Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: constitutional protection for Bigfoot?
Bigfoot Forums > Bigfoot/Sasquatch Discussion > Media
tugboatwa
http://wcco.com/water/watercooler_story_060083332.html
QUOTE
State Constitution May Protect Bigfoot

Mar 1, 2005 7:30 am US/Central

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) What do Bigfoot, Noah’s Ark and Amelia Earhart’s plane have in common? They’re all being used to make a point by Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers, who is taking aim at a measure to protect hunting.

In an attempt to mock the proposed change to Nebraska’s constitution, Chambers has filed 35 amendments to protect the hunting of a myriad of other things, including the missing Earhart plane, the ark, Osama bin Laden and the Holy Grail.

“This state is not going to ban fishing, hunting and trapping,” said Chambers, who believes the proposal is unnecessary.

While there is no immediate threat, there are animal rights groups that would like to see hunting, fishing and trapping outlawed, said Sen. Ed Schrock, who introduced the measure. “I think we should probably get out ahead of this.”

The proposed amendment would add one paragraph to the state constitution that says fishing, trapping, and hunting are a “valued part of the heritage of the people and will be a right forever preserved.”

Eleven other states have similar protections in law or the constitution. Rhode Island and California also have amendments protecting the right to fish.

Chambers successfully shot down a similar proposal last year. If he gets his way, laughing, coughing, itching, scratching, lounging, munching and “being oneself” also will be protected.
oregonfootin
Just another waste of time and tax payer dollars. our political system is hard at work.
Huntster
QUOTE(oregonfootin @ Mar 5 2005, 12:20 AM)
Just another waste of time and tax payer dollars. our political system is hard at work.

Yup.

But this time it's wasting time/money on my side.

Imagine all the years I've been waiting for this. Government (in a place other than Alaska, where hunting is a way of life) actually standing up to the fruitcakes.

It's long overdue.
chronic
The preamble to our Declaration of Independence already protects sasquatch, from my perspective-

QUOTE
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
crewchf
Roger that on the Anti-Hunting Org's out there!!!! My feelings are they are after our second amendment rights though, not really protecting animals at all!!!

Crew Chief
Crow
The Government just opened previously closed forest
to cutting by loggers they also put the Wild Horse protection
act to bed allowing hunting wild horses for dog food.
The Government will do what ever it takes to keep
Bigfoot a secret. Again for the logging dollers.
JayleeD
Tread very very carefully with this one please.
Jack Shiite
QUOTE(Crow @ Mar 7 2005, 10:18 AM)
The Government just opened previously closed forest
to cutting by loggers they also put the Wild Horse protection
act to bed allowing hunting wild horses for dog food.
The Government will do what ever it takes to keep
Bigfoot a secret. Again for the logging dollers.

I don't buy this but it kind of reminds me of that show about area 51 on tv the other night... The ufo researcher sums it up as there being a goodyear blimp in the parking lot and the government telling you that theres no goodyear blimp...$%!$!#%^%^!!!! we all see the blimp out in the parking lot lol. I don't buy for a second that the government is trying to keep bigfoot a secret.
billgreen2005bigfoot
hey everyone WOW.. this is definetly a very inportant very interesting article & thread about protecting sasquatch creatures. only time will tell i guess. thanks bill smile.gif new_specool.gif
Ilikebluepez
Maybe you see something I don't Bill. ? Please elaborate? Are you referring to the Washington law?

Well I was going to provide a link, but apparently it is more esoteric than that...lol...

I got:

One BFRO report

Grist.Org

url=http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;276/5319/1636?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=%28washington+AND+state+AND+undiscovered+AND+species+AND+act%29&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT]
A Pay only site!? [/url]

And what looks like a Canadian Blog

This wouldn't bother me so much if I didn't know that it was a real statute in Skamania County

That was as close as I was able to get to the original verbiage. I guess it's just hardcopy in the county records office and not online. I cannot verify the veracity of this verbiage, but it seems counterproductive to alter it in any way....

Way to bump an ancient thread, btw Bill.... thumbup.gif Good stuff.

T.

I was looking for links so long that apparently I timed out on edit. Who's bright idea was that anyway? Just asking. Kinda not helpful. Ya'll are going to have to cut and paste on that one. Not much there, but it was to ilustrate a point like.....

T.
tugboatwa
QUOTE(Ilikebluepez @ Oct 26 2008, 04:26 AM) *
Way to bump an ancient thread, btw Bill....
At least he didn't refer to it as an exciting new article. rolleyes2.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.