.
WmRoy
I wish it was a better photo. Looks like too much arch for a common BF print..........
hopeful
Very interesting! How long does it take for something to fossilize? Haven't there been dinosaur footprints discovered that were fossilized?

Also, I wonder how we can find out which/if scientists get to study it and what their conclusions might be.
Tirademan
I've found several old stories about fossilized footprints found in rock...I'll look around later to see if I can find them.

Here's a bigger picture from their website.

tirademan
ThisIsJack
QUOTE
In a recent trip back to the site where the print came from, Jackson came across what he believes may be the print of the right foot. This one is fossilized in a much larger rock - one Jackson is unable to pull out. So for now it remains where he found it.

Jackson plans to keep the footprint that he was able to pull up, however he is willing to let scientists study it.

"I'm not wanting any credit or anything for it. I just found it and thought it might be interesting to the people to see this," he said. "I've never seen anything like it."


Just curious, what do you think the worth of this witness and this possible evidence, longtabber?
Choctaw
That just doesn't look right. It has a deep grove between the ball of the foot and the instep. It was cut awfully close to the print itself. I sure would like to get a good look at the bottom of that "rock".

I'm betting it was poured from a form. new_thumbsdownsmileyanim.gif


Choctaw
RedRatSnake
Hi

I know it says it was pried from the rock, ( like he just took a screwdriver and poped it out) But that ain't really how it works if i have been watching my Discovery channel shows right, ( I am sure you guys are way a head of me ) What he has must have taken a long time to remove and many many hours just making sure things were going right, I would have taken half the rock, Not just such a small sample, I am not going for this just yet

Peace
Tim thumbup.gif
Volsquatch
I think we should get Verne Langdon to comment, then re-title this thread to "A Big Ass Find: Huge fossilized footprint found..."
Hairy Man
Well a couple of thoughts:

1. what kind of rock is it? For it to be a true representation of a footprint, the "walker" would have had to walk across a medium that then became "stone"...so what is the material?

2. Why did he remove it? Provenance is everything...remove evidence from the scene of the crime and all you have is a nice story.

3. Has any professional examined it??
billgreen2005bigfoot
this new footprints discovery is now realy makeing big internet news headlines. now this is kind of media the bigfoot community realy likes to see indeed. thanks bill smile.gif
rockinkt
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Sep 2 2008, 08:28 PM) *
Well a couple of thoughts:

1. what kind of rock is it? For it to be a true representation of a footprint, the "walker" would have had to walk across a medium that then became "stone"...so what is the material?

2. Why did he remove it? Provenance is everything...remove evidence from the scene of the crime and all you have is a nice story.

3. Has any professional examined it??


Even though you said you were only going to post a couple of thoughts but got carried away and made three wink.gif - I'm still going to agree with your post.
Not enough info at this point in time.
vilnoori
Doesn't look very much like this one, does it:

http://anthropology.si.edu/humanorigins/ha/laetoli.htm

If it is indeed a fossil footprint I think it is of some animal--a same side, front-and-rear track. Almost like a bear, but there could be several other animals that could have made it that we don't know much about, probably many thousands of years ago.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.