Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Peter Byrne, MK, and the Paranormal?
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media > News & Magazine Articles
Hairy Man
http://www.sweethomenews.com/news/results.cfm?story_no=7373

QUOTE
Bigfoot believers back

Published: August 29, 2007

By Sean C. Morgan

Of The New Era

That rustling in the underbrush might be Bigfoot. Or it might not.

But one Bigfoot hunter, a structural engineer from Portland who refused to be identified except by his first name, Neil, thought that it probably was one of the elusive creatures Saturday night as he traveled logging roads above Longbow Organizational Camp on the Sweet Home Ranger District.

He was among a couple dozen Bigfoot believers and researchers who got together at Longbow campground for the annual International Bigfoot Society campout last weekend.

They spent Saturday evening comparing notes and giving presentations on their work. Following the presentation, Neil, along with Ray Rosa and Shelly Binkley of the Sasquatch Mystery Center in Grants Pass, decided to head up the hill on a short expedition to find Bigfoot mainly to demonstrate how they look for Bigfoot. They took along a reporter.

Those attending the camp believe Bigfoot exists but they're not necessarily together on exactly what Bigfoot might be. Some believe Bigfoot is a relative of the ape while others believe it may be a type of human. Others think that Bigfoot is an inter-dimensional, supernatural creature.

Probably half of the Bigfooters at the camp subscribe to the inter-dimensional theory, said Patti Reinhold of Sweet Home. She did not say what her opinion was.

The campout is open to Bigfoot believers in general, a place where they can relax and share what they've seen and learned, she said.

Neil is among those who think Bigfoot is inter-dimensional, meaning it exists in "dimensions" next to and twice removed from our own. That means most of the time the creatures are invisible in our dimension, so even though they are common, they are rarely seen.

Binkley explained that she is open to the idea based on some of the things that she has seen on expeditions.

The first stop was perhaps a mile above Longbow. Neil set speakers on top of his SUV. With a night scope and a remote switch to the speakers in hand, everyone got as quiet as possible.

Neil triggered recordings that he said were of Bigfoot screams and howls from the Estacada and Lake Tahoe areas. The first call was immediately answered by a strange howl.

"That was obviously a coyote," he said. After listening a little longer for evidence of visitors from another dimension, he said that site was exhausted.

He moved up the road a little more than a mile, attempting to reach an area that hadn't been touched by the previous Bigfoot calls. He triggered the sounds again. This time, there was some rustling in the nearby underbrush along with the occasional soft whistling sound. It soon grew quiet except for the buzzing and chirping of insects.

Based on three years of experience, Neil said he thought it was likely a Bigfoot, but Sasquatches are shy and cautious. There may have been too many cars and people for it to show itself. He didn't think it was a deer or other animal because a deer tends to run away.

Rosa and Binkley headed back for camp while Neil tried one more spot another mile up the road but to no avail.

Among those attending the campout was Peter Byrne, one of the top researchers in the field and author of "The Search for Bigfoot: Monster, Man or Myth." He has appeared in numerous documentaries on Bigfoot.

As presenters made claims, he quietly questioned them about their more startling claims, asking about documentation.

M.K. Davis, a Mississippi man who has been digitally cleaning up images from the controversial 1967 Patterson-Gimlin film of a Bigfoot female in Northern California, explained that he has moved far beyond where he was two years ago, when he first presented his work at the Longbow campout.

"Things I had two years ago are far behind now," he said. His images from the film are better and higher quality; and he still hasn't been able to find anything artificial about the Bigfoot in the image. In the process, he believes he has uncovered another Bigfoot in the film. It is the size and shape of a Bigfoot, but it is far from certain. He pegs the chances of it being a second Bigfoot at about 80 percent.

Others have noticed a Bigfoot "arm" apparently reaching around a tree in the film, he said. He has checked that out too, but it never moves. If it is a Sasquatch arm, it doesn't move and he can't confirm it's a Sasquatch.

"A lot of people have made a lot of claims about this film," Davis said. "It's grainy, dark. I think four or five people have claimed to be the creature, but if they've seen what I've seen in it, they wouldn't risk it (the claims).

"It's something I've enjoyed doing."

He has had help, he said, expressing gratitude for those who have given him assistance.

Davis is preparing to put his findings together into a presentation and is planning on working with Don Monroe of Montana on a book to be released next year.

Monroe is in the camp that believes Bigfoot is a type of human. Monroe thinks there are four varieties of them, partly Neanderthal, Monroe said.

Joe Belart shared stories about his research in the area between Estacada and Detroit in recent years. He has explored 63 incidents in that area, he said. Among stories in the area is a farm family just outside of Estacada that started planting corn in 1955.

"They had to quit planting sweet corn because ‘the beast with big feet' would come in and eat the corn," he said.

Belart said he talked to a Forest Service employee, who told a story from 1967. The man was nearly finished changing a tire on his pickup when a Bigfoot walked across the road in front of the pickup, looked at him and then walked up the hill on the other side of the road.

"He became so distraught he jumped in the truck and drove off his jack," Belart said.

Forest Service employees are notoriously tight-lipped about Bigfoot, he said, but he has been able to talk with a few who have seen things.

Rosa and Binkley announced plans for a late-September expedition to an area in Southern Oregon where, they said, their group has spotted several Bigfoot. They invited others to join them on the three-day trip.

Rosa described the trouble he has been having getting a photo.

The Bigfoot have broken cameras and sometimes used sticks to drag food out of the bait piles without being seen by the motion-sensitive cameras, Rosa said. They may be shy, but they've also left "gifts" behind in exchange, including a pile of mushrooms.

Joey Lowell of Salem has not clearly seen a Bigfoot. He said he has found tracks, heard roaring, seen trees snapped off at 12 to 14 feet from the ground, and gotten responses to tapping, banging a branch on a tree.

Though these stories may sound preposterous to some. To people like Monroe, Bigfoot hunting and these stories are important.

He has evidence, such as unidentified hair samples taken from caves; but most people don't like the implications, he said.

"You're the small percentage that thinks outside of the box. You‘re the few that dare to say the ‘h--- with the world,'" a world where governments cover things up and people choose to live in the dark.

"It's an adventure," he said. "It's a quest and lonely too."

It's people like those at the campout, people who want to know the answers to questions, who can get to the truth, he said. "People like me, like yourselves, are a different breed."
Apeman
I always love this:
QUOTE
In the process, he believes he has uncovered another Bigfoot in the film. It is the size and shape of a Bigfoot, but it is far from certain. He pegs the chances of it being a second Bigfoot at about 80 percent.


80% chance = "far from certain". At last he's hanging out with the right audience.
Dad
I don't know...a lot of people joke about the work he's (MK) doing....but in my eye's there ain't much else going on so as long as the results are viewed with an open mind it can't hurt to look.......
billgreen2005bigfoot
hey kathy & everyone this is a great new article about sasquatch. good afternoon. bill thumbup.gif
Bitter Monk
QUOTE(Dad @ Oct 9 2007, 12:23 PM) *
but in my eye's there ain't much else going on.......


That's just because you aren't hanging out with the right people yet. wink.gif
Dad
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Oct 9 2007, 03:59 PM) *
That's just because you aren't hanging out with the right people yet. wink.gif



Sam's Town is not around the block...but not totally out of the question someday wink.gif........
Melissa
faint.gif

Someone tell me this is a joke....

Patty is human, has bullet holes, and not to mention the various body "parts" that can be seen only through the enhancements done by MK Davis - now this?? Well, things may be dull for some, but this is just silly. Are there not other pieces of footage out there for MK and others to work on? Is this the only film that has ever been called "possible footage of a bigfoot" ???

Good grief.
Dad
I'd like to see him work on the Freeman Footage.....I know Paul Freeman had a few questionable claims.....but his film footage is very interesting to me......
Melissa
It would be nice DAD - but I wont hold my breath. I just dont understand why he focuses so much on the Patterson film.
FredSneakers/David
rolleyes2.gif rolleyes2.gif rolleyes2.gif
JohnCartwright
laugh.gif
QUOTE(Melissa @ Oct 10 2007, 06:47 AM) *
It would be nice DAD - but I wont hold my breath. I just dont understand why he focuses so much on the Patterson film.


because Patty has nice boobies?
rockinkt
ohmy.gif icon_really_happy_guy.gif
micahn
For patty
flowers02.gif
moregon
QUOTE
Probably half of the Bigfooters at the camp subscribe to the inter-dimensional theory, said Patti Reinhold of Sweet Home. She did not say what her opinion was.


The following is MY OWN PERSONAL OPINION and does not reflect the beliefs, thoughts or opinions of anyone else.

The Inter-Dimensional Theory is poppycock!

Theories are guesses decorated with a fancy name, and not all theories are based on facts. Unless the theory is based on facts the words Theory, Opinion and Speculation can all be used interchangeably. First of all where is there any proof that any dimension outside of those already known to man even exist? Even if science says something COULD exist doesn't mean it DOES exist until there's proof to support it. I think all of us agree that IF bigfoot exists is something of a tangible nature as it appears to occupy space and have mass. There have never been any reports, to the best of my knowledge, of a bigfoot arriving into our dimension aboard some sort of vessel or wearing any kind of contraption upon their bodies. This would mean it would need the ability to move back and forth between dimension through no artificial means. Some believe it to be animal, others somewhere higher up the evolutionary ladder but I don't think anyone believes it to be intellectually superior to ourselves.

If in fact bigfoot was inter-dimensional and it's appearance here was not based on any intellectual decision by itself, but a spontaneous occurence that just happens, don't you think we'd be seeing other animals, foliage, or even structures from that unknown dimension also appearing and being reported? Or are we to believe that bigfoot is the ONLY thing that exists in that other dimension so there's nothing else that can just pop over. What about food, water, solid ground to stand on? Easy enough we make another theory stating he only has mass when he's here but over there he just floats around endlessly in a vast ocean of nothingness and doesn't eat, drink or anything else. If that were the case no wonder he visits here, I would too!
tiger66
I see Bigfoot all the time... when I wear my tinfoil hat. thumbup.gif
RayG
QUOTE(moregon @ Oct 11 2007, 06:26 AM) *
Theories are guesses decorated with a fancy name, and not all theories are based on facts. Unless the theory is based on facts the words Theory, Opinion and Speculation can all be used interchangeably.


I always wince when I see the word theory, used in relation to bigfoot, in the manner you've just described. Just to be nit-picky (what, who, me?), but if we're using the word in a scientific manner it has a different meaning from the non-scientific usage.

From Wikipedia:

QUOTE
The word theory has a number of distinct meanings in different fields of knowledge, depending on their methodologies and the context of discussion.

In common usage, people often use the word theory to signify a conjecture, an opinion, or a speculation. In this usage, a theory is not necessarily based on facts; in other words, it is not required to be consistent with true descriptions of reality. True descriptions of reality are more reflectively understood as statements which would be true independently of what people think about them. In this usage, the word is synonymous with hypothesis. This common usage of theory leads to the common but misguided statement "It's not a fact, it's only a theory."

In science, a theory is a mathematical or logical explanation, or a testable model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition. For example, it is a fact that an apple dropped on earth has been observed to fall towards the center of the planet, and the theories commonly used to describe and explain this behaviour are Newton's theory of universal gravitation (see also gravitation), and general relativity.


From dictionary.com:
QUOTE
a theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity.

A hypothesis is a conjecture put forth as a possible explanation of phenomena or relations, which serves as a basis of argument or experimentation to reach the truth: This idea is only a hypothesis.


RayG
bf2004
The new DVD based on M.K. Davis' theories on the P/G Movie is out now, titled Spotlight on The Patterson/Gimlin Film: The M.K. Davis Theory. My review of it is here: http://southeastsasquatchassociation.blogs...rsongimlin.html
Dad
QUOTE(bf2004 @ Oct 11 2007, 01:57 PM) *
The new DVD based on M.K. Davis' theories on the P/G Movie is out now, titled Spotlight on The Patterson/Gimlin Film: The M.K. Davis Theory. My review of it is here: http://southeastsasquatchassociation.blogs...rsongimlin.html


Cool....mine should be in the mail, I pre-ordered it.....

3.5 out of 4.....not bad.....I've got worse stuff on the shelf wink.gif
rockinkt
QUOTE(RayG @ Oct 11 2007, 04:21 AM) *
I always wince when I see the word theory, used in relation to bigfoot, in the manner you've just described. Just to be nit-picky (what, who, me?), but if we're using the word in a scientific manner it has a different meaning from the non-scientific usage.

From Wikipedia:
From dictionary.com:

RayG


Nicely put, Ray! new_thumbsupsmileyanim.gif
Dad
Wow.......

Where do I begin.......

First.....in an email a few weeks back I told you (John... I figure you'll be reading this) that I felt you were a stand up guy after hearing an interview you did......and again I feel that way.....apparently one reason you held up the film was to put Robert W. Morgan's name where it belongs.....Robert went out on a limb years ago, hopefully he has seen the film and is sleeping good tonight........

Second....as unpopular as this may be (but that's fine, I'm not running for BFF Mayor) I feel we are lucky to have a guy like MK who has put his time and effort into the P&G film......I feel we have to remain open minded as to what this 'creature' may be.....because in my opinion we have little to prove MK's findings wrong..... call me what ya want...rally the dogs and attack if you wish......the truth is nobody knows what this creature is whether you want to admit it or not smile.gif......

I think this film belongs on every researchers shelf.....whether they want to admit they own it or not......whether they want to admit it made them think beyond the peer pressure they feel in the world of 'Bigfoot Research' or not.....

Thanks MK.....and thank you John for the time and effort you put into another top shelf documentary.......

Dennis
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.