Josh Willard
Jun 22 2005, 08:31 PM
Anyone see this pic before?
Maheekat
Jun 22 2005, 08:32 PM
Oh boy....
Teresa
Jun 22 2005, 08:48 PM
Looks like a guy in a jacket with the hood up to me.
Blackbear
Jun 22 2005, 08:50 PM
It kinda looks like a guy in a hooded raincoat holding a stick or a fishing rod or something...and the ridges on the legs look like he was wearing some sort of jeans or something...
Josh Willard
Jun 22 2005, 08:51 PM
tugboatwa
Jun 23 2005, 12:43 AM
from
http://www.kevinkimberley.com/QUOTE
Bigfoot: Picture Proof!
Near Harrison Lake, BC, June 22, 2004
I never thought I would be writing this. I apologize for my nervousness, but I think you will find it is justified. Just look at the goddamn picture! I can't believe I finally have proof in my hands that the creature I have been searching for does exist! It has been a long journey and I am shaking as I write this, please bear with me.
God, I am so freaked out. This picture was taken June 22, 2004 about a three hour drive and an additional eight hour hike outside Vancouver, BC. I really don't want to disclose the exact location to anybody outside my search team. Certainly not until a proper investigation can be carried out by my fellow crypto zoologists. I will wait until my nerves calm down however, before I return to this very remote area.
Well I guess I should stop blabbering and tell how it happened. My search team and I had been in the area for three days and this was the last morning we were there. We were camped on the edge of a very high alpine lake, as you can see by the snow and heavy fog. We had been very hopeful of contact since the area is so remote, but still very close to an area that has a long history of Bigfoot activity. The lake was chosen since it is well stocked with fish, obviously artificially stocked, and they can be caught in the shallow water while they search for food. Anyway it made sense to identify this high protein food source in such a harsh environment.
The search was carried out in the regular fashion. A base camp was established at a high altitude where we could see three fairly large valleys sloping down and away from us. One of which held the lake. We used a low intrusion style camp with no cooked food or fire. We went on daily excursions along the barren ridge tops, leaving early at around 5:00 am each morning. Typically stopping at about 6:00 am to survey each new area with a field scope to look for any movement or activity. We were rarely separated as we all prefer to work in a single group. This also better covers the territory and minimizes any scent drift.
We had no visuals or strange odours at all, until the last morning that is. The day the photo was taken. We had woken up early as usual. There was some debate amongst the group whether to continue with a morning search or to head straight home since it was going to be a long hard walk back to the truck. I guess luckily for us, those wanting to head home, won the argument. We broke camp and headed down to the lake a about 5:25 am. That's when things went very weird.
We had reached the edge of the lake and luckily we had been very quiet in our approach, old habits die hard I guess. We were just about to fill some water bottles from the shore when we were overcome by a horrible odour. The only thing I could compare it to would be the rotting flesh of a long since dead animal. Fearing it was either a grizzly, or better yet a Bigfoot, we went absolute stealth mode and dropped our packs to the ground without so much as a twig snapping. All our hearts were pounding as we went through the plan in silence. Using the signals and code we had been practicing for years.
It was a difficult situation since there was hardly any wind. This made it next to impossible to determine where the source of the stench was. We decided that two of us would remain with the gear. The other two would follow the edge of the lake in the direction of what little wind was blowing. I led the group around the shore. It was tough going since the edge of the lake was incredible rocky, steep and covered in wet snow. We finally reached a formidable wall of rock that we knew protected a small bay and peninsula on the other side. This is how viewing the terrain from the ridge line above can sure pay off.
Climbing up and over the wall of rock required me to leave my weapon, something I truly regret every minute since that decision. With some help I was able to get a foothold and pull myself up high enough to see the bay behind. What I saw in the instant I peered over the top, was pretty much what is in the picture. For some reason the creature was totally fixated on the water. This gave me enough time to grab my digital camera, which was hanging around my neck thank god, and snap the picture you see above.
Every time I look at this picture, my heart pumps as I remember the build up to the moment I stood up and saw it just standing there with its huge back towards me. After taking the first picture, I pulled the camera back to make sure I had the image captured. There it was in the tiny viewfinder. I quickly looked up again and the creature had swung around to the left of the picture where the large rock sits in the water behind a single tree. He looked back briefly as he disappeared up the shore behind the trees. We regrouped where I had taken the picture and began to chase after the creature up the shoreline. As we did so we could hear rocks sliding down as he climbed up a scree slope at the far end of the lake. We found no prints as the creature seemed, even in the brief moment I saw him, to travel on the rocks close to the shore which had lost their snow due to the retained heat of the water. Perhaps this would explain the numerous times tracks are never found after good sightings. The creature may be well aware of his own tracks.
I can't explain how frustrated I am that I had laid down my rifle only moments before this all happened. I had been using the .270 Winchester Ranger I have always brought with me. I could have easily taken two or maybe even three shots at the animal. I know that I have taken a lot of criticism from other researchers for my use of guns. I am unfortunately a broken man as I think back on what could have been. When I popped up over that rock cliff I had almost 4-5 seconds to take aim and possibly end what is the longest running zoological debate in history with the most concrete of evidence, a huge steaming corpse! Until then the search continues and I will fight the battle with this rare and valuable picture.
tugboatwa
Jun 23 2005, 12:45 AM
I have to agree with ARsquatch and Blackbear.
Also reminds me of the Marble Mountain video, only closer.
Devious Ape
Jun 23 2005, 10:25 AM
All of the times (to my knowledge) of anyone surprising a sassy & getting a photo/video/film it has been running away from the camera, not just standing there posing. These animals have the most extreme woodcraft skills, so they would have to be distracted, or have some sort of ambient noise to mask the approach of humans.
Are there any other photos from this proported event? If the proported animal ran up a slope and made sign as it dislodged rocks, that is still evidence. It just didn't materialize there... Did they check for tracks coming in? What of the other witnesses? Statements from them would be nice. IMHO, analysis of the area after a sighting can be just as informative as the sighting itself.
A problem with the amatuer investigator is that the "big photo" is sought after and more subtle evidence is ignored.
Please excuse my rant. :pinch:
JayleeD
Jun 23 2005, 10:29 AM
It just makes me wanna yell "JUMP....go ahead JUMP".
dude
Jun 23 2005, 10:31 AM
It looks like a lot of things. What is it? It has the bulk of the alledged BF in the PG film. Having said that these animals are not all that elusive because PG caught one on film riding horse etc. and there are several people on this forum who have happened upon BF's before
Devious Ape
Jun 23 2005, 10:37 AM
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jun 23 2005, 08:29 AM)
It just makes me wanna yell "JUMP....go ahead JUMP".

Or...
"The Hills Are ALIVE... With The Sound Of Music!"
dude
Jun 23 2005, 10:39 AM
It may just be the photo of a BF at his wits end. He has spent a life time trying to convince peopel he is real. Alas poor BF
Devious Ape
Jun 23 2005, 10:42 AM
QUOTE(dude @ Jun 23 2005, 08:39 AM)
It may just be the photo of a BF at his wits end. He has spent a life time trying to convince peopel he is real. Alas poor BF

Sassy #1: "Aww, Man!"
Sassy #2: "What?"
Sassy #1: "You can't take a pee off a cliff anymore without some guy snapping your picture!"
dude
Jun 23 2005, 10:43 AM
MAN! don't I know it
Moonlite
Jun 23 2005, 05:36 PM
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jun 23 2005, 10:29 AM)
It just makes me wanna yell "JUMP....go ahead JUMP".

To who - the subject of the photo or the photographer?
shaman
Jun 25 2005, 01:50 PM
uh huh, righto. glad he dropped his rifle or he would be facing murder charges if he shot that guy in hooded jacket. hunting squatch on purpose with a 270? sure its a killer round, gut gosh....a 270?
having said that, ill make a statement for the real world.
you never, NEVER, EVER drop your weapon, not under any circumstances. pack, gear, camera, cheetos, everything and i mean EVERYTHING, even clothes, goes before your weapon. i think others here will agree.
Josh Willard
Jun 25 2005, 02:00 PM
I like that B.S. meter, shaman!
JohnWS
Jun 25 2005, 02:24 PM
Erm..... Three hikers leaving a hill top, anybody?
Well four if you count the photographer - I use the term losely

.
Gigantofootecus
Jun 25 2005, 03:23 PM
QUOTE(Woodshadow @ Jun 25 2005, 02:24 PM)
Erm..... Three hikers leaving a hill top, anybody?
Well four if you count the photographer - I use the term losely

.
Yep. Probably the last pic taken of the crew before descending.
QUOTE(Devious Ape)
A problem with the amatuer investigator is that the "big photo" is sought after and more subtle evidence is ignored.
Yep. If this guy would have taken another pic with his buddy in the same spot...wait a minute, he did. Never mind.
Chewy
Jun 25 2005, 03:59 PM
QUOTE
It has the bulk of the alledged BF in the PG film
Please go look at the girth of Patty's legs again.
jimf
Jun 25 2005, 04:08 PM
QUOTE(Devious Ape @ Jun 23 2005, 11:25 AM)
A problem with the amatuer investigator is that the "big photo" is sought after and more subtle evidence is ignored.
As opposed to the proffesional investigators who have..??????????
BluffCreek35
Jun 26 2005, 11:20 PM
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jun 23 2005, 10:29 AM)
It just makes me wanna yell "JUMP....go ahead JUMP".


:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
BluffCreek35
Devious Ape
Jun 27 2005, 10:21 AM
QUOTE(jimf @ Jun 25 2005, 02:08 PM)
QUOTE(Devious Ape @ Jun 23 2005, 11:25 AM)
A problem with the amatuer investigator is that the "big photo" is sought after and more subtle evidence is ignored.
As opposed to the proffesional investigators who have..??????????
Good point.
walkingcarpet
Jun 27 2005, 11:02 AM
Now, let's not dimiss this guy out of hand--after all, he's a comedian, a writer and an engineer. Lousy photographer, though.
I love how every link on his website goes right back to the main page. Good stuff.
I, also, would like to hear from the other witnesses. Then we could make fun of them, too.
micahn
Jun 27 2005, 11:30 AM
QUOTE(ARsquatch @ Jun 22 2005, 08:48 PM)
Looks like a guy in a jacket with the hood up to me.
I am with you and think you are dead on.
Also you can see they person is wearing jeans it looks like. Look at right above and left ankle lol you can see where they are a little long and are bunching up there :-)
micahn
Jun 27 2005, 11:34 AM
QUOTE(Moonlite @ Jun 23 2005, 05:36 PM)
QUOTE(JayleeD @ Jun 23 2005, 10:29 AM)
It just makes me wanna yell "JUMP....go ahead JUMP".

To who - the subject of the photo or the photographer?
Both
GrandCherokee
Jun 27 2005, 01:30 PM
This bizarre photo and even more bizarre photographer first appeared in this thread...
http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=7749&st=20
roypye123
Jun 27 2005, 06:37 PM
:doh: Give me a break!
PinelandsResearcher
Jun 27 2005, 06:57 PM
Ocoee
Jul 9 2005, 12:50 AM
QUOTE(JVD @ Jun 22 2005, 10:51 PM)
I think it is Gumby's cousin:

Actually my first impression? It is a very artistic looking photo with nice blurry trees, and a dramatic looking silhouette of a monster blob over to one side, off-center, just the way an artist would paint it, and therefore probably a hoax.
Crazy Ape
Jul 12 2005, 12:17 PM
Hey guys..... I don't post much, but this one prompted a few thoughts.
If some one knows this guy, ask him to go back to that location and snap a photo or two of someone of normal size standing in that spot. Couldn't be all that hard. If it's really from 2004 then the best landmark feature, the tree, wouldn't have changed that much. I agree it looks like a guy with his hood up, but we never know. This is another case where we'll never know for sure... you'll only get so close to a reasonable answer. If he's really an investigator, I would think he'd exhaust himself trying to prove what it's not. If it is much larger than a friend of his posing in the same locale, then it's a another check mark in his column.
Something else too. I take pictures from time to time of live action things... and I've found it pretty beneficial to take several shots at a time and hope one turns out later rather than taking the pic and reviewing it then. You lose the moment that way. Easy for me to say though.... I've never been around a bigfoot. I can't cast a stone at those that have. Just constructive critiquing.
My 2/100 of a dollar.
Regards BF'ers.....
John
BenThere_2
Jul 15 2005, 04:47 AM
If you footers believe this one ........................
I want you to ship me some of whatever you been smoking!
Good heavens
xpert4u
Jul 23 2005, 04:11 AM
hvns
Aug 22 2005, 08:31 AM
I think I had seen that picture was proven to be a guy in a hooded jacket but I can't recall the site it was on, I'll have to do a mass search of my links. But then again I could be wrong.
scotto
Aug 25 2005, 09:16 PM
QUOTE(hvns @ Aug 22 2005, 08:31 AM)
I think I had seen that picture was proven to be a guy in a hooded jacket but I can't recall the site it was on, I'll have to do a mass search of my links. But then again I could be wrong.

I think you're right, looks just like that to me.
zartimus
Aug 26 2005, 10:26 AM
http://www.kevinkimberley.com/But he's a Comedian, Writer, and an Engineer, Who can argue with creds like that!<grin>...
Forget the picture being fake, the written depiction was so 'constructed' to take care of any possible slip-ups it reeked of reverse engineering.
Maybe he's a better Comedian...
adamsclimber
Aug 26 2005, 12:28 PM
Well, why not ask the guy wearing the pack in the background if he noticed anything?
Whatwasdat
Aug 26 2005, 08:08 PM
I`d have to say a human -look at the twigs for legs and short arms and last I knew there is`nt a perfectly straight stick to be found in the woods.
:bffrules:
Bitter Monk
Aug 26 2005, 08:29 PM
QUOTE(BenThere_2 @ Jul 15 2005, 06:47 AM)
If you footers believe this one ........................
I want you to ship me some of whatever you been smoking!
Good heavens
Quoted for the truth.
Gee4orce
Aug 30 2005, 07:12 AM
QUOTE(shaman @ Jun 25 2005, 01:50 PM)
you never, NEVER, EVER drop your weapon, not under any circumstances. pack, gear, camera, cheetos, everything and i mean EVERYTHING, even clothes, goes before your weapon. i think others here will agree.
I think you're confusing that with your axe or knife. If I was going to be stranded in the woods naked with just one item, I'd take my axe or a good knife any day before a rifle. Ever try making a shelter with a rifle ?
scooter72
Aug 30 2005, 08:26 AM
OK,heres something that puts a hole in his story as well. According to him, its a 3hour drive and an 8 hour HIKE to this spot, yet it's "artificially" stocked with fish. Um, yea, ok, the Game Department must fly these trout in and dump them out of a helicopter.
MightyMet
Aug 30 2005, 02:22 PM
QUOTE(scooter72 @ Aug 30 2005, 08:26 AM)
OK,heres something that puts a hole in his story as well. According to him, its a 3hour drive and an 8 hour HIKE to this spot, yet it's "artificially" stocked with fish. Um, yea, ok, the Game Department must fly these trout in and dump them out of a helicopter.
Nice observation and a very good point.
t.steenburg
Sep 1 2005, 01:39 AM
:rolleyes: It looks to me like a full lengh parka with hood rather than just a jacket. Simluer to the old green ones issued in the canadian army. It must have been cold that day where they were. Is that snow on the ground behind him?
Thomas Steenburg
damndirtyape
Sep 1 2005, 06:37 AM
QUOTE(scooter72 @ Aug 30 2005, 09:26 AM)
OK,heres something that puts a hole in his story as well. According to him, its a 3hour drive and an 8 hour HIKE to this spot, yet it's "artificially" stocked with fish. Um, yea, ok, the Game Department must fly these trout in and dump them out of a helicopter.
In fact they do this regularly for a variety of reasons... fisherman, local wildlife, curtailing alge growth, etc. They use a heilcopter with a big bucket slung underneath full of water and fingerlings. Fly up and dump them in mountain lakes.
Hairy Man
Sep 1 2005, 10:00 AM
Yep, they sure do! Nothing like seeing a helicopter with a bucket of fish below it, heading for a remote wilderness lake.... doesn't that make them flying fish??
QUOTE(damndirtyape @ Sep 1 2005, 04:37 AM)
QUOTE(scooter72 @ Aug 30 2005, 09:26 AM)
OK,heres something that puts a hole in his story as well. According to him, its a 3hour drive and an 8 hour HIKE to this spot, yet it's "artificially" stocked with fish. Um, yea, ok, the Game Department must fly these trout in and dump them out of a helicopter.
In fact they do this regularly for a variety of reasons... fisherman, local wildlife, curtailing alge growth, etc. They use a heilcopter with a big bucket slung underneath full of water and fingerlings. Fly up and dump them in mountain lakes.
Yep... and they use airplanes to stock remote lakes as well....
They dump them out just like they do when they fight forest fires...
They usually like to keep it quiet, as they like to give the little fishs the best chance for survival... the last thing they need is a bunch of fishermen/fisherpersons up there catching them as soon as they hit the water...
Of course, they stock lakes by truck whenever possible... they have a massive dump gate that reduces the chance of injury to the fish...
Saskwatcher
Sep 4 2005, 05:42 AM
Subject has several "flaws"...
#1. It has a neck.
#2. Narrow shoulders.
#3. Short arms.
#4. Skinny legs.
#5. Photo shows no detail: subject is in silhoette(sp).
Submitter is, in my opinion, lying....
obviously trying to perpetrate a HOAX.
Levin
Sep 4 2005, 08:50 AM
QUOTE(Saskwatcher @ Sep 4 2005, 05:42 AM)
Subject has several "flaws"...
#1. It has a neck.
#2. Narrow shoulders.
#3. Short arms.
#4. Skinny legs.
#5. Photo shows no detail: subject is in silhoette(sp).
Submitter is, in my opinion, lying....
obviously trying to perpetrate a HOAX.

this would be a much much better hoax if they had infact made the legs thicker, and the arms a little bit longer...
scotto
Sep 4 2005, 11:15 PM
QUOTE(RB @ Sep 3 2005, 03:10 PM)
Yep... and they use airplanes to stock remote lakes as well....
They dump them out just like they do when they fight forest fires...
I guess RB hasn't heard about the latest gimmick, fire fighting - fish stocking method, all in one shot.
Wylee Coyotee
Sep 30 2005, 07:21 PM
Arms don't look nearly long enough don't you think?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.