salutations all. i have been researching for about 17 yrs now and only made a startling discovery about our friend. i thnik there is at least two species of sasquatch roaming this land. if you look at the glowing of the eyes and the shape of the heads, you will see that the numbers are too great to be simple mutations. i belive that either sasquatch has split into two subspecies or that another hominid named bosei, descendant off of lucy. they have the means and the looks of sas, but i still need info from smithsonian. if you want to help research this any info given will be appreciated.

glowing eyes? funny shaped head?

uncle FRED? what yer runnin round out in th cornfield nekkid again for?

uhm, seriously, how can ya say its bosoi or whatever? shoot fire, aint nobody knows what th big tall upright one is, much less th smaller semi quadrapedal one.

but , yeah, im beginnin lately to think is more than one type of critter runnin round out there in th boonies.

N. americanus giganticus versus N americanus notquiteasbiggius.

bigfoot and littlerfoot.

muttfoot and jefffoot

big blue pills and little yellow pills

rb and robustes

wait, does that last one work really?

Ifn youse seen us out in de woods, haf neekid, youd say Yuppers

Actually, Rave (welcome, btw) i tend to think your right on part of it. I think there is more than one species .. er. type .. of sassi out there.
But i'd rather lump em all in one group for now, at least until we prove the darned things are out there.

welcome Rave....ummmm.. what infro from the 'smitty' are you waiting on ?

More than one species ?!?!

Well, thats just great , now I have to try to hunt down more than type of creature.

It never ends

I don't know about more than one species but you have to consider the differences between male and female, adult and juvenile first. A lot can change just between these genders and age brackets to think you are looking at two, possibly three distinct species.

What they are is a mute point right now. We know even less about early hominid behavior than where to find water on Mars. Granted, everyone needs to start from somewhere and it is usually with their interests at heart, but this can only be answered by bringing in one or with repeatable observational techniques.

if you look at the primates there really isnt that much difference between thesexs and age groups, especially with a thr great apes. they either have rounded or conical heads. as for ie. lowland gorillas have basically the same features, except the males are much larger, tend to me more muscular and grow a silver patch on thier backs, other than that nothing is different, look at humans. we are the same except woman have the jiggles and are completely insane.
but seriously if you all go and start going through the reports and look for yourself you will find out that i make sence, or im insane and im taking you all with me. muhahhhahahaha.

well i wanted to get the skeletal history of the chimp, gorillas, humans, and oranges, but they havent sent it to me yet. maybe they have fallen intothe fathomless abyss we know as Smithoinian Zone.

Ummmm, have you checked-out the beer thread lately?

Oh BEER !! I thought you said bear!
Yep. time to snore. Regarding that thread, I would WARN anyone thinking of going there. Its been shall we say, revitalized

Smartie-pants!

NOW what did I do ?? :rolleyes: Jus trying to be helpful Misfit

Getting this back on topic, I am curious to know if ANYONE has anything legit on three toed prints. LA, ARK, TX, wherever.
I know about Smokey's. Was there anything after that ?
Are three prints still coming out of that area? Last I heard Chilcutt did NOT have anything verified along those lines. Please correct me if I am wrong. That leads you to really wonder. Me anyways.
I can see four toed prints with a toe that doesn't strike for some reason. Or simply there are four toes. Ain't heard anything on the threes though.
Regarding other situations that might lead us to believe we have different species, I would just throw it back toward the variation in people. Incredibly varied. Couldn't these be too ?
Sure they could. So with the controversies regarding the separation of subspp and species seems to me we wait.

Well. I've heard from a researcher I trust that there are four varieties of BF in the South alone....plus some Napes of the baboon-like type, from another. I don't know what to think, as even one Bigfoot seems more than enough to have to find. I know that Chester Moore, Jr., in his book "Bigfoot South", describes three- and four-toed prints. He feels the different numbers of toes are due to isolated populations with inbreeding, like that tribe in Africa with the weird feet. I don't know, like I said, what to think, but that's my 2 cents in terms of what I've read about. :rolleyes:

The author who long ago proposed that there are many species of BF in the US & abroad is Mark A. Hall. His theories are a little extreme--they include a belief in what he calls "true giants"--entities 15 to 25 feet tall, for which there are up to a dozen sighting reports. This unfortuantely makes the whole BF field less credible to outsiders, so his view hasn't been popular among buffs. I like his books because of his effective treatment of scoftics: judicious, icy, and deadly. Unfortunately, trying to cope with all the types of BF he proposes is mind-warping.

He has a website where he sells his 2 books & a sub. to his crytozoological magazine, Wonders.
http://home.att.net/~mark.hall.wonders/

Two species, more than two?
Nope, can't go there. Can't accept the premise.
One is enough. Let's prove that one exists. It will be enough for one lifetime.

Not sure if you've read that book or not jan.. Its something like 9 propsed subspecies.... :rolleyes:

Would be interesting to see the baseline information that Hall stems his work from. Meat or just whipped potatos ?
I dont have a problem with speciation but I do wonder where the extremes are and where the fantasy begins.

I know it's been a long time with this thread dead, but I want to ask: Wouldn't it be physiologically impossible for a Bigfoot (or human, for that matter) to be 25 feet tall? The stress on the muscles and joints, the CV system.....I once read somewhere that a mouse could never never get as big as a elephant and still look like a mouse for that very reason. It a mouse got as big as an elephant, it would look like an elephant, minus the trunk, for physiologically necessary reasons. I have no idea what a Bigfoot 25 feet tall would look like, but I kind of doubt it would look like a Bigfoot.

tell you the truth, i would hate to bump into a 25' tall sas. it might think your a snack

it might think you are a snack, and be hungry knowing my luck!