 Jacobs bear comparison photo, Not a manipulated image |
  |
 Nov 12 2009, 09:56 PM
Post
#628
|
|
|
Wyatt Herp  Group: BFF Moderators Posts: 5,450 Joined: 22-December 07 From: Plymouth ~ Massachusetts Member No.: 12,419  |
Hi
Perhaps it was one of this guys family members ~ ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Picture removed ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Can be located here, Mail me with any questions ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/44495085@N06/4101781454/ Peace Tim This post has been edited by RedRatSnake: Nov 13 2009, 07:02 PM
Reason for edit: Remove picture and add link
|
 |
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 10:00 PM
Post
#629
|
|
|
Roid Man  Group: Members Posts: 2,252 Joined: 10-August 08 From: My Mom Member No.: 21,792 |
Kudos Timmy Boy!
That was one of the rare occasions that made me gag on my coffee and say "WTF???????" 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 11:02 PM
Post
#630
|
|
|
Keeper of the wolves Group: BFF Administrators Posts: 5,744 Joined: 6-February 03 Member No.: 145 |
ape with serious mange?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 11:15 PM
Post
#631
|
|
|
Five toes - Saskets  Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 20-March 09 From: My house. Member No.: 30,989 |
QUOTE(RedRatSnake @ Nov 12 2009, 07:56 PM)  Hi Perhaps it was one of this guys family members ~ ? Peace Tim  WTF IS THAT??? Please tell me that's not a person. It looks like a chimp with no hair, but what about that tail? Gawd, if this is a malformed human being I'm going to be sick... |
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 11:28 PM
Post
#632
|
|
|
Sweet but oh so Deadly  Group: Members Posts: 3,590 Joined: 7-March 03 Member No.: 188 |
That's pretty nasty looking.
 Maybe next time you post something like that Tim, you could give a little header and warning so that it doesn't pop up in front of kids. I told them it was a ape with mange, but I doubt the image will leave their heads any time soon. This post has been edited by Redwolf: Nov 12 2009, 11:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2009, 11:30 PM
Post
#633
|
|
|
Five toes - Saskets Group: Members Posts: 861 Joined: 10-February 08 From: NY,NY Member No.: 14,875 |
QUOTE(masterbarber @ Nov 12 2009, 07:32 PM) It's a Bear dude.......... I know it's a bear. Maybe I didn't say it right.  I do that often. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 02:45 PM
Post
#634
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo  Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
 Everybody tried so hard to throw bears faces on it that it ended up with two faces. One has an ear formed by background sticks and neither one have eye shine or look like a bears face up close. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 05:37 PM
Post
#635
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 2-February 09 From: Midwest USA Member No.: 28,737 |
QUOTE(1Sean @ Nov 13 2009, 02:45 PM) Everybody tried so hard to throw bears faces on it that it ended up with two faces. One has an ear formed by background sticks and neither one have eye shine or look like a bears face up close. Not to mention everyone steers away from 20:32:05 because they can't explain it. I have yet to see the imaginary bear face drawn on that one. You are right about the eyeshine. Thats the number one thing I notice. It's very obvious and easy to see in the actual photos of the bear cubs, but the ones that everyone has drawn imaginary faces on, have ZERO eyeshine. Some will say it's there but it's not. Or they say that the "bear" had his eyes closed. I love to here that one. Has anyone ever even seen a trail camera photo in which an animal had it's eyes closed?? There might be some out there, but I have never seen one.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 05:54 PM
Post
#636
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
Then there's that so-called tail it's also claimed to be the left shoulder of a forward facing bear with the rear to the tree. The juvenile camp calls it genitals and has a picture that’s a little clearer than this one. It's still not clear enough to call it anything to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 06:05 PM
Post
#637
|
|
|
Four toes - Rugaru  Group: Members Posts: 428 Joined: 5-October 08 Member No.: 24,701 |
The left rear foot is that of a bear.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 06:13 PM
Post
#638
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTerdQWLGa4
And this woman thinks it's a chimp, for a grand total of three different opinions. This post has been edited by 1Sean: Nov 13 2009, 06:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 06:32 PM
Post
#639
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 2-February 09 From: Midwest USA Member No.: 28,737 |
QUOTE(Carolina_Dog @ Nov 13 2009, 06:05 PM) The left rear foot is that of a bear. In that pic I will admit that the foot at that time does look like a bear's paw. BUT---AGAIN____ What about 20:32:05?? No one can explain how the "bear" looks like a monkey in that one. What exactly is the "bear" doing in that photo? I have seen the explanations for the other pics-----but not that one.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 06:39 PM
Post
#640
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
[attachment=33548:ape.jpg]
It is pretty hard to explain that one, this was the best body/terrain overlay match up I've seen. It's not a Sasquatch to Sasquatch comparison but it was something from the primate family. QUOTE(Sasquatchamo Joe @ Mar 2 2009, 03:25 PM) [attachment=33548:ape.jpg] Let me try that picture again I'm new at this. I guess if you want to see it you have to click the little arrow, strange. 
This post has been edited by 1Sean: Nov 13 2009, 06:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 07:02 PM
Post
#641
|
|
|
Roid Man Group: Members Posts: 2,252 Joined: 10-August 08 From: My Mom Member No.: 21,792 |
Sasquachamo Joe? Man I forgot about that one
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 07:36 PM
Post
#642
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
I wonder what it would be like if the tables were turned and we were accustomed to seeing an abundance of Sasquatch, or bears were thought to be nonexistent by most. Would our interpretations of these photos change?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 07:41 PM
Post
#643
|
|
|
Roid Man Group: Members Posts: 2,252 Joined: 10-August 08 From: My Mom Member No.: 21,792 |
QUOTE(1Sean @ Nov 13 2009, 05:36 PM) I wonder what it would be like if the tables were turned and we were accustomed to seeing an abundance of Sasquatch, or bears were thought to be nonexistent by most. Would our interpretations of these photos change? Interesting question, but....... bears are proven, sassy no. I don't like playing the "what if..." game. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2009, 08:32 PM
Post
#644
|
|
|
Two toes - Windigo Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 10-November 09 Member No.: 40,250 |
Very true, it probably wouldn't have been questioned by anyone though.
|
|
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 01:04 PM |
Search the Bigfoot Forums with Google!
The Bigfoot Forums website is dedicated to the memory of Tim Cullen.
"Just remember that we're all in this together and we're all working towards a common goal even if the horizon gets somewhat lost in the fog at times."
"Just remember that we're all in this together and we're all working towards a common goal even if the horizon gets somewhat lost in the fog at times."
