Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Full Version: New Ky Sasquatch Video & The Bfro
Anybody hear anything about this new video of a Sasquatch coming out of KY? I don't know if the BFRO is in possession of it right now or if it even has any merit (none according to my source). From what I heard, a local farmer has been feeding at least one and got it all on tape (?). It may just be too early in the investigation for anything more to surface than this. I would like to see it though. Apparently Jane G. has been asked to validate it so some one thinks something good of it. Could not find anything on the web site yet though.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks. Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
News to me.... but then again, with all the stories going around with the
BFRO........ It's hard to say what's true and what is not!
Interesting......
Belle
BFRO........ It's hard to say what's true and what is not!
Interesting......
Belle
check this out http://www.freewebs.com/casr/audiovideo.htm its probably been posted on here before, although i've never seen it
hi bfro researchers here i would be very interested in seeing this new possible ky sasquatch filmfootage it sounds like a very interesting footage. please keep me updated. has there been any resent sightings in ky this month. thanks bill green 
QUOTE(damndirtyape @ Jul 26 2005, 12:25 PM)
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks. Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.A database yard sale if you will.
I wouldn't mind getting a copy of the database framework myself. Already have all the reports on CD.
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jul 27 2005, 02:45 AM)
QUOTE(damndirtyape @ Jul 26 2005, 12:25 PM)
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks. Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.A database yard sale if you will.
I wouldn't mind getting a copy of the database framework myself. Already have all the reports on CD.
I'll bet my bottom dollar that you don't have all of the reports which he has in his possession.
QUOTE(damndirtyape @ Jul 26 2005, 10:25 AM)
Anybody hear anything about this new video of a Sasquatch coming out of KY? I don't know if the BFRO is in possession of it right now or if it even has any merit (none according to my source). From what I heard, a local farmer has been feeding at least one and got it all on tape (?). It may just be too early in the investigation for anything more to surface than this. I would like to see it though. Apparently Jane G. has been asked to validate it so some one thinks something good of it. Could not find anything on the web site yet though.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks. Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.Rick,
I honestly don't have much faith in this KY situation. The story has a definite Janice Coy ring to it. When several Curators questioned the newest pay-to-be-a-member Investigator handling the situation, we were told to back off in the rudest manner imaginable. We were not allowed to question the situation, only praise it. That is very suspect to me.
Perhaps I am wrong (it happens on occasion
) but I think this situation is being pumped up to be far more than it is. In a way, I do hope I am wrong. I would love to see very clear footage of a real sasquatch. Since I quit the BFRO today, I doubt I will see it unless it hits the big screen so to speak.
Redwolf
aka Kathy Harper
former BFRO Curator
QUOTE(Redwolf @ Jul 27 2005, 03:39 AM)
...Since I quit the BFRO today, I doubt I will see it unless it hits the big screen so to speak.
Redwolf
aka Kathy Harper
former BFRO Curator
Redwolf
aka Kathy Harper
former BFRO Curator
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 27 2005, 03:47 AM)
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
QUOTE(Volsquatch @ Jul 26 2005, 03:48 PM)
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 27 2005, 03:47 AM)
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
WOW!
QUOTE(billgreen2005bigfoot @ Jul 26 2005, 08:34 PM)
hi bfro researchers here i would be very interested in seeing this new possible ky sasquatch filmfootage it sounds like a very interesting footage. please keep me updated. has there been any resent sightings in ky this month. thanks bill green
hi everyone i wonder how the weather was that day this possible footage of a sasquatch creature taken. i know kentucky has been haveing severe weather maybe thats forceing the sasquatch creatures in kentucky to move around more now becouse of the heatwaves so they are seen by more people and that sasquatch creatures are looking for water and food . also the creatures are trying to move cooler areas in kentucky. im sure the bfro will keep us posted. thanks bill green
Kathy, Fish, I'm proud of you guys. 
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jul 26 2005, 03:56 PM)
Kathy, Fish, I'm proud of you guys.
Yup.
Still sad to see.
Belle
The BFRO used to be pretty good. I enjoyed reading the sightings pages, etc. What happened?
QUOTE(billgreen2005bigfoot @ Jul 26 2005, 03:54 PM)
im sure the bfro will keep us posted. thanks bill green
That is if anyone is left.
QUOTE(Gnostosis @ Jul 26 2005, 02:17 PM)
check this out http://www.freewebs.com/casr/audiovideo.htm its probably been posted on here before, although i've never seen it
I can't seem to download that audio... besides, it keeps crashing...
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jul 27 2005, 03:56 AM)
Kathy, Fish, I'm proud of you guys.
I'm very proud of them as well. Who's next to see the light? Hairy Man? RB?
[edit]ARsquatch?
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jul 26 2005, 05:56 PM)
Kathy, Fish, I'm proud of you guys.
:clap: :clap: :clap:
Feels pretty good, doesn't it?
Welcome to the club Kathy and Tim.
John
John
So is there going to be a support group formed???
For anyone who decides to stay with the BFRO, I support your decision 100% also. Only each individual knows what's right for them.
Bigfoot on a farm in Kentucky huh? Well, don't that beat all.
Bigfoot on a farm in Kentucky huh? Well, don't that beat all.
QUOTE
For anyone who decides to stay with the BFRO, I support your decision 100% also. Only each individual knows what's right for them.
QUOTE
Bigfoot on a farm in Kentucky huh? Well, don't that beat all.
It's got me beat.....
It does smell....MG
Belle
damn tags. :doh:
im sure the bfro will put this new kentucky sasquatch sighting with the mention of the footage in the resent reports section of their great website. i wonder if it be either a class a sighting or class b sighting if they decide to put it in the resent sightings section. i hope the bfro will a follow up investigation to it. thanks bill green
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jul 27 2005, 04:55 AM)
For anyone who decides to stay with the BFRO, I support your decision 100% also. Only each individual knows what's right for them.
Couldn't have said it better myself, J.
Whoever decides to stay, then that's their decision, and their's only.
QUOTE(Volsquatch @ Jul 26 2005, 03:24 PM)
I'll bet my bottom dollar that you don't have all of the reports which he has in his possession.
*Wink wink...nudge nudge*
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jul 26 2005, 03:47 PM)
QUOTE(Volsquatch @ Jul 26 2005, 03:24 PM)
I'll bet my bottom dollar that you don't have all of the reports which he has in his possession.
*Wink wink...nudge nudge*
You must like getting people's panties in a wad, huh? Don't make me bring out the RB again....cause I will....
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Jul 26 2005, 06:09 PM)
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jul 26 2005, 03:47 PM)
QUOTE(Volsquatch @ Jul 26 2005, 03:24 PM)
I'll bet my bottom dollar that you don't have all of the reports which he has in his possession.
*Wink wink...nudge nudge*
You must like getting people's panties in a wad, huh? Don't make me bring out the RB again....cause I will....
Like I said....as long as he's not wearing YOUR panties when you bring him out it'll be alright.
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 26 2005, 02:47 PM)
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
From all the information that I have received - you were one of the best they had.
It must be very hard to leave something that you have put so much hard work and honest effort into.
Good luck in your future endeavors.
I've just been chosen as a BFRO curator!!!!!!! They still have a few openings...anyone interested? It doesn't cost that much. I had to send some dude named $-maker a blank check. He said he would fill in the amount and call me when he needs something. 
QUOTE(Redwolf @ Jul 26 2005, 03:39 PM)
QUOTE(damndirtyape @ Jul 26 2005, 10:25 AM)
Anybody hear anything about this new video of a Sasquatch coming out of KY? I don't know if the BFRO is in possession of it right now or if it even has any merit (none according to my source). From what I heard, a local farmer has been feeding at least one and got it all on tape (?). It may just be too early in the investigation for anything more to surface than this. I would like to see it though. Apparently Jane G. has been asked to validate it so some one thinks something good of it. Could not find anything on the web site yet though.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks. Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.
Do other Sasquatch research organizations lease the BFRO database for display on their web sites? What year will the BFRO database be up for sale? Just thinking out of the box folks.
Someone had to ask it... might as well be me.Rick,
I honestly don't have much faith in this KY situation. The story has a definite Janice Coy ring to it. When several Curators questioned the newest pay-to-be-a-member Investigator handling the situation, we were told to back off in the rudest manner imaginable. We were not allowed to question the situation, only praise it. That is very suspect to me.
Perhaps I am wrong (it happens on occasion
) but I think this situation is being pumped up to be far more than it is. In a way, I do hope I am wrong. I would love to see very clear footage of a real sasquatch. Since I quit the BFRO today, I doubt I will see it unless it hits the big screen so to speak.
Redwolf
aka Kathy Harper
former BFRO Curator
Here we go again! I'm sure ACA is sending their best as we speak
As I said in your other post Kathy, I support you and I also support Fish aka Tim!
Cut4sign
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jul 26 2005, 04:11 PM)
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Jul 26 2005, 06:09 PM)
QUOTE(Bitter Monk @ Jul 26 2005, 03:47 PM)
QUOTE(Volsquatch @ Jul 26 2005, 03:24 PM)
I'll bet my bottom dollar that you don't have all of the reports which he has in his possession.
*Wink wink...nudge nudge*
You must like getting people's panties in a wad, huh? Don't make me bring out the RB again....cause I will....
Like I said....as long as he's not wearing YOUR panties when you bring him out it'll be alright.
RB can't wear my panties...cause you borrowed them and never gave them back! I bet pink looks very good on you.
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Jul 27 2005, 10:32 AM)
RB can't wear my panties...cause you borrowed them and never gave them back! I bet pink looks very good on you.
Actually I'm using them as a tarp while I repair the doghouse roof. Hope you don't mind.
That's it...it's time for a spanking!
Pull down those sequins tights, bend over, and take it like...um...a...um...Bitter Monk!
:dance:
edited to add a Bitter Monk dancing smilie
Pull down those sequins tights, bend over, and take it like...um...a...um...Bitter Monk!
:dance:
edited to add a Bitter Monk dancing smilie
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Jul 27 2005, 10:50 AM)
That's it...it's time for a spanking!
Pull down those sequins tights, bend over, and take it like...um...a...um...Bitter Monk!
:dance:
edited to add a Bitter Monk dancing smilie
Pull down those sequins tights, bend over, and take it like...um...a...um...Bitter Monk!
:dance:
edited to add a Bitter Monk dancing smilie
Ssshhhhhhhh......you're gonna make RB jealous.
The pictures I'm getting in my head are really not good! :yuck: :yuck: :help: :willies:
QUOTE(relicthief @ Jul 26 2005, 05:25 PM)
So is there going to be a support group formed???
A support group??? We don't need no stinking support group! We all need to get together and have one hellacious kegger!!!
QUOTE(rockinkt @ Jul 26 2005, 08:49 PM)
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 26 2005, 02:47 PM)
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
From all the information that I have received - you were one of the best they had.
It must be very hard to leave something that you have put so much hard work and honest effort into.
Good luck in your future endeavors.
Thank you, Rockinkt. Thank you very much. I really do appreciate that.
i got the video to play, but it was so small i couldnt really see anything. except maybe some tracks.
edited to say that this is the first i heard of a kentucky video, and kath and tim, i'm sure the bfro is sad to see you go
edited to say that this is the first i heard of a kentucky video, and kath and tim,
i'm sure the bfro is sad to see you go
Hi there!
I just surf and post, so I'm outta the loop.
As an honest fan of the BFRO website, even though two summers ago they booted me after a month for wise-acre un-PC remarks that I still believe pointed out discrepancies in an account from a Native American tribal elder of hoaxing the 1958 prints, why the exodus?
Really?
If I'm reading a new report on the BFRO, I want at least to believe in some amount of credibility in the investigations of reports.
I sense from the previous posts that perhaps sighting inflation, or better yet inflated evaluation, is occurring.
If not, and numbers of new reports are really down due to summer doldrums, no need for details, but is it simply a conflict in approaches to research rather than a credibility issue?
Like it or not, the BFRO is the only organization with enough steam to have mainstream media with questions come to it when heavily publicized accounts of BF sightings occur.
I don't know any answers because I don't know the questions.
For those of us who believe, are not in the loop, have found a beacon of scientific and sound thinking at the BFRO, and still will until shown otherwise, what is happening so that we may know and alter our perceptions accordingly?
I am making no judgment call. I may be naive, but this issue is well worth a little education for the naive.
Thanks!
DR
I just surf and post, so I'm outta the loop.
As an honest fan of the BFRO website, even though two summers ago they booted me after a month for wise-acre un-PC remarks that I still believe pointed out discrepancies in an account from a Native American tribal elder of hoaxing the 1958 prints, why the exodus?
Really?
If I'm reading a new report on the BFRO, I want at least to believe in some amount of credibility in the investigations of reports.
I sense from the previous posts that perhaps sighting inflation, or better yet inflated evaluation, is occurring.
If not, and numbers of new reports are really down due to summer doldrums, no need for details, but is it simply a conflict in approaches to research rather than a credibility issue?
Like it or not, the BFRO is the only organization with enough steam to have mainstream media with questions come to it when heavily publicized accounts of BF sightings occur.
I don't know any answers because I don't know the questions.
For those of us who believe, are not in the loop, have found a beacon of scientific and sound thinking at the BFRO, and still will until shown otherwise, what is happening so that we may know and alter our perceptions accordingly?
I am making no judgment call. I may be naive, but this issue is well worth a little education for the naive.
Thanks!
DR
QUOTE(rockinkt @ Jul 26 2005, 07:49 PM)
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 26 2005, 02:47 PM)
Rick,
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
I completely agree with everything Kathy said. The only difference is that I quit on Saturday.
Fishbone35
aka Tim Cullen
former BFRO Curator
From all the information that I have received - you were one of the best they had.
It must be very hard to leave something that you have put so much hard work and honest effort into.
Good luck in your future endeavors.
[QUOTE]
Mark the calendar.
I agree completely with Rockinkt.
DR
I hope I didn't stir anything up for anybody. That was not my intent. Honestly. I have been in this for quite awhile now and would just liked to have seen something like this beforehand, out of common courtesy (I sent the latest I was working on to the BFRO with no response from Matt at all)... instead of seeing it on some big screen years later after the press have had their day with it. Peer review opinion should be sought out, if it can add anything. Remember all the questions failed to be asked of the Patterson film? If that is the way to play this game I am definitely going to have to get a bear cache... did I say bear? I meant beer.
Been there RB and Kathy. Feel free to move about the cabin now. The captain has turned off the seatbelt sign.
Been there RB and Kathy. Feel free to move about the cabin now. The captain has turned off the seatbelt sign.
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Jul 27 2005, 07:16 PM)
QUOTE(relicthief @ Jul 26 2005, 05:25 PM)
So is there going to be a support group formed???
A support group??? We don't need no stinking support group! We all need to get together and have one hellacious kegger!!!
Now there is an idea I can get behind!!!
btw: you know you can rent refer trucks now that can tap 6 kegs at a time and hold several more
QUOTE
If I'm reading a new report on the BFRO, I want at least to believe in some amount of credibility in the investigations of reports.
Perhaps I am being naive as well (ok not perhaps), but I considered material on the BFRO site to be as close to gospel as I could find. I had total confidence in what I was reading until they posted the "samurai" sound clip. I sat here in utter disbelief, and then I got angry (at myself). Kinda burst my bubble...
I did, however, get a reply once from a curator when I asked about an article I read. It dealt with a guy in Sulphur leaving cans of soda in the woods for sasquatch. He was gathering fingerprints? The reply I recieved stated emphatically that the guy who claimed to be studying prints was a "known charlatan".
QUOTE(DarkRabbit @ Jul 27 2005, 11:25 PM)
As an honest fan of the BFRO website, even though two summers ago they booted me after a month for wise-acre un-PC remarks that I still believe pointed out discrepancies in an account from a Native American tribal elder of hoaxing the 1958 prints
Oh yeah, I remember you. I hope you have learned and grown from that experience.
damndirtyape wrote:
QUOTE
Been there RB and Kathy. Feel free to move about the cabin now. The captain has turned off the seatbelt sign.
I'm not doing anything until I get my panties back from Bitter Monk. I need them for a parachute.
QUOTE(Hairy Man @ Jul 28 2005, 09:27 AM)
QUOTE(DarkRabbit @ Jul 27 2005, 11:25 PM)
As an honest fan of the BFRO website, even though two summers ago they booted me after a month for wise-acre un-PC remarks that I still believe pointed out discrepancies in an account from a Native American tribal elder of hoaxing the 1958 prints
Oh yeah, I remember you. I hope you have learned and grown from that experience.
damndirtyape wrote:
QUOTE
Been there RB and Kathy. Feel free to move about the cabin now. The captain has turned off the seatbelt sign.
I'm not doing anything until I get my panties back from Bitter Monk. I need them for a parachute.
Hairy Man:
Wah hah hah!!!!!
"I remember you!"
I hope I have learned.
What a jerk I was! Or at least I have a better idea when to broadcast it and when not to.
Ha hah ha!
You got me in stitches.
I will stick with my opinion of the veracity of the elder's account, meaning I believed he was trying to employ a ruse to keep investigators away. No need to tear up his ground. I'm very sympathetic to that notion.
I freely confess that I do know my agent provocateur method gained nothing. Hopefully, the mea culpa rests in the genuine tolerance of my posts here for those equally tolerant.
You have my sincerest apologies. And thanks for a hearty laugh that someone caught on that I was the rapscallion.
Believe it or not, the years sail by and I can't recognize myself years before.
Thank you for your post!!!! I do try to be good, but I fall off the wagon here and there.
DR
Dark Rabbit - it's all water under the bridge. Don't worry about it. Glad to see you in here!
My, my! 
Found on another forum.
The only thing I take issue with in this statement is the fact that the witness claimed there was porn on the tape when in fact during the first information posted it was stated quite clearly that the witness had to rewind the tape several times in order to get his "awesome" footage. My question, as it has been from the beginning was, "Wouldn't the "porn" have been recorded over if that were the case?"
As for the rest, well, while I can't claim credit for sending this tidbit out (damnit!), I can state that it is true.
(Also, I've edited out the pertinent information. However, it can easily be found...elsewhere, if the reader is so inclined.)
QUOTE
**** - I have some important info for you. Matt
Moneymaker has been working with an a*****e named
G**** C*** on a video of a bigfoot filmed in Kentucky.
The video was about a 15 second clip but is now
around 7 because the stupid people who filmed it used
the same videotape that they taped some home porn on
and in an effort to erase the porn, deleted part of
the bigfoot.
They have new video showing a bigfoot reaching over a
berm, picking up a plate of pancakes, eating it with
its back turned from the camera and licking it's
fingers. The video was taped at night, 150 yards
aways from a camera with IR abilities. Obviously it
isn't that good, but Matt and G**** plan on selling
the video to the public for $29.95. G**** is running
the show. He has told people that he has complete
creative licence on the video and without him, he'll
shut everything down. Matt is running so scared of
him that he is doing everything that G**** says.
I do not have the name and address of the people who
own the property. But if you want to get ahold of
G**** here is his number and email: 8**-5**-7*** and
********@yahoo.com .
You probably haven't heard that a whole bunch of
curators have left the BFRO because of G****. Some
very big names that haven't been announced yet, but
you get this info first, because we know you will use
it wisely. Warning, though, G**** C*** is a major a*****e.
Moneymaker has been working with an a*****e named
G**** C*** on a video of a bigfoot filmed in Kentucky.
The video was about a 15 second clip but is now
around 7 because the stupid people who filmed it used
the same videotape that they taped some home porn on
and in an effort to erase the porn, deleted part of
the bigfoot.
They have new video showing a bigfoot reaching over a
berm, picking up a plate of pancakes, eating it with
its back turned from the camera and licking it's
fingers. The video was taped at night, 150 yards
aways from a camera with IR abilities. Obviously it
isn't that good, but Matt and G**** plan on selling
the video to the public for $29.95. G**** is running
the show. He has told people that he has complete
creative licence on the video and without him, he'll
shut everything down. Matt is running so scared of
him that he is doing everything that G**** says.
I do not have the name and address of the people who
own the property. But if you want to get ahold of
G**** here is his number and email: 8**-5**-7*** and
********@yahoo.com .
You probably haven't heard that a whole bunch of
curators have left the BFRO because of G****. Some
very big names that haven't been announced yet, but
you get this info first, because we know you will use
it wisely. Warning, though, G**** C*** is a major a*****e.
Found on another forum.
The only thing I take issue with in this statement is the fact that the witness claimed there was porn on the tape when in fact during the first information posted it was stated quite clearly that the witness had to rewind the tape several times in order to get his "awesome" footage. My question, as it has been from the beginning was, "Wouldn't the "porn" have been recorded over if that were the case?"
As for the rest, well, while I can't claim credit for sending this tidbit out (damnit!), I can state that it is true.
(Also, I've edited out the pertinent information. However, it can easily be found...elsewhere, if the reader is so inclined.)
QUOTE(Fishbone35 @ Aug 2 2005, 11:44 AM)
The only thing I take issue with in this statement is the fact that the witness claimed there was porn on the tape when in fact during the first information posted it was stated quite clearly that the witness had to rewind the tape several times in order to get his "awesome" footage. My question, as it has been from the beginning was, "Wouldn't the "porn" have been recorded over if that were the case?"
Yeah, but it almost seems like they were embarrased to have the porn on the same tape, and recorded something over it to "erase" the porn part, but went too far and went over some of the bf footage as well.
Make sense?
In the famous words of Gomer Pyle..."Shazam"!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.