Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Why is Bigfoot so sad?
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media > News & Magazine Articles
tugboatwa
http://www.dailypress.net/stories/articles...articleID=12186
QUOTE
Why is Bigfoot so sad?

FLINT — They heard Bigfoot in the Upper Peninsula last week. His cry was described in one news account as mournful.

My question: Why would Bigfoot be sad? He totally seems to have the life. He gets to roam the woods all day. Dines on sushi. No one makes him get a haircut. Doesn’t wear shoes.

Given all that, you’d think he’d skip through the woods making happy sounds along the lines of “Tra-la, tra-la” or maybe Whoohoo!”

Personally, I like to think that Bigfoot is not only happy, but scornful of those who pursue him, as in, “I don’t have to be in the office Monday morning. You do. Suckerrrs!”

Anyway, members of the Bigfoot Field Research Organization who tromped the woods near Marquette last week seemed satisfied. They cited his recorded cry as proof that Bigfoot exists and, more to the point, that they didn’t waste the $300 per it cost them to go on the excursion.

“I’m not a believer,” the group’s president Matt Moneymaker told UPI. “I’m a knower. You’d have to be in total denial to say that none exist.”

Guess I’m in total denial. I don’t think he exists. Ditto for the Abominable Snowman, the Loch Ness Monster or the Easter Bunny. (My jury’s still out on fairies, though. I mean, someone keeps picking my socks up off the floor and putting them in the hamper, and it sure ain’t me.)

That said, do I think people like Moneymaker are ripping off their customers, as a newspaper article asked last week?

Heck no! For 300 bucks his clients get a weekend in the woods playing with cool A/V equipment, expecting to hear magic in every snap of a twig, pretending that every indentation in the mud is a fantastical creature’s big toe. What’d YOU do last weekend? More to the point: When’s the next one? Sign me up.

I don’t care if it’s folly. I like folly. To be honest, I’ll bet many of his pursuers don’t truly think Bigfoot exists. But they believe he does. Some small part of them, anyway. That’s all that counts. There’s a big difference between thinking and believing, don’t forget.

For instance, looking at the news, I don’t think there’s more love in the world than hate. But I believe that it’s so. I hope that it’s so. Same with Bigfoot. No, I don’t think he and his size 28s roam the U.P. any more than I believe leprechauns hide my car keys.

But I fervently hope he does and they do. (Note to the leprechauns, just in case: I’ll get you someday, my pretties. And your little dogs, too!)

I also hope that if Bigfoot’s out there that they never catch him, nor find any conclusive proof of his existence or lack thereof.

I prefer the mystery.

There’s not nearly enough of it in life.
billgreen2005bigfoot
hey tugboatwa wow another great new article about the bfro. thanks bill smile.gif please keep me posted ok.
Lyndon
Another useless hack giving his tuppence worth. Easter bunny, faries and leprechauns in the same context? Oh please, this gets old real quick.
Robert
More of the same old crap. Why don't they try to write something different?

Because they're hacks, that's why.
Robert
Actually I don't think bigfoots are sad.

They are care-free, happy-go-lucky chaps who whistle a cheery tune, probably banging trees with a stick as they skip merrily along, having a grand old time!

Watch the New Hampshire video on Utube if you don't believe me.
RogerKni
I thought that article was one of the few scoffing pieces of journalism that wasn't bad. It had a light touch and was actually witty. And it I think was insightful about the motives of many of the participants, and about the benefits of Bigfooting as a justification for getting out of the house.
wudewasa
QUOTE(tugboatwa @ Jul 19 2007, 09:38 AM) *


"They cited his recorded cry as proof that Bigfoot exists and, more to the point, that they didn’t waste the $300 per it cost them to go on the excursion."

Perhaps the cry came from a straggler separated from a "Rainbow Gathering" in the perpetual lamentation of Jerry Garcia's drug dealt death. It would be easy to confuse a matted, hirsute human possessing poor hygiene habits with a small sasquatch.

“I’m not a believer,” the group’s president Matt Moneymaker told UPI. “I’m a knower. You’d have to be in total denial to say that none exist.”

Way to redefine yourself and spin the sentence with snob appeal!
jon a. larsen
Well, I see that Matt Moneymaker has made use of MY term....."knower".......Guess he knows a good term when he sees one........


Edited to add: June 5, 2004, 1:10 PM General Discussion #107212
Ty
Seems appropriate... blink.gif

Click to view attachment
Kucta-qa
Frickin' ignorant media.... man.
StoneyRocks
QUOTE(Robert @ Jul 19 2007, 11:09 AM) *
They are care-free, happy-go-lucky chaps who whistle a cheery tune, probably banging trees with a stick as they skip merrily along, having a grand old time!


You forgot the part of how much enjoyment BF's get out of jamming said stick into the overly tight arses of smart aleck, small town, journalistic hacks... coverlaugh.gif
Thigmo
QUOTE(RogerKni @ Jul 19 2007, 03:48 PM) *
I thought that article was one of the few scoffing pieces of journalism that wasn't bad. It had a light touch and was actually witty. And it I think was insightful about the motives of many of the participants, and about the benefits of Bigfooting as a justification for getting out of the house.


I agree. And the writer was at least a little self-deprecating about the fairies and leprechauns. But, let's face it: until a squatch gets hauled in, we're a bunch of nutcases to the rest of the world. I really don't have a problem with that. If/when one does get caught/killed/sufficiently-documented-for-science, then maybe we'll be heroes, or, more likely, people will just say, "Those people were on to something after all." But I ain't holding my breath for that moment.

@ Ty: FTW!!!!111!!1!!!!
JayleeD
QUOTE(RogerKni @ Jul 19 2007, 02:48 PM) *
I thought that article was one of the few scoffing pieces of journalism that wasn't bad. It had a light touch and was actually witty. And it I think was insightful about the motives of many of the participants, and about the benefits of Bigfooting as a justification for getting out of the house.


QUOTE(Thigmo)
I agree. And the writer was at least a little self-deprecating about the fairies and leprechauns. But, let's face it: until a squatch gets hauled in, we're a bunch of nutcases to the rest of the world. I really don't have a problem with that. If/when one does get caught/killed/sufficiently-documented-for-science, then maybe we'll be heroes, or, more likely, people will just say, "Those people were on to something after all." But I ain't holding my breath for that moment.


Totally agree with both of you. thumbup.gif

Jon, 'bout time, huh?


Ty, he is so precious!

blowkiss.gif


icon_really_happy_guy.gif
Ty
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jul 19 2007, 11:19 PM) *
Ty, he is so precious!

blowkiss.gif
icon_really_happy_guy.gif


kiss.gif


laugh.gif
Texas Bigfoot
I agree that most journalists never vary from the established template. In other words, they are hacks. However if the BFRO doesn't act like the pre-eminent Bigfoot research organization they claim to be, and get some real results, this is how they will be treated by the media. They bring this on themselves.
Apeman
I think Bigfoot himself explained why he was sad in this Newsweek Interview:

QUOTE
Inrerviewer: Your first book was an autobiography, now you're doing a memoir—which people often write in their twilight years. Are your days numbered?

Bigfoot: Bigfoot maybe start have greater sense of own mortality in last few years. Trying quit smoking. Couple years ago have to give up drink Pine Sol, it numb pain and comfort Bigfoot because smell remind Bigfoot of woods but also burn pine fresh hole through small intestine. So much blood.


QUOTE
Interviewer: In your heyday, you had wild parties with Morris the Cat, Andrew Dice Clay and Emilio Estevez. What happened to those guys?

Bigfoot: Don't know, I stop returning they calls a long time ago. They just get very pathetic and needy and sad, and Bigfoot no could handle being friend anymore. Think Morris dead now, which sad because he owe Bigfoot money.


Pretty straight forward if you ask me?

Apeman
bartlojays
QUOTE(jon a. larsen @ Jul 19 2007, 06:08 PM) *
Well, I see that Matt Moneymaker has made use of MY term....."knower".......Guess he knows a good term when he sees one........
Edited to add: June 5, 2004, 1:10 PM General Discussion #107212



Or he could have gotten from me, I say it pretty often and I've never heard of you or seen your post. Must be a coincidence?
Just want to make that clear so I save you the time of accusing me, if you see me use the term in posts on any forums.
Huntster
QUOTE
Why is Bigfoot so sad?...


Because the know-it-alls (science, government, environmentalists, media, et al) don't give a damn about them.
wudewasa
QUOTE(Huntster @ Jul 20 2007, 02:43 PM) *
Because the know-it-alls (science, government, environmentalists, media, et al) don't give a damn about them.


Sounds like you are a know-it-all regarding those people.

It must be nice at the top.
billgreen2005bigfoot
QUOTE(Ty @ Jul 20 2007, 12:56 AM) *
Seems appropriate... blink.gif

Click to view attachment

hey ty great above sasquatch artwork i think lol i guess. bill
Huntster
QUOTE(wudewasa @ Jul 20 2007, 07:45 PM) *
QUOTE
(Huntster @ Jul 20 2007, 02:43 PM) *
Because the know-it-alls (science, government, environmentalists, media, et al) don't give a damn about them.


Sounds like you are a know-it-all regarding those people.

It must be nice at the top.


Your sense of sound is faulty. I'm not a know-it-all. I'm a know-what-I-see.

And I don't see many in science, any in government, any in the environmental industry, and many in the mass media giving this subject due scrutiny.

Do you?
Lyndon
QUOTE(Thigmo @ Jul 19 2007, 08:29 PM) *
I agree. And the writer was at least a little self-deprecating about the fairies and leprechauns.


Yes but it's stupid to equate sasquatch to leprechauns and faries. That's what I was getting at. I don't see any mainstream t.v programmes or established scientific personalities devoting time to seriously looking into faries and leprechauns.

I don't think there is an equivalent to the likes of Jane Goodall or George Schaller keeping an open mind about fairies and leprechauns is there? And that's without bringing the likes of Kratnz, Meldrum, Bindernagel, Fahrenbach, Swindler into the equation.

QUOTE
But, let's face it: until a squatch gets hauled in, we're a bunch of nutcases to the rest of the world.


Disagree totally. I'm my social sphere, most people have an open mind. Most people I have spoken to on the subject do not relegate it into bullcrap. Some might think that that, some might think the opposite but the majority of those who I know say "hmmmmmm maybe"

Keep in mind, a great many of the world's people profess to having beliefs in things a lot stranger and more far fetched than an unknown primate avoiding scientific verification. Apart from belief in the Bible or the Koran, there are also millions of people who believe in UFOs, ghosts, the afterlife, clairvoyancy, ESP ect ect....all things which are a lot crazier than the idea of a flesh and blood uprite apelike animal hiding in the forests.

QUOTE
I really don't have a problem with that.


Oh I do. I'm not a nutjob. Neither are most of the people who post here.
Lyndon
Sheesh, I can't believe I spelled 'upright' as 'uprite'. How did that happen? Maybe I am whacked. scratchhead.gif

Psst, I wonder if the article writer would be so kind as to forward me a copy of "Leprechauns:Legend Meets Science". new_lmaosmiley.gif
Huntster
QUOTE(Lyndon @ Jul 21 2007, 01:35 AM) *
....I'm my social sphere, most people have an open mind. Most people I have spoken to on the subject do not relegate it into bullcrap. Some might think that that, some might think the opposite but the majority of those who I know say "hmmmmmm maybe"...


That isn't my experience. I seem to run into the full spectrum of attitudes.

And of the ones who tend to believe (not the open minded types, but the ones who openly believe), many others consider them stupid.

One of my hunting partners thinks sasquatchery is pure bullshit. But he gets real quiet when I tell him of the sasquatchery that he just doesn't know about because he doesn't look into it. What he's basing his opinion on is the fact that he hasn't seen evidence himself (despite being an outdoorsman), some of the silly TV shows out there (the BFRO expedition effect, if you will), and the fact that mankind hasn't recognized them yet (the "we would have found one by now" position).
GrandCherokee
QUOTE(RogerKni @ Jul 19 2007, 12:48 PM) *
I thought that article was one of the few scoffing pieces of journalism that wasn't bad. It had a light touch and was actually witty. And it I think was insightful about the motives of many of the participants, and about the benefits of Bigfooting as a justification for getting out of the house.



I totally agree Roger! Gave me a few chuckles for sure!

Given the writer's self-depreciation, it is a pity that some researchers don't, or can't, practice the same..it would make this a bit more fun, rather then a religion.
Un-pucker your asses and relax folks! The popping noises won't scare off squatch!
ddh1969
I'm a knower. I just don't know enough to know what I don't know about what I think I know. Ya know?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.