Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Researcher produces new evidence of Bigfoot's existence
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media > News & Magazine Articles
tugboatwa
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/nst/Fri...cle/local1_html
QUOTE
Researcher produces new evidence of Bigfoot's existence

17 Nov 2006

KLUANG: A Bigfoot researcher came forward yesterday with what he claimed was new evidence of the creature’s existence in the deep jungles of Ulu Sedili in Kota Tinggi.

Mansur Poh gave several unpublished photographs to the New Straits Times, claiming they showed the footprints of the creature.

He said the photographs were snapped by some nature lovers early this year.

"The pictures of the footprints were taken in Ulu Sedili in Kota Tinggi and Kahang in Kluang this year."

Mansur is currently holding an exhibition on Bigfoot at the Dewan Che Luan Khor here in conjunction with the 5th Kluang Commerce and Industry Fair which will end this Sunday.

He is also a researcher of the Lesser Adjutants at the birds’ habitat in the coastal areas stretching from Muar to Batu Pahat.

Mansur said a preliminary report on his research on Bigfoot had been submitted to Menteri Besar Datuk Abdul Ghani Othman last month.

The report is titled "The Identity and Distribution of Bigfoot in Johor".

The research project is supervised by Associate Professor Dr Azhar Kassim who is with Universiti Putra Malaysia’s Department of Animal Science.

In his report, Mansur said he had interviewed 10 people from Segamat, Mersing, Kota Tinggi and Kluang who claimed they had seen Bigfoot or its footprints in the jungle.

One of those interviewed claimed that he saw four huge footprints, measuring 46cm by 28cm, last June.

The footprints, which he said were found at the Ulu Sedili Forest Reserve, were about two metres apart while the depth of each footprint was nearly 8cm.

Dr Azhar, meanwhile, said he is guiding Mansur in his research to ensure that it is being carried out in a scientific manner.

The local media highlighted the possible existence of Bigfoot early this year following the discovery of footprints in Kota Tinggi last December.
HarryHenderson
:icon_really_happy_guy: :icon_really_happy_guy: And that's the baby one.
moregon
tugboatwa beats me again...

Edges look too clean I think, and certainly don't look anything like the last one claimed from that part of the world. 18.11 inches long by 11.02 inches wide.
Blackbear
Wished they would have showed more photos..hard to tell from that one...the big toe looks shorter than the rest...Mr. Mansur Poh seems to be an ex Police officer...
OklahomaSquatch
CLEARLY a fake.
colstonewall1
QUOTE(OklahomaSquatch @ Nov 18 2006, 07:44 AM) *
CLEARLY a fake.



DITTO
WmRoy
QUOTE(colstonewall1 @ Nov 18 2006, 08:23 AM) *
QUOTE(OklahomaSquatch @ Nov 18 2006, 07:44 AM) *

CLEARLY a fake.



DITTO


AGREED......... yuk.gif
Saskeptic
So in other parts of the world where people claim to see bigfoot there are people hoaxing bigfoot evidence, but still no authentic evidence that the real live creatures exist at all?

Got it.
OklahomaSquatch
QUOTE(Saskeptic @ Nov 20 2006, 09:52 AM) *
So in other parts of the world where people claim to see bigfoot there are people hoaxing bigfoot evidence, but still no authentic evidence that the real live creatures exist at all?

Got it.


Yeah, and you should definitley base that complete line of thinking off of this one isolated incident.
scotto
Well that print pic looks a whole lot better than that Johor cast thing they were trying to unload on ebay for a pile of $$$$.

IMO, that whole flop over there holds no water period, with all the hoaxing going on. It got them publicity though, I had never even heard of Johor before the whole bf thang. :new_tiredsmiley:
PinelandsResearcher
Is that a bigfoot print or a big foot print?
bobbidooner
Doesn't make me think footprint at all, it reminds me of something a kid would draw. But I'm feeling grumpy and less than charitable today smile.gif

Obviously hard to make any kind of determination based on a single photo, but my initial reaction is that the cracks in the clay/dirt/soil would have been compromised/compressed in some fashion under the weight of whatever owns feet that big.
Flashman
QUOTE(bobbidooner @ Nov 22 2006, 01:49 PM) *
Obviously hard to make any kind of determination based on a single photo, but my initial reaction is that the cracks in the clay/dirt/soil would have been compromised/compressed in some fashion under the weight of whatever owns feet that big.


Well, I'd presume that ground that was cracked was all dried up and hard and therefore not soft enough to take a print, therefore it would seem most likely it dried and cracked after the print.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.