Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: LA Times looks at Meldrum...
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media > News & Magazine Articles
tugboatwa
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/na...-home-headlines
QUOTE
Professor puts his stamp on the legend of Bigfoot
His book on the science of Sasquatch, the fruit of a lifelong fascination, troubles his Idaho State University colleagues.


By Sam Howe Verhovek, Times Staff Writer - December 10, 2006

POCATELLO, IDAHO — At a glance, professor D. Jeffrey Meldrum would seem to be a star on the Idaho State University campus here.

A popular instructor, Meldrum has written or edited five books, written dozens of articles in academic journals, and ranged across the American West and Canada for his field research. Famed primatologist Jane Goodall wrote a blurb for his latest book, which she said "brings a much-needed level of scientific analysis" to a raging debate.

The problem is the debate: Is Bigfoot real?

Meldrum, a tenured associate professor of anatomy, is in pursuit of the legendary ape-man also known as Sasquatch.

Some of his colleagues are not amused. They liken Meldrum's research to a hunt for Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny, and 20 of them signed a letter earlier this year expressing worry that Idaho State "may be perceived as a university that endorses fringe science over fundamental scientific perspectives that have withstood critical inquiry."

Or, as Douglas P. Wells, a physics professor here, puts it: "One could do deep-ocean research for SpongeBob SquarePants. That doesn't make it science."

An affable father of six sons, with a mop of brown hair and a bushy gray mustache, the 48-year-old Meldrum declines to say whether he believes Sasquatch exists. But he adds that based on the evidence he has gathered over the last decade, he thinks the likely answer is yes.

"I believe it would be more incredible to dismiss all the assertions about Bigfoot as a series of hoaxes and ruses," he says with academic precision, "than it would be to at least entertain the possibility that an unrecognized large primate exists in North America."

Even as they defend the concept of academic freedom, some who teach here worry that Meldrum's new book, "Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science," is "pseudoscience," in the words of Steven Lawyer, a clinical psychology professor.

"It's the kind of thing that will make Idaho State the butt of jokes," Martin Hackworth, a senior lecturer in the physics department, says of the book, born out of a 2003 program on the Discovery Channel and published by an offshoot of a science-fiction house.

The controversy over Meldrum's work is testimony to the enduring fascination with Sasquatch, as the Salish Indians called the ape-man; or Bigfoot, the term the Humboldt Times in Eureka, Calif., coined in an August 1958 article about a local logging crew's purported discovery of giant footprints.

But although there have been plenty of books on the subject over the years, Meldrum's is one of the very few that could put its author in the middle of an academic fracas.

Twice passed over for elevation from associate to full professor, Meldrum says he would proudly present his Sasquatch research as part of future consideration. As the book's overleaf puts it, he is "willing to stake his reputation on an objective look at the facts." (None of his other books deals with Sasquatch, and he covers the topic in just one lecture of a survey class he teaches, on living and fossil primates.)

Pervasive lore

Skeptics say it is absurd to think that a huge ape roams the American wilderness.

No carcass has ever turned up, and many footprint "discoveries" over the years have been correctly dismissed as hoaxes, Meldrum concedes in his book.

Ray Wallace, a force behind the 1958 footprint discovery and a source of Bigfoot photographs over the years, famously confessed on his deathbed four years ago that the hulking creature once captured on film was really his wife dressed in a gorilla suit.

On the other hand, no one has ever proved that Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Into this void comes the 297-page book, published by Forge. It's an entertaining compendium of Bigfootology.

A chart compares estimated physical dimensions of one purported Sasquatch with Arnold Schwarzenegger "at the peak of his bodybuilding career." The California governor comes off as a pipsqueak next to the 7-foot-4, 700-pound creature. Sasquatch's 68-inch waist is twice the size listed for Schwarzenegger, and he — or she — takes thigh size going away, 46" to 28.5".

Meldrum's small office here is crammed with plaster casts of strange footprints and handprints, even a buttocks print, that he has collected in the wilds and that he firmly says do not belong to any known mammal.

The professor says he has heard the strange wailings that some attribute to Bigfoot, and once he was in a cabin in Ontario when a big rock got thrown against an outside wall.

Bigfoot, he presumes.

Academic status

It is unclear how his new book will affect Meldrum's review when he comes up again for full professor, perhaps in a year or two.

"Jeff is a great teacher, and he does real good things for his department," says John Kijinski, dean of arts and sciences at Idaho State. "He runs the cadaver lab, and it's excellent."

Kijinski says he has not read the Bigfoot book and cannot comment on how it would fit into Meldrum's job review, although he suggests that work in a "non-peer-reviewed press" would probably count less than that in a university press or other academic forum.

"Venue where publication occurs is extremely important," he says. "As is the case with all the scientists here, our basic standard is peer review."

Meldrum's agent for the book, Michael Hsu, president of Minneapolis-based BooBam Ventures Inc., says it involves "too edgy a topic" for academic presses and is intended for a "general audience."

Meldrum says most of his research has been financed with private donations — about $80,000 so far, the bulk of it from a Texas oilman who believes he may have encountered Bigfoot on a hunting trip to East Texas.

The professor's supporters point out that his Bigfoot work doesn't interfere with what he does all day, which is teach human anatomy.

"I had heard he was way into Sasquatch, but he hasn't even mentioned it in our course," says Heather Lien, a 29-year-old graduate student in physical therapy, pausing in her laboratory dissection of the cadaver of a woman in her 70s. "I gather it's just a sideline interest of his. I think it's fascinating."

"Unless I ask, he doesn't even bring it up," says Steven Johnson, 25, another graduate student involved in the dissection.

The Idaho Museum of Natural History, on the campus, has a popular "Bigfoot: How Do We Know?" exhibit, which details the scientific quest for the great hairy man and discusses the roles of knowledge, belief, faith and folklore in keeping the Bigfoot story alive.

"Faith is believing what you know ain't so," says a quote from Mark Twain in the display.

Since boyhood

Meldrum's interest in the topic dates to an itinerant childhood in the prime Bigfoot-sighting terrain of Utah, Oregon, Idaho and eastern Washington, where his father was a produce merchandiser with the Albertson's supermarket chain.

"I spent a lot of time in the woods," Meldrum recalls. He was fascinated by animals of all kinds.

When he was 13, his parents gave him a book called "Abominable Snowmen: Legend Come to Life," which he keeps in his office. His interest in the creature — and in the mystery and romance of the search for it — grew so profound that one friend wrote in his 1976 Idaho high school yearbook: "Good luck hunting for Bigfoot."

Meldrum received bachelor's and master's degrees in zoology from Brigham Young University, and a doctorate in anatomical sciences from the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

His specialty is the evolutionary adaptation of bipedalism, or walking on two legs. (One of the books he edited is called "From Biped to Strider: The Emergence of Human Walking, Running and Resource Transport.") Over the years, Meldrum says, he and others have come across large prints that cannot be attributed to known animals.

"The subject begs for investigation," he says, rummaging through the large metal file drawers where he keeps the plaster footprint casts.

Meldrum says many of the prints would be extremely difficult to forge. The "flat flexible feet" — up to about a size 28, quintuple-E-wide shoe — are less rigid and arched than a human foot.

"All in all," he argues in the book, "this would be an efficient strategy for a giant terrestrial bipedal ape."

sam.howe.verhovek @latimes.com
LAL
Well, at least it says he's popular.

Not a bad article up to here:

"Ray Wallace, a force behind the 1958 footprint discovery and a source of Bigfoot photographs over the years, famously confessed on his deathbed four years ago that the hulking creature once captured on film was really his wife dressed in a gorilla suit."

:icon_bang: :icon_bang: :icon_bang: :icon_bang: :icon_bang: :icon_bang:
peregrine
QUOTE
Ray Wallace, a force behind the 1958 footprint discovery and a source of Bigfoot photographs over the years, famously confessed on his deathbed four years ago that the hulking creature once captured on film was really his wife dressed in a gorilla suit.
<sigh>

I wonder where the author dug up that delightful bit of misinformation?

Whatever happened to journalistic integrity within the Fourth Estate? Is there no passion for accuracy, or should we conclude that the media exist to sway public opinion?

Frustrating.


Edit to add that I didn't see that LAL was posting on the same issue when I started to write my comment.
LAL
They should print a retraction. Letters to the editor, anyone?
Flashman
I dunno what the physics department have got against him in particular, but they could use some reminders about how "out there" the cutting edge of physics is at times.

A couple of centuries ago we had Galvani "reanimating the dead" with his twitching frogs legs, more recently for instance, the famous Michelson-Morley experiment was looking for the luminiferous aether. The mythical medium that light propogated in. Then after the speed of light was "proved" as a universal constant (And that looks a bit shaky these days) there has been research into teleporting information by determining quantum spin states in separated pairs of electrons. Anyhoo, the point being is that physics would be going nowhere if it wasn't continuously breaking it's own rules. If we limited physics to only that which has been previously proven possible, then it would be going nowhere after 5 years (Probably 5 years worth of odds and ends to clear up to keep it going) I can only assume that Mr Wells is purely a teaching professor and not a research professor, he probably deals with the stuff that was written in stone 20 years ago, and doesn't have any truck with this probing the unknown rubbish.

Arthur C. Clarke's laws have a particular poignancy...

1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Obviously someone at Idaho State has a problem, and they're continually soliciting press comment on Dr M. I'm tempted to go on the offensive, fillet out every paper that ever came out of the physics department, determine which have been proven wrong, or superseded by newer research, (Maybe 1000s of papers in total and probably at least 10% or so that don't make the cut these days) and then get some hack to lambast the physics department for wasting public money on erroneous research, when we give him only the bad papers and rely on his lack of industry not to realise it's a small percentage of the total. After all, anything over 20 probably seems like a big number to the general populace.

If Mr Wells does do any research, it would be fun to go along when he delivers a paper and shout "rubbish" all the time, and when asked why say "Well this isn't my field but I feel qualified to deliver arbitrary opinions on it"

Anyway, it's offensive how plainly obvious it is that these attacks are due to Dr. M's mere participation in this field of enquiry. I see no real qualification of doubts about the quality of his participation or of his method. It takes the purest form of ignorance or the highest form of arrogance to assert that a field is unworthy for study, based on ones preconceptions or lack of knowledge about what that field encompasses.

Flash
Volsquatch
Dr. Meldrum is an easy target because of his well-known interest into a subject that is widely-considered by the general public(I.e. Joe Smith and all his buddies down at the corner service station) to be on the same par with fairies, elves, unicorns and goblins. If someone has jealousy toward Dr. Meldrum or has any kind of beef at all with his presence at University, then the easiest way to publicly embarrass him would be to point-out his level of interest in the bigfoot phenomenon.

It's very easy to use the beliefs of a majority as a tool to gain the upper-hand on a minority.
Smitty
"Ray Wallace, a force behind the 1958 footprint discovery and a source of Bigfoot photographs over the years, famously confessed CLAIMED on his deathbed four years ago that the hulking creature once captured on film was really his wife dressed in a gorilla suit."

There, fixed it for them.


That paragraph, if changed in that way, would have made this an almost acceptable article.

Oh, and I LOVE the way Flashman thinks. I think he has a very good idea, and I think he is right.

Smitty

P.S.: Jeff Meldrum, if you happen to read this, thanks for taking a beating for us. It cannot be easy to be the 'voice in the wilderness' on this issue. :new_thumbsupsmileyanim:
FredSneakers/David
Poor Meldrum, how I admire the man.

On a positive note, publicity is publicity, and alot of curious individuals would buy his book if they knew it existed. Nonetheless, its sad that he's getting such a unjustified and bad reputation mad.gif.
LAL
Ironically, Dr. Meldrum included the whole story of the Wallace family fiasco in his book, including the ultimate absurdity of the press putting Elna Wallace in the PGF.

The reporter should have read the book.
tugboatwa
I see the Chicago Tribune has picked up this story.
LAL
Do you think Dr. Meldrum wil get equal time?

How go the book sales?
Saskeptic
If a "popular" book counts less than peer-reviewed publications in an academic promotion decision, that's fine. But it shouldn't count against the author - unless it's something that kept the author from producing other peer-reviewed work. Bottom line, the pursuit of bigfoot by an academic should not be a black mark on that professor's record. The black mark should be lack of productivity. Jeff Meldrum seems to have the support of his dean, so the Physics Department can whine all they want, but if Meldrum has otherwise performed admirably then he'll make full professor. More power to him.

ps: SIX sons? Holy crap!
LAL
Yeah. I don't know how he finds the time.

"Teaching

BIOS 474/574 Human Anatomy (OT/PT emphasis)
BIOS 470/570 Sectional Anatomy
BIOS 417 Organic Evolution
BIOS 492 Senior Seminar

ANTH 433 Survey of Living Primates

ANTH 435 Survey of Fossil Primates

Publications

Journals:

2006 MacPhee RDE and DJ Meldrum. Postcranial remains of extinct Antillean monkeys (Platyrrhini, Callicebinae, Xenotrichini). American Museum Novitates 3516, 65 pp.

2004 Meldrum, DJ. Midfoot flexibility, fossil footprints, and Sasquatch steps: New perspectives on the evolution of bipedalism. J. Scientific Exploration 18:67-79.

2003 Meldrum, DJ and Stephens, TD. Who are the Children of Lehi? Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12:38-51.

1998 Kay, RF, Johnson, D and Meldrum, DJ. A new pitheciin primate from the middle Miocene of Argentina. Am. J. Primatol. 45:317-336.

1997 Meldrum, DJ, Dagosto, MD and White, J. Hindlimb suspension and hindfoot reversal in Varecia variegata and other arboreal mammals. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103:85-102.

1997 Meldrum, DJ and Kay, RF. A new genus of pitheciine primate from the Miocene of Colombia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 102:407-427.

Edited Volumes:

2004 Meldrum, DJ. Fossilized Hawaiian footprints compared to Laetoli hominid footprints. In DJ Meldrum and CE Hilton (eds.), From Biped to Strider: The Emergence of Modern Human Walking, Running, and Resource Transport. pp. 63-84 , New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishing.

2004 Hilton, CE and Meldrum, DJ, Walkers, Runners, Transporters. In DJ Meldrum and CE Hilton (eds.), From Biped to Strider: The Emergence of Modern Human Walking, Running, and Resource Transport. pp. 1-8, New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishing.

2004 Meldrum, DJ and Hilton, CE (eds.), From Biped to Strider: The Emergence of Modern Human Walking, Running, and Resource Transport. New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishing.

2002 Hartwig, WC and Meldrum, DJ. Miocene platyrrhines of the northern Neotropics. In WC Hartwig (ed.) The Primate Fossil Record. pp. 175-188, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2002 Meldrum, DJ and Jenecke, S. An Eocene titanothere from the Pahsimeroi Valley, Idaho. In: Akersten, WA, Thompson, ME, Meldrum, DJ and Rapp, RA, and McDonald, HG (eds.). And Whereas—Papers on the Vertebrate Paleontology of Idaho Honoring John A. White, Volume 2. Idaho Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers 37, pp. 18-22.

2002 Akersten, WA, Thompson, ME, Meldrum, DJ and Rapp, RA, and McDonald, HG (eds.). And Whereas—Papers on the Vertebrate Paleontology of Idaho Honoring John A. White, Volume 2. Idaho Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers 37, 192 pp.

1998 Akersten, WA, McDonald, HG, Meldrum, DJ and Flint, MET (eds.) And Whereas—Papers on the Vertebrate Paleontology of Idaho, Volume 1. Idaho Museum of Natural History Occasional Paper 36, 216 pp.

1998 Meldrum, DJ. Tail-assisted hindlimb suspension as a transitional behavior in the evolution of prehensile tails, in E Strasser, JG Fleagle, and HM McHenry, (eds.): Advances in Primatology: Primate Locomotion. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, pp. 145- 156.

1997 Kay, RF and Meldrum, DJ. A new small platyrrhine from the Miocene of Colombia and the phyletic position of the callitrichines. In RF Kay, RH Madden, RL Cifelli, and J Flynn (eds.): A History of Neotropical Fauna: Vertebrate Paleontology of the Miocene of Tropical South America. Washington, D.C.:Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 435-458.

1997 Meldrum, DJ and Kay, RF. Primate postcranial fossils from the Miocene of Colombia. In RF Kay, RH Madden, RL Cifelli, and J Flynn (eds.): A History of Neotropical Fauna: Vertebrate Paleontology of the Miocene of Tropical South America. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 459-472.

Monographs:

2006 Meldrum, J. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. New York: Forge Books.

2001 Stephens, TD, and Meldrum, DJ, with Petersen, FB. Evolution and Mormonism: A Quest for Understanding, Salt Lake City, Signature Press."

http://www.isu.edu/bios/Professors_Staff/meldrum_j.shtml


He was asked to do the companion book to LMS.
Saskeptic
Well, actually that isn't great productivity. I teach more than that on a 50% teaching appointment. But the peer-reviewed publication rate is kind of eye-opening, and I can see now why some of those physics guys might be grumbling. Tenured professors should be cranking out 3-4 peer-reviewed journal articles annually, and 5-6 is more typical for people operating at a high level. From what I see here, there's really just one respectable pub since 1998, and I mean "respectable" in the sense that faculty in other departments would consider the publication a "good" one. Our promotion and tenure committee would calculate this publication rate somewhere below 0.20 papers/year. That wouldn't cut it for tenure here, and it would certainly raise eyebrows if an already tenured professor was publishing so little. That is, of course, assuming that he's not on a 100% teaching appointment . . .
tugboatwa
And on Christmas Day, the story is picked up by the Fort Wayne JOURNALl GAZETTE.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.