sasquatchfound
Jul 22 2007, 09:27 PM
Taken off of Ghostchatter.com in january 2007 (R.E.P. Lures)
uffda320
Jul 22 2007, 09:41 PM
Umm..it says to click here to expand..that doesn't work.
tiger66
Jul 22 2007, 09:48 PM
Yup. What he said. Given the smaller picture, I could not make out any real detail, other than a blobsquatch.
Need the larger photo.
poignant
Jul 22 2007, 10:11 PM
Doubt we can glean anything useful or convincing from such a picture.
SquatchCommando
Jul 22 2007, 10:35 PM
Arms seem short, head seems way big for a Sas
spudsquatch
Jul 22 2007, 10:50 PM
So is this the photo that BFRO is in the process of copyrighting?
Joke right??
Please say yes!
RavenBC
Jul 22 2007, 11:20 PM
It looks like a toy or a cardboard cut-out.
Fake.
-Ray
Make(Me)Believe
Jul 23 2007, 12:14 AM
After enhancing the photo:

Congratulations. You've proven the link between Bigfoot and UFOs.
Lyndon
Jul 23 2007, 12:42 AM
QUOTE(SquatchCommando @ Jul 22 2007, 10:35 PM)

Arms seem short, head seems way big for a Sas
Yup, what he said. Head too big, arms too short....very much typical of guys in a hairy suits.
moregon
Jul 23 2007, 12:59 AM
Someone has doctored that picture, and most likely it was whomever posted it at the Ghostchatter. The original was posted by the owner of R.E.P. Lures at one of his sites, and was nowhere near that dark. Personally the original looked like a photo of a painting, and not of a live subject. However he's been here in the past, maybe he'll show up and give us his version of the origin of this photo.
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 07:06 AM
It's my understanding that Wally, the moneyman of the BFRO has this copyrighted.
Melissa
Jul 23 2007, 08:49 AM
Wally? Who is Wally? You mean someone is funding MM other than the paid expeditions?
As for the photo, if someone could make it a little darker - I would sure appreciate it, there is a pesky light at the top which is apparently worthless. Thanks.
Bobby Orangeboom
Jul 23 2007, 09:06 AM
It's a drawing...
Melissa
Jul 23 2007, 09:16 AM
Thats what it reminds me of too.. But I can hardly see anything but that light.
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 10:02 AM
QUOTE(Melissa @ Jul 23 2007, 09:49 AM)

Wally? Who is Wally? You mean someone is funding MM other than the paid expeditions?
As for the photo, if someone could make it a little darker - I would sure appreciate it, there is a pesky light at the top which is apparently worthless. Thanks.
Wally Hersom is a Las Vegas millionaire who is givng MM 10 grand a month for expenses. Didn't you folks know that?
Melissa
Jul 23 2007, 10:12 AM
I figured he was being funded by someone, just didnt have a name. You cant do what he does for free, someone had to be footing the bill.
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 10:23 AM
Wally is also buying all the thermal gear for them.
Melissa
Jul 23 2007, 10:56 AM
I wonder why Wally latched onto MM and not Biscardi..
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 11:30 AM
of the two, MM has the larger researcher base, several researchers were told to make copies of their casts for MM to give to Wally. Some of us who refused, got the boot.
Melissa
Jul 23 2007, 11:40 AM
Somethings (people) never change. Sorry you were treated so poorly. There are some very good people in that Organization - their reasons for staying are their own and I wont throw stones at them - but MM is something else.
You say Wally paid to have this photo copyrighted? Is he basically signing checks at will for MM above the 10 grand a month?
Humm, hope MM is paying his taxes accordingly. LOL.
youcan'tseeme
Jul 23 2007, 12:53 PM
All I can see is black with 2 white dots?
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 01:02 PM
On the BFRO website where these photos were posted, Wally Hershom's name is on the photos with a copyright next to it. He even paid another big chunk of money for the photos although the amount was never discussed.
moregon
Jul 23 2007, 01:29 PM
Is/was it the same photo seen here that's real dark or the lighter version?
bigswamp
Jul 23 2007, 02:02 PM
Stumpknocker, explain the casts.
Texas Bigfoot
Jul 23 2007, 02:09 PM
If Wally is buying the thermal equipment, he ain't buying enough. Every campout, yeah I said campout on purpose, seems to result in stories of campers, yeah I said campers, surrounded by large hominoids, who are plainly visible on thermal imagers, but aren't yet hooked up to the cameras that everyone has, but can't/won't use.
If I were Wally I'd change two things. I'd be there, because what's the fun of paying if you're not there, and I demand results. Campfire stories I can get anywhere for free.
yowiie
Jul 23 2007, 02:10 PM
QUOTE(Lyndon @ Jul 23 2007, 12:42 AM)

Yup, what he said. Head too big, arms too short....very much typical of guys in a hairy suits.
I'll have to agree, fake,fake fake.
Why do they bother with this stuff it gets bloody annoying
ddh1969
Jul 23 2007, 02:30 PM
QUOTE
If Wally is buying the thermal equipment, he ain't buying enough. Every campout, yeah I said campout on purpose, seems to result in stories of campers, yeah I said campers, surrounded by large hominoids, who are plainly visible on thermal imagers, but aren't yet hooked up to the cameras that everyone has, but can't/won't use.
I can't concur enough on this point. It seems to be a running theme through all 'serious' expeditions. It seems like Wally could pay someone to set up all kinds of cams in all kinds of hot spots and whatever else anyone thought they needed to actually get anything.
reminds me of something I always say...
'People are the reason things usually only look good on paper'. Ideas are one thing...getting people to execute them (properly) is something totally different.
Stumpknocker
Jul 23 2007, 04:17 PM
MM want researchers with casts of prints to make copies of them, so he could give them to Wally to show his family that he wasn't wasting his money on bullsh*t research. I had several casts of the eastern bigfoot, when I said no, nothing was said, just pulled the plug on me. These pictures here are lower quality than the ones on the BFRO website, but still look fake no matter how you look at it.
Seriously, no one here knew about this?
wvbig
Jul 23 2007, 05:32 PM
QUOTE(sasquatchfound @ Jul 22 2007, 11:27 PM)

Taken off of Ghostchatter.com in january 2007 (R.E.P. Lures)
By the way it is highlighted toward the middle on both sides, it looks metallic.
Jedi_Master
Jul 23 2007, 05:35 PM
Howdy folks...
I brightened it up some...

The first thing that popped into my mind was a scene or maybe a poster from the Legend Of Boggy Creek (it's been a while since I've seen it)...
But...anyway...that's my 2 pennies...
**Edti to add**
And what is circled was the house and roof line...
bigswamp
Jul 23 2007, 05:45 PM
Stumpknocker, remember to be mindful of how you came to those tracks.
Texas Bigfoot
Jul 23 2007, 05:47 PM
Red circle on picture appears. Game on!
Jedi_Master
Jul 23 2007, 05:57 PM
QUOTE(Texas Bigfoot @ Jul 23 2007, 05:47 PM)

Red circle on picture appears. Game on!
Yeah...
I guess it is...I just remember something like what is pictured coming from a movie or poster (and boggy creek was the first that popped into my head)...
Make(Me)Believe
Jul 23 2007, 08:36 PM
QUOTE(wvbig @ Jul 23 2007, 04:32 PM)

By the way it is highlighted toward the middle on both sides, it looks metallic.
Please refer to my first response for my enhancement. There's a reason it appears metallic!
youcan'tseeme
Jul 23 2007, 09:24 PM
Man those are horrible. It doesn't even look like a guy in a suit, more like some cardboard cut out.
uffda320
Jul 23 2007, 09:28 PM
QUOTE(Make(Me)Believe @ Jul 23 2007, 12:14 AM)

After enhancing the photo:

Congratulations. You've proven the link between Bigfoot and UFOs.
Best movie, ever! Klaatu barada nikto.
Lyndon
Jul 24 2007, 12:16 AM
QUOTE(yowiie @ Jul 23 2007, 02:10 PM)

Yeah, it's really getting tedious, especially with all these fake and/or wishful thinking videos on You Tube to go with it. The perils of the internet.
yowiie
Jul 24 2007, 03:48 AM
QUOTE(Lyndon @ Jul 24 2007, 12:16 AM)

Yeah, it's really getting tedious, especially with all these fake and/or wishful thinking videos on You Tube to go with it. The perils of the internet.
You guys in USA seem to have a lot more hoaxers that we do here in Oz, is there a monetary value on any evidence that comes forward that would encourage these idiots to try to pull the wool over our eyes.
cryptidon
Jul 24 2007, 08:58 AM
Looks like he's carrying a cooler full of cold ones.
Texas Bigfoot
Jul 24 2007, 10:52 AM
QUOTE(yowiie @ Jul 24 2007, 04:48 AM)

You guys in USA seem to have a lot more hoaxers that we do here in Oz, is there a monetary value on any evidence that comes forward that would encourage these idiots to try to pull the wool over our eyes.
No, unfortunately it's the "fame at any cost" mentality that is rampant in our country. We are in the "Bread and Circus'" phase that occurs a hundred years or so before the actual implosion. Soon, all of the third worlders who come here and complain will get their wish. It will be just like the place they left.
Stumpknocker
Jul 24 2007, 12:11 PM
No way will I ever forget that bigswamp .
robo
Jul 29 2007, 11:13 AM
The picture is so pixellated and has so much JPEG compression garbage that it's impossible to tell if was even a photo to start out with, or something someone did in MS Paint.
Anyway, one thing that's obvious is that the head and neck are entirely the wrong shape, so it's better than a blobsquatch in the sense that it's obviously not a Sasquatch, even if it was real.
Squonksquatch
Jul 30 2007, 12:10 PM
Looks to me like it should be the cover of a book for kids: "The Mystery of Monster Mountain/Lake/Hollow/Swamp/Whatever"
I have to say this is one of the lamest attempts to pass something off as good evidence that I've seen.
sasquatchfound
Jul 30 2007, 12:20 PM
Well all you have to do is ask D.B. Young it is the pic he took in his back yard on a game cam he put into a carcus. He even tried selling the pic on Ghostchatter.com before he gave it to the BFRO. Alot of people got it off ghostchatter.com before he removed it he went by the username R.E.P. Lures on there.
Nightstalker
Sep 15 2007, 07:55 PM
Arms are too short
twinkletoes
Sep 15 2007, 09:55 PM
I can't see what it is.. maybe I'm blind..
Scaper
Sep 15 2007, 11:37 PM
If you lighten up the image just a little bit you can see there is another figure standing beside Bigfoot.
hopeful
Sep 16 2007, 12:20 PM
Another image? Got any red circles? I can't see anything without red circles.
Scaper
Sep 16 2007, 03:25 PM
It's to the right side of the photo.
hopeful
Sep 17 2007, 01:06 PM
Thank you very much for the red circle, Scraper. At least I know I'm looking in the right place. But ... I can't really make anything out of it. I'm seeing it as a few thin trees maybe. I do see a lighter colored something, but ... I don't know.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.