http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CQ4txNehzE

Where is Easterville? Can anyone translate Cree?

Two questions/comments:

1. Has the video been edited? Why does it cut off so suddenly? Did they walk up to it, etc.
2. Why is it in the bottom of the frame? It'd be nice to see it's legs,.

OK, that's more than 2.

Holy you-know-what! That is like crack! I liked that taste...can we hope for more? Any metadata or image enhancement from the techno gurus?

Link to info on First Nation's (Canadian) village:

http://www.norman-rha.mb.ca/Easterville.htm

Here's from the Wiki entry:
Easterville is an unincorporated community in the Canadian province of Manitoba. It is situated 200 kilometres southwest of The Pas, Manitoba and 100 kilometres west of Grand Rapids, Manitoba on the south shore of Cedar Lake.

The Chemawawin First Nations community is adjacent to Easterville on Cedar Lake.

Both the First Nations reserve and Easterville were re-located to the south shore of Cedar Lake in 1962-63 when Manitoba Hydro flooded their old locations on the lake.

The communities are located along PTH 68

Sure, the first one's free...

Click to view attachment

Well, if it's a suit, it's a nice one.

Wow. That is better than average. But I have to ask, if you had a great film of bigfoot, would you release it to youtube?

I don't know if you saw this, but the first 'comment' had a translation. Obviously I have no idea whether it's accurate, but here it is:

"These young men are speaking in cree..."There's someone standing here boy"...(another speaking)"it looks big"...."can you see it boy?"..."it's kinda far away"" by cooldude311



I agree. But it moves like a person, IMO. I realize it doesn't move much, but it almost looks like a guy taking a uh, a whiz. . .I'm not real sure what to think on this one. It'd be nice to have some more info.

There must be more to this video, I can't imagine it cutting off so quick exactly at 30 seconds. Kind of like those old quater peep-shows. Not that I have ever seen one of those.

Lol, probably not (put it on youtube) There might be a good reason why it ends abruptly. Then again, maybe his phone's battery went dead, or it ran out of room. I don't think a cell phone holds much video.

Certainly intriguing but doesn't it look like there is a BIG separation above the shoulder? Like a vest, or at least a seem? It's also awfully black.

Looks like a guy in a black coat, collar up and a black baseball hat, I think I can see the brim in a few frames. I don't see any fur

No, this is real. No cap on earlier frames. Lots of fur, it's shiny black like Patty.

The original is 450 frames, sitting here debating how to deliver it to the forum...

Yes. The person with the fastest T1 line will be the one who discovers bigfoot.

Watch the powerful right arm foraging. The head is ducked down a bit in the bushes...

Click to view attachment

Apeman: is this a real animal?

I followed you on the MDF enhancement, but, don't make come over there.
I hope you haven't done any enhancements on that clip yet.
When you do, I will take another look.

Actually I think most of us would consider Patty to be brown, not black.

At this stage I find it interesting but unconvincing. My first thought was gorilla- because of the shape, hidden legs and black color, but the Cree voiceover (is it possible to confirm it's from the original video and not superimposed?) and un-zoo-like surroundings make that unlikely. But I definitely see something very suspicious above the shoulder that makes me think human/costume/hoax/mistaken ID. There's also no midline definition in the back.

I'm still betting on hoax.

Apeman

If I didn't know better, I might. If you were a young person today who wanted to tell a whole lot of people something really quickly, you might.

Click to view attachment

More foraging...

Too bad we can't get a different download from the original digital capture. Utube downloads are always crappy resolution for the most part.

Click to view attachment

Look at the arm crashing UP through the foliage. See? In the upper right corner?

Gotcha. But don't be decieved by the funny video quality. Here are some bad frames, but these artifacts vanish after a few more frames run by... So the backpack, Drew's baseball hat, etc. aren't really there.

Click to view attachment

Click to view attachment

Click to view attachment

Here are some good ones...

Click to view attachment

Click to view attachment

This is worse than the usual youtube video, maybe this was a camera phone?

Edit: yes, from the youtube listing, this was a camera phone! That explains the funny angle and the video quality.

When I first saw this, I thought what was I suppose to be looking at, the black thing or something above it? Actually I thought that the black thing was a person whom the person with the phone was talking to. Just how close is the person standing? He speaks in a monotonous manner and 'bigfoot' seems 'none the wiser'.

That's what I thought.

Looks big looks Ape. If some legs were visable to see its entire height it could be a contender. Looks more real to me than the Freemen video.

Like someone on Cryptomundo said, at the start of the recording it looks like you can see pants in a frame very quickly and then again close to the end. Morgoth can you give us something on those frames?

The other problem I have with it is, why does he say at the end 'it's far away'. Obviously it's not (if that's actually a camera phone)plus it sounded staged. And why would he say that anyways? Maybe if they were looking through binoculars or something. Or it was obviously a good distance away. But it couldn't have been.

Do camera phones have zoom cababilty if it was truly 'far away'?

It really bugs me not to be able to see the legs. At first, it also looked like it had a hoody on.

I call it amazingly inconclusive.

Good work Morgoth! We need more!

Voila, le pants. This might be that same jpeg camera phone compression artifacts we saw earlier. They don't appear on every frame...

Click to view attachment

Stills...

Click to view attachment

Click to view attachment

Click to view attachment

It was me. Truth is I have no legs.

Looks like it could be a guy in a military parka, gloves, hood etc. I think I see the material rippling, on the back, as the subject moves, as expected in cotton duck, or even something synthetic. The odd framing does seem to indicate that the full body would reveal a 2x piece parka suit? A cleaned up, enhanced image could help. Worth a closer look.

hey everyone this new sasquatch filmfootage does look very interesting indeed but more research study etc needs to be done to it. people here should try to contact the people to ask them more nuteral nice questions filming the creature & any footprints or sasquatch evidence found in footage area. please keep me & everyone here updated ok.

I hope to be wrong, I really do. But as of right this moment, w/o further enhancement and such, it looks like a guy in a coat.

Do I see pants in the beginning?

Isn't the neck a little long, the speculated jaw too high (above the shoulder line)?

Is that not a hood?

Are those muscles moving beneath hair or wind-whipped coat material?

All the trees are moving in the wind. Is it possible to prove the subject is powerfully moving flora rather than wind?

Are there possible reasons for the erratic movement?

Maybe.



Nope, there is a chin and head, a hood would hide the neck.



Don't put too much stock in either one with these images, the heavy compression causes color-ramp-bands in arbitrary areas. See the study above with the backpack looking thing on the back -- it's not there a few frames later.



There is definitely some powerful branch crashing about. You can see the right hand jacking the branches up in front.



Wait a second, the movement looks pretty good. It's a bigfoot rooting around in the bushes. Even Apeman didn't call foul on the movement....

Many cell phones (like mine) can't take a video longer than 15-30 seconds. I think the fact that it's taken with a cell phone enhances it's credibility.



Yes, camera phones can zoom in, but it decreases in quality the more you zoom. Also, camera phones are annoyingly difficult to aim/center, especially when zooming.

Could this thing be sitting on a stump? That would explain the absence of legs in the picture and the impression of it wearing pants.

Can it be determined if this is zoomed or normal wide-angle? If it's zoom the stability is pretty good for being hand held, considering the subject matter. If it's at its normal setting, the guy taking the holding the cellphone seems to be pretty close to the subject, which is surprising all the more.
Thanks again Morgoth. We owe you.

Might also explain "pants"

Interesting footage. Looking forward to more info.


Redwolf

yup its a camera phone vid.......thank Morgoth ...for clearing it up ......and the vids on those phones are'nt long shame

The flash from waist level? down bugs me as well as the hard crease at the right rear shoulder? towards the end.
After looking at some google images for gorilla backsv this does however fit that body build.
One more thing, if they can get that close and talk that loud either its a hoax or we need to chip in and send these people a video camera because maybe grandpa Cree's got a tame one.

O.K. lets assume its real.
why break the limb? eating bark? less energy to pull leaves?
what kind of tree it that?
the left and right sway is to look for something else to break off?
defintely more sway than the Klamath video.
Looks blacker than Patty and Todd Standings video 2.
alrighty then back to the work-a-day world.

I thought there was something 'familiar' about it!

I think all this is, is probably a person in some type of long coat/outfit, that looks weird because it was taken with a cell phone at a funny angle. Nothing more than that. . .hell, it could be a gorilla at the zoo for all I know.

After watching the video over and over again on Youtube, I really believe its a person in a loose jacket (one of those jackets that has the loose flap over the front and back of the chest) with a hood. Towards the end of the footage it seems to me that I can see dark hair a different color from the jacket, as if the hood slipped off.

I also believe that the camera angle is purposefully hiding the bottom half of the object. The camera is angled steeply upwards - is that blue sky showing through at the top of the picture?

Also, the head just looks too small in proportion to the body to be an apelike creature. The way the figure is moving in and out of the foliage reminds me of someone setting a trap....

Sujen

Also, the guy who submitted this video is 42 years old (not exactly a kid), and hasn't logged back into YouTube in more than 10 hours. If I thought I had authentic BF footage, I'd be sitting on YouTube waiting for lots of reponses getting ready for my press tour. Of course, if I had BF footage, I'd go to a news organization instead of YouTube.

its very hard to judge based on the the video, but something that strikes me as pretty amazing is the way it breaks the branch. almost like a wrap and snap motion really quick with its right hand. Not quite sure what makes up their diet, but i know other animals in the wild eat the bark off trees, but not sure why.

I see creases from what appears to be a sweater on the right shoulder of the subject.

I believe you're right, dear Watson, lol. You have to be, you agreed with me!



Yeah that's the thing, the litmus test in my book. If it was footage that the guy honestly felt was of an unexplained creature, he'd be doing everything he could to get publicity. And I don't mean that in a bad way, just that if I had that type of evidence, I'd be on the rooftop shouting about it.

Yes, me too. And more than once. At first it looked vaguely gorilla-ish (not sasquatchian), but on repeat viewing it appears to be nothing more than a black hoodie. Creases in the material happen regularly throughout. I'm casting my vote for goof.

The thing that kills it for me is the volume they are talking....if i'm not mistaken, those phone cameras don't have that much zoom on them, so the men had to be fairly close to the film subject ---IMO. if the subject was a BF, he must have been a deaf one to not have heard the men talking..

Well that settles it. The Colonel agrees with me.

Sujen

How bout a Black Bear Parka with somekind of Light colored piping around hood, cause if you look at a couple of frames and freeze them, they look just like someone in a parka with the Hood up.