QUOTE(Streamrunner @ Mar 17 2003, 07:31 PM)
Cool stuff. Needless to say if you see imprints around that fit sas tracks.....
Otherwise how do you really know for sure?
unless you get other evidence besides it... like a child with a Polaroid who is trying to stick a picture she took into your hand.
I have to admit I have a problem with the number of tree breaks and bent trees that are being atributed to Squatch. I find these in the woods all the time, all over the place, and I really belive they are natural wind/ice/snow artifacts, for the most part. Even the line of bent trees I found, I have no reason at all to think they are in any way related to squatch. But, if I just took a pic of them and posted it to many of the sites, the pic would without doubt be deamed sasquatch related almost immediatly. Now, this is NOT to say that some of these things may not be the result of sasquatch(like has been said, when other indications are present), but like the infamous blob photos all over the place, a pic of a tree hanging over a road, or snaped off back in the woods, or even of trees leaning in a rough pyramid shape(this is, believe it or not, a natural occourance not as unusual as one may think), just does not constitute proof of anything for me, without cooberating evidence.