ILresearcher
May 16 2005, 09:59 AM
I just find out about this movie from bigfoot movies in www.google.com. Hollywood Video near my house have it then I rented it. The story is so so and the name of movie don't make sense because they don't looking for Sasquatches and they looked for unknown bones that found 100 years ago. They noticed something wrong and feel that someone followed them. They don't say about bigfoot until much later of the movie. Doctors and game wardens don't know what's the monster until they encounter bigfoot and the location is in Washington State. Oh come on!
Sasquatches look little better than Sasquatch 2003 movie. 1967 film still a winner! At the end of the movie, many Sasquatches go after them don't make sense! Rented this is better than to buy around 20 dollars to keep it!
micahn
May 16 2005, 03:27 PM
2 or 3 other post have already talked about this.
shadowatcher
May 28 2005, 10:30 PM
I rented the movie "Sasquatch Hunters" and it was the absolute worst bigfoot movie I've ever watched. Thats not saying much because every single BF movie (non-documentary) that has ever been made has been horrificly bad, with the exception of the original Boggy Creek film (which is still a "B" movie). No BF movie has ever come close to being "ok" let alone "good". I cannot wait for the day that someone actually makes a truly good and accurate Bigfoot movie.
Just a few comments about how bad "Sasquatch Hunters" actually is:
1. They are able to instantly kill an adult sasquatch with ONE 9mm round from a pistol (its actually in the movie, during the attack on the shack they take shelter in). There have been reports of a Sasquatch being shot with TWO 10 gauge slugs at close range and the creature getting up and walking away. That would kill any size bear.
2. This group of scientists and woodsmen are being attacked by these creatures and no one has a clue what they are. Only ONE TIME does someone mention the word "bigfoot" but only in a casual way, intimating that even he doesn't think it is actually a bigfoot. The word "Sasquatch" isn't even said once through the entire movie.
3. The woods are clearly NOT Pacific Northwest woods. They are actually much more like trees found in central/western Texas area.
4. After everything is over and they drive away, they stop (!!!) and act like "what were those things".
This doesn't even qualify for a "B" movie. If there is such a thing as a "C" or "F" movie this would be it.
It just ticked me off. It makes all of the serious efforts of Bigfoot researchers and investigators seem like a joke, making Bigfoot a typical stupid movie monster and we the "hunters" like idiots who actually take the phenomenon seriously.
JohnB
Shadowatcher