QUOTE(rockinkt @ May 17 2008, 11:38 AM)

Nobody credible would ever use the old " I ran out of film" (in this case video tape) excuse - would they?
edit double post
Yes thats right.
After viewing it sometimes more I now think I get the answer.
New Pro: (edits in generell)
If someone would ask me (lets emagie Iam not into BF), as a filmmaker, how to bring 15 Minutes of such stuff on youtube, I would edit it in a simular way. Youtube is screeming for attraction not for sientific documentation. Although if you have something real I also wouldn´t show the good parts (if there are any) right away (money, you know). And even if you are wanting to show it to BF people whats an easier way than to upoad it to youtube or simular. If someone is realy interessted, he can come an screen it. But first he needs a teaser to hook up.
New (killer) con:
The cuts themselself doesn´t look idiotic, it seems someone even tried a so called invisible cut, what needs a bit of knowledge. I would say someone into film/video was involved at least regarding the editing. As the cameraman tries what everyone here wanted him to do, zooming in and stick to it for, as it seems, a long time (several minutes) it also points to a trained cameraman, it doesn´t have to be a pro but at least not my sister. But this pro kind of things are most of the time red flags. I saw some videos with the same flaws, the pros trieing to play amateur just can´t shake of their proffesion.
All in all, I now say its a hoax. Or maybe a students project. This due the fact that it realy seems to be a recreation. This is obvious as a natural encounter at this disstance with an amateur at the cam wouldn´t had brought up that much footage (needing editing). If you want to recreate something you usualy stretch time (and dramatise), to give the narration time to discribe and bring the viewer deeper into the wittnesses emotional state. Anybody knows it from documentaries, as they have to play the PGF several times until the narrator has said what he has to. The stupid movement of the creature shows that they aren´t real pros as they edited it the wrong way around. They obviously done it to get a kick at the end. If you take the (I think) last shot of it, "seeing" the cameraman and hiding, as beginning and than hiding, sitting, followed by standing up and moving away it would be right. Out of some reason they want to hold the best shot for the end, they doesn´t followed the three act built up code. To have the kicker at the end by any price shoes premature filmmaking skills, maybe they even filmed it right and then screwed it up in the edit. I think students who doesn´t believed their teachers are the source of this one. But a nice costume anyway.
CU