Please post what you believe is unhoaxed pictures of a sasquatch.

The Hamilton photo, while a 'blobsquatch" technically. given the time it occured, and the story behind it theres no way to conclusively call it a hoax.

Jim, shouldn't that circle be red?

the most famous one of them all (techincally a movie). I'm still unconvinced either way of hoaxed or not.

I think it was added before the days of computers. :laugh:

Love your sig line. I drive a Fiero. I'm still gonna run over him...err...well at least I'll knee cap him! :new_weirdsmiley:

sorry off topic...

While we're at it--cool avatar, too. Sam Keith rules.

Jim, would you mind sharing the story behind this pic as I'm unfamiliar with it. If there's a link or two covering this, that would be fine too.

Much appreciated,

DTK

The photo doesnt show up in the link but the short descrition is here : http://www.oregonbigfoot.com/gallery.php

Thanks much...

What about this one? I found it last night on the coast to coast website.
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page1281.html

Damn. intresting. Not sure what it is???

Hi nighthunter,
Click on the website, the story is interesting.
klp ;-)

Poplar Ridge has alot of history

It's a goddam llama,Run!!

This picture was discussed on frappr. The general consensus was it was a deer.There may be a thread about
it here somewhere.

Now that you mention it, it does look like a deer.

Ask and you shall receive
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=13962

I do recall this photo from a bigfoot book I read as a kid. The fact that the owner of the film never returned to pick it up actually makes it more suspect to me. This is the first time I've seen it in years.

Here's a lightened copy of the Coast to Coast picture:


Click to view attachment


I'm not sure what to make of it, but I sure couldn't see anything with such a dark picture on Coast to Coast. It could just as easily be a human in those fake Halloween teeth. The thing I find odd is the hair-line, but that can be faked as well so who knows what it is.

Does it look like one of those werewolve masks to anybody?

I do believe it was agreed that it was a deer with some tree twigs in the foregraound which made it look like it had fangs...

My first thought exactly (`specially with them eyes). That tree fork is rather a convenient "hide" as well, concealing a lot (kinda like a puppet theater). `Course if that mutant-deer-critter-thingie were real and anywhere near me, I'd sure as heck be glad for a sizeable chunk o' wood between us. :wink:

Oh! I'm sorry. I didn't realize the thread was closed.

If you check the link in my post on the first page, there is a whole thread debating the deersquatchenwolfstein thingy. A little photo work and it looked clearly like a deer to me.

mule deer

I have studied and researched deer for over 35 years and in all this time I have never seen a deer, or a photo of a deer that looked anything like this does.

Come on folks, this is no deer.

I don't know what it is and I wont even guess as to what. However, I am willing to bet just about anything that I have that this is no deer.

Wrong.
It is clearly a deer, just look at the fangs and hairline. Anyone can tell what it is. :doh:
klp ;-)

Again.........

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=13962

Yup just a deer!

Wait a minute - so that's it? Patty and the Hamilton blobsquatch?

I believe Yetifan has somethning he might be able to contribute here... but even HE is skeptical

Well, that looks pretty good. However, I'm not quite ready to start doleing out my belongings over an etch-a-scetch. We could do that with most any picture and add a bear, squirrel, monkey, even a hyenna if we so desired.

I'm very skeptical about it being a deer. Wasn't the picture supposedly taken in the Adirondacks? Whats a mule deer doing over there? Thats a very long ways from any Mule Deer range. And why would a deer stick around for two pics? Very unlikely.

This picture is most likely a hoax/setup thats just waiting to be picked apart. However, I'm pretty sure you can throw the deer thoery right out of the woods. :bsflag: JMHO.

-------

[edit] Don't take the bait Stace, don't take the bait....

How do you know for certai the pic was even taken in the area claimed? It could very well have come from anywhere else in the USA. Just because they said it was in the Adirondacks doesnt mean thats where it originated.

It's a deer, thats been pretty much proven in the other thread, and if you can't see that.. well...

I don't think you quite realize what the superimposed dear head's intention was. The second picture with the branches edited out is the picture that made it a deer to me. I added the third picture to help those that might not recognize the distinct facial features North American Deer (mule or whitetail) have. The deer head is extrememely transparent. Look on the sections that cross over the tree branch. The creature behind the head fits so well, that it makes the transparancy seem rather solid. If you read the thread, you would also see that the fact that mule deer are not in NewYork was discussed. It could be a rather light faced Whitetail. The fact remains that its a fricken deer, it's so obvious, something not very common in our line of study.

You also speak of a second picture..what second picture? There is only one, and versions of that one. There are the original, then the enchanced, and then you have my edited ones.

Deer fangs... lol Good one. Looks like a German Shepard to me. Whether or not they are branches or teeth it is clear to me that the animal has binocular vision with smaller eyes set on the front of the head like a human or dog, as opposed to multi-directional vision with larger slightly protruding eyes set more to the sides of the head such as a deer, cow, horse, or llama.

It's a dog ,who thinks it's a deer, wearing a werewolf mask.But it definately ain't Bigfoot.

Haven't seen a deer with fangs before? Siberian Musk Deer

Cool looking deer.

That pic is wierd as hell but I'm getting a guy in a werewolf mask vibe on it. I'm not sure how that can be a dar though. I mean unless its really really really pissed off.

EDIT

Nope its a deer. Now thats damn fine research work

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=13962

Hey, back on track people. Forget "blobsquatch", as that is so 20th century. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you "pixelsquatch". Before you Noobs dismiss this outright, I must tell you that this photograph has appeared before on the BFF as a blow-up of a suspected 'Squatch. (Hint to old-timers; Revatex) :laugh:

I may use this for a new avatar...

Your kidding .... right??

Edited to add -- LOL

Actually the correct term would be:

"pixelblobsquatch"

here is one....

:icon_really_happy_guy: :icon_really_happy_guy: :icon_really_happy_guy: :icon_really_happy_guy:

(sigh) If I were Volsquatch it might have been funny... :new_tiredsmiley:

:new_lmaosmiley: ha ha ha ha ha!! That is the wierdest looking deer I've ever seen in my life.

But very cool, that's for the link. :popcorn2:

I have a quick question about blobsquatch does anyone know if anything happened to Zack Hamilton or what?

This is my personal opinion but almost every picture that anyone could post I belives does not show a damn thing. The only thing I have seen online that I believe is a Bigfoot is the patterson film. Every thing else that I have seen are fakes or blobs.
I personally would not post any film/picture that did not show a clear subject matter. I know that I am very picky in what I believe but that is just how I am. That is why I always figured I would be a very poor investigator as I would not believe most of the people reporting things and tell them so. I do believe in Bogfoot and feel that it is a real flesh and blood animal. But I do not believe that 98% of what people say are pictures of them really are.

I had not seen this one before: http://www.tahlequahdailypress.com/feature...eyword=topstory