Sas is not evolved into a "human" but a shy Sas.

here is the senerio I would use, so bare with me please. 10 000 years agothere was bold Sas there was not so bold Sas and there was the Sas so shy he had a hard time getting dates. Bold Sas just walks up to Homo Sapian and bashes him over head and bang he has the food of the homo Sapian.


Well Homo Sapian doesn't have a 35 inch bicept like a Sas but he has real big noodles in his head and figures with spears arrows and a few freinds he can Make Bold Sas into an ex Sas so when Bold Sas trys it again he may take out a homo Sapian in the group but generally Bold Sas's start becomoing rare. and not passing on the bold gene. Now Homo Sapians like killing the Sas. One, it elemnates the guy taking his Carabu and Salmon and also makes him look studly to that chick in the white deer skin. So he goes out to kill more Sas's. with his buds. Well bold Sas's are gone so the find some not so bold Sas's hang out eating Samon in the Day. Soon the not so bold Sas gene is not being passed along but the homo sapian hunter and the chick in the white deerskins' are.

So what's left. the Homo Sapian and the few Sas so shy he almost can't get a date. Well now that Bold and not so bold are not around picking up lady Sas's guess what, Sas's so shy is getting more dates, and passing his genes on and his desendants are now being disscussed on the BFF and Blog Radio shows and scaring the hell out of campers, teens in lover lanes, and Marines in the woods at night.


Basicaly Sas has evolved to be elusive, 'cause non elusive Sas became rugs in Mr Homo Sapians cave. Not because they are real smart but because shy was the gene that got passed

It could very well be a bear or a surviving Amphiryonidae(bear-dog),that lived some 10000 plus years
ago. Also, it would not be a subspecies of PRIMATE. It would belong to the Order of Carnivora,suborder
Caniformia(dog like). Let me pause here, I think we're discussing Type B. Type A is definately Primate.
"A" possesses all the standard characteristics of a primate;could be a surviving member of the "great
ape" known as Gigantopithecus. However, type B is not a primate. Think of it as a very well developed
canine. A bear is a Ursidae;while in the same suborder as the canidae(dogs,wolves,foxes,etc)it's skull
structure would be different from the true canine. There are only 8 species of bear in the world. Each
species has its own "particular" skull structure: the skull of a black bear is more slooped and narrow
than that of the grizzly-which is shorter,more wide. Each species exhibit their own specific characteristics. The skull structure that I mentioned for type B would be (WAG)more of a canidae
skull than a Ursidae skull. Type B would be more related to a canine than to a bear; a well developed
canine with the ability to: stand up on its hind legs(at least for a short period of time)have well developed "hands"(simular to the racoon-which belongs to the same order and suborder as do canines;
species "Procyonidae"-except the racoon's hands do not have opposing thumbs. Type B might or might
not have hands with opposing thumbs;its abilities to manipulate objects like opening jars, door knobs,
and grasp objects(like the racoon);the capability of standing up on its hind legs plus walking and running on its hind legs;it can change: drop and walk/run on all fours. It would leave footprints of a
canine,a very large canine. Also, based on some of the reports(sightings) of "ears and snout like a dog
or wolf": this would suggest that its skull structure would be canine(canidae) not bear. So, what type B
would be is a very well devoluped canidae, exhibits some of the characteristics of other speices within
the caniformia suborder of the order of carnivora(meat eater);would to some point resemble a giant
wolf,walks/runs upright on its hind legs(though probably not all of the time)possess hands simular to
the racoon but sized for its own build, would tend to be aggressive(such as staring people down,holding
its ground rather than fleeing-these are traits of behavior of the wolf)will take a meal wherever and
however it can get it(roadkill- easy pickings-no chance of being injuried by the prey/no energy consumed during the stalk and kill; so it would absolutely hang out close to roadways. Pastured animals
again easy prey for this creature. All this is a WAG of course. Bigfoot, whatever it really is(and there
could be more than one species-but belonging to the same suborder/order or there could be two or
more unknown bipedial creatures roaming around. Some maybe primate others maybe some kind of
hybred bear-wolf/dog,still others might be some large canine (wolf like)thing that sometimes walks as
a biped. All of this is just guessing. Some of the reports of BF sightings seem to suggest just that.

Different species of deer are all over the world. As are there different monkeys and people for that matter. We lump all of our Bigfoot together as we do other animals is all.They are all different species as can be proven just from the size and style of the tracks alone.

Do you have your encounter posted anywhere W.A.D.?? If not, I'd love to hear about it! . . .by the way, are you related to Greg Allman by any chance??

If I can point out,if you take some of the ladies in here, put there foot prints in the dirt with delecate toes, high arches then put my nasty 14 EEE with no arch would we be from different species.

For certain feet vary in structure. Years ago I had a friend whose foot print looked identicle to this BF print (Patterson print?) He was flat footed and part Native American which he claimed was what gave his walk and foot its unique character. Of course his foot was perfectly normal in size. When I saw the print pic I've posted I immedately thought of the feet of my childhood friend.

Yup, that's a print from the PG filmsite.