Hi All
I haven't been able to get back to post for a while . . . end of the school quarter and all. But I'm prying loose some time tonight. There have been some mighty nice replies, and I'm happy to finally getting some time to respond.
As far as future compositions, I sort of have one in the works that I have re-visited, thanks to
RobUstes suggestion about one peering in a window. I had started one a while back, actually putting YOU the viewer right in the composition. Picture going out the back door, just holding the screen door open on a clear moonlit night, and there, right at the end of the driveway, is a Bigfoot! And it looks equally startled. I never finished the pic, but decided to revisit it and see what could be done to it. Stay tuned!
It's also as close to that kind of "theme" as I want to get. Like RobUstes mentioned in his last post, I've attempted to picture these creatures in their natural habitat, doing normal things. Hollywood and the mass media do ENOUGH monsterizing of this creature, and don't feel compelled to add to that rather suggestive and in my mind, negative composition. There appears to be a lot of evidence indicating an above average intelligence with these guys, but there is still the reality that we are dealing with an unknown "animal" and must be approached with caution. But I won't add to the "monster" myth.
Actually, the idea from RobUstes about the family group is quite attractive. That's probably gonna be next.
Streamrunner wanted to know how I got involved. I grew up in Wisconsiin, and as a kid could only find ONE book in my school library about Sasquatch, Nessie, et al, but I read it repeatedly. I've always found the idea of a living primate in North America pretty attractive. And as an artist, was more than motivated to try my hand at picturing these guys. Back in December 1999, I had just finished designing a whole tarot deck (for self examination, NOT precognition), and needed a play project. I decided to finally take a swing at doing a Bigfoot. "Sasquatch: America's Great Ape" was the result. After that, it just snow balled.
But there IS another reason. I was completely baffled by how the media treated the subject, especially in the face of some pretty convincing evidence. In nearly ANY court in the world, a foot print is considered proof of evidence. Why not here? The ridiculous method that this subject was treated got my "radical" up, and decided to make the Bigfoot my specialty. I REALLY hate being treated like an idiot, and when a thinking person realizes that any wide awake third grader can pick out a fake priint, and the media consistently insisted that this is the case, well . . . consider this my way of firing back at the venal sleazers that manipulate our media.
So. Hope that answers you, Streamrunner! I know, it's quite a rant. Felt good to get that off my chest, actually . . . again!
Thanks everyone! Stay tuned!
Paul
http://home.attbi.com/~paul.smith7/Index.htm