touch me

three toe print in snow. posted on c 2 c web site. what do you think.is it my eyes playing tricks on me or does the shadows lay different in each print.if so it is a photo shop job.be carefull as the shadow makes it look like a mirror image of what it really is. you can tell that the print on the left is older than the boot print on the right because the boot print still has some cast off on the left side of the heel and the foot print has none as it is melted

Looks like it's raised rather than sunk into the snow, so not a print at all.

that is what i ment about the shadow playing trick on your eyes making it look mirror to what it is or like you said up out of the snow.

Okay...

The guy who submitted this report is named Travis.

It doesn't appear to be a photoshop job.

It bears no resemblence whatever to the more-or-less accepted paradigm of a bigfoot track.

It's more non-evidence.

Why in the world we waste precious hours of our lives on nonsense like this escapes me--and I speak as one who just wasted 10 minutes of his life hereupon.

Inconclusive at best...

Howdy folks...

IMHO...looks like two prints in one, the one I've outlined looks like a smaller shoe print...



The bigger print looks to me like a melt and then a refreze, distorting the original print...

JMO...

First of all, the owner of the photo doesn't claim it to be bigfoot related. He is open to the possibility of thunderbird.

I noticed the foot impression that Jedi mentioned too. Now that could have been made on purpose or it could be a simple misunderstanding. Perhaps some kids were picking up snow with their hands or someone fell over and their glove impression was imprinted? Or the footprint could be coincidental, not pertaining to the impression but was the frozen remanence of an earlier imprint made by a shoe? I believe that the likely scenario is, a child was picking up some snow or removing snow and was crouched down, it's foot maybe made the impression.

Let's not get carried away.

i dont think this is a bigfoot print. i thought it looked funny due to the shadows.i just presented it for discussion. you learn as much looking at non bigfoot/hoaxed/misidentified prints as you do looking at real ones. and for the record i dont think it is a thunderbird print either. that is unless bigfoot shapeshifted into a thunderbird then maybe we can talk :rotflmao:

















DISCLAIMER no i dont believe any shapeshifter crap it was a joke.

Hey I know you didn't ...

Just looks to me like an older bear print that has melted and re-froze a few times distorting it, and then a smaller ( perhaps a child, or adult with a small foot ) print had stepped into the bear print...

Roadrunner...


I think ( no offence ) this to me is the more likely senario, the bigger print ( possibaly a bear ) looks to me a bit older than what I perceive to be a small shoe print, that's just judging by the melt ( if I'm reading the picture right )...

But that's JMO...

It would be interesting to find out if this was the only print found, or if there were more like it...

According to his comments, it seems to be a singular track...



And if he has pictures of the track line as well...

My opinion on all '3-toed Booger' tracks....

Misidentifications.

Emu....Ostrich...
maybe even gators...

but, I don't think 3-toed tracks are Sasquatch related.

I'm looking at it and seeing that bit of twig and leaf litter, and thinking that the smaller print could have disturbed those, when they were lying near the surface of the snow, and solar heating and melting rounded the outline off and the debris slid further down to the other print as it melted. The darker matter would have warmed more than the snow.

I wouldn't even bother documenting a print that featureless unless there were several more of them and stride length could be measured. If there were a sighting involved, then maybe it would be worth something. But a single print, melted out, could be anything.

In fact, if I'd have got photos of the phenomena discussed here...
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=13831
several of them would have been more convincing.

I think the lack of definition and likelihood that it's a slightly unusual melting circumstance, speak quite loudly for it being a genuine photo of nothing very special.

my 0.02

Flash.

Edit: in fact the "toe" to the right seems to not be part of the original disturbance, if you look at the dark speck of debris in it, it seems to be a shallow melt pit formed around that. That's why the shadows look a bit off, it's not as deep as the rest.

And on a third look, I think JediMaster might have drawn the print in a little small, could have been a ladies boot/shoe (look at the heel impression) with the toe a bit pointier and about 1/4 of that lenght longer.

It's a possibility...

I was drinking a little that night ( my eyes seem to get a bit un focussed for some reason when I do that )