IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Meldrum's screw board method, and findings, DNA findings by Meldrum
colobus
post Feb 18 2008, 01:53 PM
Post #34


Four toes - Rugaru
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 323
Joined: 4-January 04
From: WA
Member No.: 595



Good scrutiny there Ray.

As many have concluded, Henner is out of his depth with the hair thing. I guess that's what you get when you send a parasitologist to study hair. That fact that he's kept all of his findings so close to the vest, and not published anything on the hair - not a word (let alone a journal article) has always been a red flag.

When he did go on record in Jeff's book his main point was the whole medulla issue. But that band plays on.

Thanks for the links.







Edited for spelling.

This post has been edited by colobus: Feb 18 2008, 01:54 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Mon0705
post Feb 19 2008, 11:26 AM
Post #35


Four toes - Rugaru
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 18-October 07
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 9,223



QUOTE(manofthesea @ Feb 18 2008, 01:04 AM) *
I have one simple question regarding the DNA obtained. It was stated that it was quite similar to humans but different from known animals.

It's also been stated that Kennewick man had a slightly differing DNA from the known Native Americans. Is it possible that the DNA from the screw board could be compared to Kennewick mans?


Good question. I don't know the extent of genetic analysis done on Kennewick Man (someone else would have to fill-in the details). I doubt the DNA could be compared directly as is, since it is likely that Kennewick Man's DNA sequence and the 400bp from the screwboard likely were different fragments of the genome. However, if a pretty good sample of Kennewick Man's DNA is available, it would be possible to try to compare them. But I'm unsure if that's available.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
mike2k1
post Feb 19 2008, 03:06 PM
Post #36


Resident Wizard
Group Icon

Group: BFF Moderators
Posts: 3,170
Joined: 8-July 04
From: Just left of the Ocmulgee river Georgia
Member No.: 1,204



QUOTE(colobus @ Feb 18 2008, 02:53 PM) *
Good scrutiny there Ray.

As many have concluded, Henner is out of his depth with the hair thing. I guess that's what you get when you send a parasitologist to study hair. That fact that he's kept all of his findings so close to the vest, and not published anything on the hair - not a word (let alone a journal article) has always been a red flag.



I completely agree. Until he decides to publish something, his findings are meaningless in the scheme of things.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
BigfootXists
post Feb 20 2008, 12:22 AM
Post #37


Three toes - Zoobie
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 103
Joined: 3-July 06
Member No.: 3,461



This is interesting stuff, thanks. Why would it take a year to figure out if the DNA is from a primate and if so, if that primate is known? I don't get it; we can do a human DNA match in a few days, right?

BFX
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 11:42 PM
Search the Bigfoot Forums with Google!