These videos were posted by the same youtube user:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIIgGtpcG94...feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEQKiAIe6dk...feature=related (same footage as first video; 'BF' appears at the very end in real time, not slow-mo)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_eNxMdqmw0
Looks to me like they have a suit made up and their trying it out to see how it sells. Notice there is absolutely no difference in the alleged sasquatch in either video, it's like they filmed the exact same animal on two occasions. I think the 'animal' is a paid actor, myself.
Hi
The 3rd video was pretty cheesy looking
Peace
Tim
The 3rd video was pretty cheesy looking
Peace
Tim
The more of these fakes I see on youtube the more I am convinced of the validity of the PG film. None of the attempted hoaxes come close to providing the detail as the PG film.
But check out the frames around 38 thru 40 on the first slow-mo video. The silhouette is right and I don't see the 'actor' looking down like you often see in hoaxes during running sequences. The mask impedes their view of where their feet are going and they tend to stumble over ground litter instead of glide through thick underbrush like this 'creature' seems to. 'He' just seems too steady on his feet for the usual hoax 'look'.
I also noticed that the arms seem longer than monkey-suited actor's arms and at one point when the 'creature' is vaulting over the log, I definitely saw the fingers on the free hand articulate, meaning they aren't fake hands used to extend the arm length. Well, that and 'he' actually uses his right hand to support the vault.
I also liked the hair. It didn't have that costume hair feel to it. I know that our costume expert friend told us that longer hair is easier to work with, but I like that there are different lengths, not just long and that the long hair seems to be 'in the right places' -- like arm fringes and shoulders -- and not in the convenient spots that would conceal bad costume component integrations.
On the third video, I thought I saw some muscle movement in the buttocks and part of the back and there is a split second where we see the bottom of a foot. Is that a shoed foot? And again, I find the movement to be really natural and smooth.
The parts that have me really doubting is that I sense an almost human athleticism, like a quarterback's springy run, and not the juggernaut feeling I think I should see. But I've never seen a BF run, so... And the chest isn't barrel shaped. The torso should be thicker in my opinion, more massive. I think it's the chest and the almost human facial features that make BF's so damn unnerving to encounter out in the woods. If they looked more like gorillas in the face and more like chimps thru the chest, we'd probably have less of a visceral response to them! In the videos, we can't see the face, but the chest is definitely more sinewy like a huge chimp's.
I also noticed that the arms seem longer than monkey-suited actor's arms and at one point when the 'creature' is vaulting over the log, I definitely saw the fingers on the free hand articulate, meaning they aren't fake hands used to extend the arm length. Well, that and 'he' actually uses his right hand to support the vault.
I also liked the hair. It didn't have that costume hair feel to it. I know that our costume expert friend told us that longer hair is easier to work with, but I like that there are different lengths, not just long and that the long hair seems to be 'in the right places' -- like arm fringes and shoulders -- and not in the convenient spots that would conceal bad costume component integrations.
On the third video, I thought I saw some muscle movement in the buttocks and part of the back and there is a split second where we see the bottom of a foot. Is that a shoed foot? And again, I find the movement to be really natural and smooth.
The parts that have me really doubting is that I sense an almost human athleticism, like a quarterback's springy run, and not the juggernaut feeling I think I should see. But I've never seen a BF run, so... And the chest isn't barrel shaped. The torso should be thicker in my opinion, more massive. I think it's the chest and the almost human facial features that make BF's so damn unnerving to encounter out in the woods. If they looked more like gorillas in the face and more like chimps thru the chest, we'd probably have less of a visceral response to them! In the videos, we can't see the face, but the chest is definitely more sinewy like a huge chimp's.
I don't mean to sound too jaded, but it's seems like every single thread I get interested in ends that way. Only the boring ones die a natural death, I fear. The fun ones often get beaten to death over off-topic crap I'm noticing. But the thread you just posted was closed over some off-color remarks made by one poster which, granted were in bad taste but, seemed to be made in just good-natured fun... weird that the moderator thought that that was too much. Oh well. I would've liked to have seen where that discourse would've led if left to run its natural course. I thought the posters were doing an overall decent job of debating for and against the video being real. Bummer.
Maybe the moderators will allow some discussion on the videos to continue here, considering we have a lot of new members with new opinions to be heard. 
Or...........maybe not.
Or...........maybe not.
QUOTE(mkianni @ Apr 5 2008, 10:00 PM) 
Hi
well i have been drinking a few beers tonight so having to piss again ain't a problem
Peace
Tim
Note that the organization's website appears to be gone.. that usually is a red flag.
You'll notice that when "Bigfoot" vaults over the log he goes tumbling down the hill on his ass 
I could never understand why that last thread was closed.
I could never understand why that last thread was closed.
at least it seems that they put some effort into this hoax, I am getting tired of all the youtubers who don't
even try.
even try.
hey researchers the first 2 filmfootages of the reddish brown sasquatch could be authentic but more research enhandsments need to done. the other filmfootage i didnt see anything in it. but contact the people who took the filmfootages of the reddish brown sasquatch to get more answers etc. thanks bill
If you notice at the end of this video it says. www.studiodrome.com, I checked out the website and the stated purpose of the website:
Studiodrome is created to focus on producing movies.
It is a better than average fake.
Studiodrome is created to focus on producing movies.
It is a better than average fake.
QUOTE(Le Petit Pied @ Apr 5 2008, 09:50 PM)
But check out the frames around 38 thru 40 on the first slow-mo video. The silhouette is right and I don't see the 'actor' looking down like you often see in hoaxes during running sequences. The mask impedes their view of where their feet are going and they tend to stumble over ground litter instead of glide through thick underbrush like this 'creature' seems to. 'He' just seems too steady on his feet for the usual hoax 'look'.
I also noticed that the arms seem longer than monkey-suited actor's arms and at one point when the 'creature' is vaulting over the log, I definitely saw the fingers on the free hand articulate, meaning they aren't fake hands used to extend the arm length. Well, that and 'he' actually uses his right hand to support the vault.
I also liked the hair. It didn't have that costume hair feel to it. I know that our costume expert friend told us that longer hair is easier to work with, but I like that there are different lengths, not just long and that the long hair seems to be 'in the right places' -- like arm fringes and shoulders -- and not in the convenient spots that would conceal bad costume component integrations.
On the third video, I thought I saw some muscle movement in the buttocks and part of the back and there is a split second where we see the bottom of a foot. Is that a shoed foot? And again, I find the movement to be really natural and smooth.
The parts that have me really doubting is that I sense an almost human athleticism, like a quarterback's springy run, and not the juggernaut feeling I think I should see. But I've never seen a BF run, so... And the chest isn't barrel shaped. The torso should be thicker in my opinion, more massive. I think it's the chest and the almost human facial features that make BF's so damn unnerving to encounter out in the woods. If they looked more like gorillas in the face and more like chimps thru the chest, we'd probably have less of a visceral response to them! In the videos, we can't see the face, but the chest is definitely more sinewy like a huge chimp's.
I also noticed that the arms seem longer than monkey-suited actor's arms and at one point when the 'creature' is vaulting over the log, I definitely saw the fingers on the free hand articulate, meaning they aren't fake hands used to extend the arm length. Well, that and 'he' actually uses his right hand to support the vault.
I also liked the hair. It didn't have that costume hair feel to it. I know that our costume expert friend told us that longer hair is easier to work with, but I like that there are different lengths, not just long and that the long hair seems to be 'in the right places' -- like arm fringes and shoulders -- and not in the convenient spots that would conceal bad costume component integrations.
On the third video, I thought I saw some muscle movement in the buttocks and part of the back and there is a split second where we see the bottom of a foot. Is that a shoed foot? And again, I find the movement to be really natural and smooth.
The parts that have me really doubting is that I sense an almost human athleticism, like a quarterback's springy run, and not the juggernaut feeling I think I should see. But I've never seen a BF run, so... And the chest isn't barrel shaped. The torso should be thicker in my opinion, more massive. I think it's the chest and the almost human facial features that make BF's so damn unnerving to encounter out in the woods. If they looked more like gorillas in the face and more like chimps thru the chest, we'd probably have less of a visceral response to them! In the videos, we can't see the face, but the chest is definitely more sinewy like a huge chimp's.
Good points however since we never get to see the face of the Sasquatach the costume could have huge eye openings making visibility good. Notice they're not providing any footage of tracks or the path the creature took. Also the way the creature moves dosn't display the mass associated with the weight that its size implys suggesting that its a costume and not heavy massive flesh and blood.
QUOTE(billgreen2005bigfoot @ Apr 7 2008, 09:22 PM)
hey researchers the first 2 filmfootages of the reddish brown sasquatch could be authentic but more research enhandsments need to done. the other filmfootage i didnt see anything in it. but contact the people who took the filmfootages of the reddish brown sasquatch to get more answers etc. thanks bill
I agree Bill. We have been made gun-shy from the BF fakers, that when the real things comes along we throw it into the fake bin. We need not be so hasty. The videos could be authentic or fakes, since there is no way for me to tell. The BFs look real to me and nothing jumps out that says fake. Most fakes on utube are obvious to me. Why go through the trouble to get someone dressed up, then shoot a 15 second video, and post it on utube? If I was going to through all of this effort, I would make a 10 minute interesting, gripping realistic video.
The video photographer needs to be interviewed by one of us before I will pass judgement. At this point I say.....................very interesting.
QUOTE(mkianni @ Apr 5 2008, 09:00 PM)
I'm shocked to hear that! Shocked I tell you!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.