I found an interesting plug on a book series.
http://www.sc.edu/library/spcoll/nathist/darwin/darwin7.html
QUOTE
...A preemptive strike in the debate over development
Richard Owen,
"On the Anthropoid Apes,"
Report of the British Association, 33 (1854), part 2: 111-113.
The distinguished anatomist and palaeontologist Richard Owen, who had contributed to Darwin's Zoology of the Beagle, emerged during the 1850s as one of the leading opponents of secular biology. In 1849, a missionary oddly named Savage first reported the existence of a new primate, the gorilla, and Owen, seeing a potential threat to the distinctiveness of humans, obtained specimen gorilla skulls. By the mid-1850s, Wombwell's Menagerie was touring Britain with a live gorilla on display. In this address to the largely-amateur British Association, Owen took up a firm anti-Lamarckian stance, with no space for ideas of species transmutation. He subsequently asserted that the distinctiveness of humanity lay in a single portion of the brain, the hippocampus minor. While Owen would later become the butt of brutal attacks by the Darwinians, especially Huxley, his intransigence in the 1850s warned the still-cautious Darwin about the risks of discussing human evolution until his general theory was established.
Richard Owen,
"On the Anthropoid Apes,"
Report of the British Association, 33 (1854), part 2: 111-113.
The distinguished anatomist and palaeontologist Richard Owen, who had contributed to Darwin's Zoology of the Beagle, emerged during the 1850s as one of the leading opponents of secular biology. In 1849, a missionary oddly named Savage first reported the existence of a new primate, the gorilla, and Owen, seeing a potential threat to the distinctiveness of humans, obtained specimen gorilla skulls. By the mid-1850s, Wombwell's Menagerie was touring Britain with a live gorilla on display. In this address to the largely-amateur British Association, Owen took up a firm anti-Lamarckian stance, with no space for ideas of species transmutation. He subsequently asserted that the distinctiveness of humanity lay in a single portion of the brain, the hippocampus minor. While Owen would later become the butt of brutal attacks by the Darwinians, especially Huxley, his intransigence in the 1850s warned the still-cautious Darwin about the risks of discussing human evolution until his general theory was established.
(Note the "largely amatuer" label; where were the "scientists" then?)
The ideological struggle of Darwin was careful of is still, 150 years later, running hot worldwide. The discovery of the gorilla was as much fodder then as the discovery of sasquatch would be today.
I have read indications that Darwin had written things regarding DuChaillu's discovery. Paul DuChaillu was the Westerner who first acquired and delivered a gorilla specimen to British science, and there was much controversy and disbelief following DuChaillu's discovery. I am still looking for Darwin's written words. I would like to read what he had to say about the gorilla at that time.